The Culture Of Fear Analysis

Media that could reflect the real America should be based on diversity of views, pluralism of opinion as the American society. First of all, when someone provides the truth of the actual situation, that person is automatically called a “whistle blower”. There are not many of those people, which are willing to expose all secrets that would benefit the society by finding out the actual story. As Goldberg elaborates in his insider book, danger is a big risk factor to them, losing a job for example, takes a lot of courage or foolishness to do that. Goldberg states that it should be normal common sense for the media give accurate information, which surprisingly does not happened in

Sam Roberts in the article A Decade of Fear argues that McCarthyism turned Americans against each other. Roberts supports his claim by illustrating fear, describing betrayal, and comparing it to other United States internal conflicts. The author’s purpose is to point out a vulnerable period of American history in order to demonstrate that Americans felt prey to McCarthy’s negative propaganda. The author writes in a cynical tone for an educated audience. I strongly agree with Robert’s claim.

The media impacts the public emotionally and reports crimes that they feel are significant and

African Americans all had fear in their eyes everyday from the time they woke up till the time they would fall asleep. Being a person of color they knew anything could happen to them at any time. African Americans feared death, incarceration and lynching all because the color of their skin. For instance, “Explain to your six-year-old daughter why she can’t go to the public amusement park ... when she is told that Funtown is closed for colored children…developing an unconscious bitterness towards white people” (King 224).

After all, news programming is meant to relay facts and inform of recent events. Does that mean undertone opinions should be adapted? When attempting to be the “first to report” a story, the lack of hesitation may allow for a story to be aired without all the facts. In the recent high profile events involving law enforcement, many times it initially appears the officer did something wrong. Viewers are incited, accusations fly, protests begin, and violence erupts creating a whole new situation for law enforcement fueled by media (Carlson, 91).

Society expect to be constantly entertained; they have become so concerned with things such as who the latest star is dating, scandals, or dumb people doing rather idiotic things. Much of society have been consumed in their personal instant gratification and what makes them “happy”. When on an off chance that news does show things that are serious and impactful(not necessarily positive things that is happening in the world) people have become so numb that the best they could do is feel sympathetic and at worst continue on with their day. The other part of the problem is that those behind what is being published and shown on the news media have been absorbed in their avarice nature, whatever allows them to make as much profit they do. “Writing thousands of hours of coverage from what could have been summarized in a couple of minutes every few weeks, a new rhetorical strategy was developed, or-let’s be generous-evolved”(6), Saunders describes the new formula formed by mass news firms that would yield the most profit.

Instead of learning, they are constantly bombarded with mindless entertainment, which numbs their minds to the world around them. In comparison, the article suggests that the constant broadcasting of violent images on social media may be desensitizing society to the real world. “As Nitz-fa Dimanche (I) explains, “It becomes so overwhelming at times and other times I don’t even notice when I’m numbingly watching violence. It’s a scary time to have those images of violence to not be as shocking or terrifying.” Videos of graphic police brutality were especially distressing to many people, particularly Americans, and led many people to log off and avoid social media altogether.”

The newspaper I have decided to analyze is The Toronto Star. The copy I have chosen was published on Wednesday, October 21, 2015. I discovered that The Toronto Star sows fear to its readers’ minds and expresses bias through photographs, and using words that are often exaggerated and headlines that are carefully formulated. One page in the newspaper consisted of three articles which headlines straightforwardly suggest fear. The political bias is also presented by the headlines they used when talking about the Liberal and Conservative Parties and Leaders.

"Luckily I was scared into doing something" as The Great Prey says. I would think you would not want to be scared into doing something but maybe it would help in certain circumstances. Having fear makes the experience personal and makes people realize they need to be aware with some changes they need to make in their lives. In my opinion appeals to fear are the best motivation.

Since 9-11, terrorism has more power than ever. Society is easily manipulated by a simple word that can start a war, divide a nation, and instill fear in an instant. Ann Coulter’s article, “Bush 7 Terrorists 0,” and Paul Krugman’s article, “Fearing Fear Itself,” both use use the loaded word, terrorism, in opposite ways: one to promote war by instilling fear and one to avoid war by downplaying the fear terrorism evokes. Ann Coulter, a conservative columnist, uses fear and dangers of terrorism to gain support for Bush’s involvement in the Iraq War in order to protect America from future attacks. Coulter initially instills fear of terrorism when continually using phrases like, “threat of Islamic terrorism” (Coulter) and “another terrorist attack”

In Judith Shklar’s well known 1989 essay, The Liberalism of Fear, Shklar analyzes her view on political liberalism. In other words, Judith believes that liberalism has only one potential purpose/goal. Judith Shklar mentions how the goal for liberalism is to ultimately fix the political conditions which is significant for personal freedom. Using this idea, Judith Shklar further demonstrates her views on liberalism by comparing liberalism of fear and other types of liberalism in her essay ( such as John Locked John Stuart Mill) . Judith Shklar believes that John Locke’s liberalism of natural rights is simply an attempt to fulfill an determined standard order “The liberalism of natural rights envisages a just society composed of politically sturdy citizens, each able and willing to stand up for himself and others” (26-27).

Fear is a daily occurrence and it is a social issue that impacts us all. While walking around the Towson campus/ area I found three possible spaces or places that may trigger fear for a person at night. The first location I spotted on campus that can trigger fear is the intersection of Glen Towers and Union, which is located near Smith Hall and Glen Forest. It has sharp corners making it easy to bump into others, low lighting, accessible emergency poles, and many surrounding stairs.

Racial terror is the practice of social control through violence, and the threat of death. It is often exercised against black men through unlawful mob violence and lynching .In which it is exercise against black men through unlawful mob violence and lynching. Black men are forced to feel the pull of historical racial terror and the unannounced terror of today’s society. Blacks can feel the racial terror with unwarranted Black Death at the hands of the state, and displays of violence directed against defenseless bodies.

There have always been some things about Halloween that we should worry about. In today’s society, there are a lot of crazy people out there. We can’t always trust everyone, not even our neighbors. Our parents have warned us every year about how we don’t need to eat any of our candy on Halloween night. We never understood why exactly.

In the 1950s, the media began to show programming aimed at changing social practices. In the 1960s, research conducted showed a negative response to the media’s anti-crime efforts, leading to the idea that the media could not