Hatred was buried down deep between the Hatfields and the McCoys. Fanny McCoy guided herself through the twisted branches of family, love, and hatred. “The Coffin Quilt” by Ann Rinaldi told the story of the feud between the Hatfields and the McCoys, at least how Fanny McCoy lived it. But was she a trustworthy source of information for what happened? Her young age alone could cause some discrepancies with the telling of the arduous feud. She had divided loyalties within her family which made cause for trouble. Also, being a McCoy gave readers little knowledge of the Hatfields’ viewpoint. Fanny may have been the sole voice of reason, but because of her young mindset, loyalties, and developed dislike for the Hatfields, she proved to be an unreliable …show more content…
With Fanny’s narration, readers dove into the McCoy life and learned peculiar family facts such as Ma’s vengeful religion. For example, Ma would “put the pebbles of everybody she prayed for” (4) by her tree stump. Through Fanny’s narration, readers learned about the McCoys and were not given an insight of the Hatfields. Hatred between the families did not start from birth, and in this case it stemmed from the actions between them. Naturally, Fanny was taught to dislike the Hatfield folk, so readers merely knew what Fanny thought of them. With third person omniscient, readers would know the thoughts of all characters, places, events, etc. of a novel. Using third person omniscient narration would have provided a better understanding of the story instead of being restrained to a single person’s thoughts. Readers knew that “those were the people, headed up by Devil Anse, who shot and killed Pa’s brother Harmon” (12) and continued “The War Amongst Us” (12). Tolbert explained to Fanny the McCoy side of the story, which was the only side she ever knew and could tell the reader. Because of Fanny’s influence, readers were given a prejudice against the Hatfields, therefore she demonstrated to be
This incident went to trial but he was cleared of charges. Two years later, two McCoys murdered the accused Hatfield they were acquitted for self-defense reasons. (Hatfields & McCoys) Months after this had happened a member from each family met and fell in love. These are
The worst bearing of both Rowlandson and Equiano has to face was being separated from their own love ones. Rowlandson was separated from her family and relations when her village was attacked then eventually lost her only child that was with her. Nevertheless, Equiano also endured tormented pain when he was parted from his sister while she was the only comfort to him at once. He was a young boy in a fearful atmosphere with nothing to convey a positive perspective. “It was vain that [they] besought than not to part us; she was torn from [him], and immediately carried away, while [he] was left in a state of distraction not to be describe”.
Jemima’s mother had been secretly writing essays to encourage people to join the rebellion to a newspaper. The British found out that it was her who was writing these essays, so they lured Jemima’s father out of town on a “business” trip. They then killed him and stapled copies of her mother's’ essays to his dead body. The death of her husband made Jemima’s mother go into shock and stay at her friend's’ house for several weeks , leaving Jemima to fend for herself. Jemima’s brothers were at war so the only person she had was her freed slave, Lucy.
At the age of six, her mother died and she was forced to live with Margaret Horniblow, the mother’s owner. The mistress took a good care of Jacobs and taught her how to read, write and sew. Her father was always telling her to feel free and do not feel someones property. While her grandmother was always teaching Jacobs respect and manners. She was always telling her about principles and ethnics.
When Janie first arrives to the town, she is greeted by envious glares and cruel remarks from the porch sitters. “Seeing [Janie] as she was” made them remember the “envy they had stored up from other times.” Their jealousy ate them them through till they couldn’t take it any longer. They made “burning statements with questions, and killing tools out of laughs. It was mass cruelty.
The external and internal conflict in this passage is put in picture by Scout and Jem. They portray Mrs.Henry Lafayette Dubose as someone that is hard to please. Scout said “Jem and I hated her. If she was on the porch when we passed, we would raked by her wrathful gaze... we could do nothing to please her.
In the story, the protagonist Winifred explains about her past experiences with her elder brother Zachary from her early years of admiration to her later years facing the similar circumstances of her brother with her youngest daughter Stephanie. During her younger years, Winifred admired her eldest brother and appeared as an obedient slave to him. Later on, however, she then faces with the disillusionment as her brother’s habits are warped to extreme measures such as smoking and drinking which later accumulates to the sorrow that she and her family faced from losing their youngest daughter Lizzie to leukemia. The death also strikes a permanent blow on Zachary, who later leaves the family due to his strained relationship with his
As each of the chapters started off with the events that were written in Martha’s diary, and then expanded into detail by the author. Another primary source that Ulrich uses is The Trial of Atticus to show why during times of rape in the Eighteenth century it was difficult for women to press charges. Ulrich used The Tale of Atticus and other maps and charts, because it was difficult to paint the history with just Martha Ballard’s
So she stood up to Cecil Jacobs not caring what others thought of her. For instance, as Aunt
The otherwise vague distinction between Walter Cunningham and Burris Ewell in To Kill a- Mockingbird becomes increasingly more transparent overtime as the reader begins to “read between the lines” and comprehend the actions and descriptions of both characters. Harper Lee’s way of contrasting the difference between both characters (Walter and Burris) is initially vague because the reader would usually tend to “clamp” on the fact that both are poor and relatively uneducated, though to different extents. However, the idea of this essay is to prove the alternative notion by which both characters, although similar at first glance, are entirely different through their own psychological behaviors, history, and what the foundation of their own habitual actions are (e.g. farm life, a contentious father, etc.) Concepts of medical research will be implemented to provide a source of documentation and resourcefulness to further emphasize the contrast
Not only does this illustrates the Ewells financial crisis but as well as allude the behavior of the men within the Ewell household. Lee's introduction of Mayella's younger brother Burris was an introduction that was made to catch the reader's attention with Miss Caroline's outburst from seeing
Though Mrs. Norris blames Fanny for Henry and Maria’s transgression when she states “Had Fanny accepted Mr. Crawford this could not have happened” (MP 518), Austen opposes her in the conclusion: “Would [Henry] have persevered, and uprightly, Fanny must have been his reward, and a reward very voluntarily bestowed” (MP 540). The fault, Austen says, is entirely of Henry’s character—had he not committed “a sin of the first magnitude” (MP 510) and continued to move toward change, Fanny would have been his
As many events occur throughout the novel, the reader is able to understand a first-hand understanding of a historical period of time, while also gaining the emotions and logistics of consequential personal experiences. Therefore, from these experiences the reader may achieve a greater understanding of history itself which would not have been possible without the rhetorical devices found inside literature and the truth of Cora’s struggles which were analogous to other slaves of the time, may never have received the general comprehension that it
I kissed them slightly, and turned away” (Jacobs, 79). This is the moment that Linda Brent left her children, Ellen and Ben with her grandmother at her house to get away from Mr. Flint who was sexually abusing her. This moment can compare to the article that talks about motherhood and help readers understand what Harriet Jacobs message throughout the novel was about being a slave mother. The article Motherhood as Resistance in Harriet Jacobs’s Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl breaks down all the parts of Harriet Jacobs life that has to do with motherhood and also explains to the readers about what one of the outcomes is to being a slave which is “Enslaved women and their children could be separated at any time, and even if they belonged to the same owner, strict labor polices and plantation regulations severely limited the development of their relationships” (Li, 14).
The Cunningham’s and the Ewells in To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee are different in a variety of ways. One way they are different is their accountability. An example of this is when Walter Cunningham wouldn’t take money from the teacher to “go and eat downtown today”(19). As the Ewell 's’ father “spends his relief checks on green whiskey”(31). Secondly, these families have very different takes on education.