Violence in media is toxic to young adolescents and children and should be apprehended and should not recur in the future. Media violence is a very bad thing that we have popularized as a generation and made it look funny or good, and that is not the case. we should stop popularizing media violence and we should find ways to weed it out of our media and everything else.The fact is that media violence is bad and an evil thing that should not be gratified. it makes adolescents think that violence is okay and will make them happier it also makes them think it should be used but in reality it makes them more unhappy and should never be used.
“Television programs display 812 violent acts per hour; children's programming, particularly cartoons,
In the essay, “Violent Media Is Good For Kids,” Gerard Jones provokes the idea that violent media is essential for the minds of all children; believing that kids having exposure to violence produce a positive impact on our youth. A well-established writer of several notable books , Jones is mainly noted for his work “Killing Monsters (Why Children Need Fantasy, Superheroes, and Make-Believe Violence)”, a book that supplements this essay. He wants children to be able to ‘conquer feelings of powerlessness’ by inserting themselves into these fantasies, letting them live through them, not physically live them; “creative violence” if you will. Though Jones presented his argument concisely and acknowledged the counterclaim, his reasoning lacked
In Gerard Jones’ essay “Violent Media is Food for Kids,” he forces the reader to decide whether the argument that there is a direct correlation between violent media and violent children is valid, or if that by denying children the freedom to experience violence through media, society is harming a very important foundation of finding one’s self. I find it similar to the Jude Priest case because two parents banded together to sue a band for allegedly putting subliminal messages in their heavy metal music that caused their sons to commit suicide. While most of the expert witness concluded that there was not enough scientific research to prove that subliminal messages can truly influence someone, nor can Vance or Belknap could really be considered
While Jones uses a lot of anecdotes and gives the audience good points towards his thesis, His appeals are riding on the audience’s emotions and does not give enough reason to the effects of violent media on the psychology of the kids consuming it. He definitely talks to a psychologist about it, but that is one person saying that it is good compared to the many who are saying it is bad. It is just not enough to sway the audience into letting them let their kids consume violent media. Violent Media is still an important topic to this very day, especially with the amount school shooting that have occurred since the Columbine Shooting. This topic will keep coming up when dealing with these types of problems and is something everyone should keep in their minds when talking about
Today’s society is also experiencing savage behavior that is directly connected to violent media. The Sandy Hook gunman, Adam Lanza, had a collection of violent video games, including Call of Duty; a graphic first-person shooter. Violence like this can be seen when Montag burns Captain Beatty, “And then he was a shrieking blaze, a jumping, sprawling gibbering manikin . . . a writhing flame on the lawn as Montag shot one continuous pulse of liquid fire on him” (113). It is exposure to malicious media that has led them to accept violence as a quick way to fix their problems.
In “Violent Media Is Good for Kids”, written by Gerard Jones, the author argues that violent entertainments have positive effects on children’s lives beyond their violence and juvenility. In his article, Jones uses a cause and result relationship between violent media and their importance to inform the positive impact of violent media. In addition to informing, Jones tries to persuade parents, teachers, psychologists, and others who are skeptical of the importance of violent media by giving evidence from his own life story and from his research. Furthermore, by informing and by persuading his readers, Jones encourages his readers to experience the significant part of violent entertainments. Even though Jones purpose is to convince about the
There are other ways that violence can be broadcast. Entertainment such as video games, music, videos, graphic novels and movies, all have an impact on the increasing violence in our generation. Video games can be played by everyone, especially adolescent from the age of 12-17. They can “play video games- on a computer, on consoles such as the Wii, PlayStation and Xbox, or on portable devices such as Gameboys, smartphones and tablets (APA).” Also from video games, music, videos, graphic novel and movies also contain sexual contents, alcoholism or drug addiction, guns, domestic violence, and etc.
“The literal meaning of pornography is the delineation of the life of prostitutes through graphic representations of sexual conduct whose deliberate intentions is to arouse sexual desire and to facilitate its expression” (Yafee, 1982). According to a recent journal, it is stated that the theft of personal property and other crimes in Canada showed a decline of 21% as compared to the last ten years, but the crime rate associated with the sexual assaults remains stable- “the lone crime where there was no decline.” (Kohut, 2015). The influence of pornographic media is not only exploiting the image of women in Canadian society, but also men are affected by this erotic art.
In the article Violent Media Is Good For Kids, the author Gerard Jones claims media violence helps out children overcome problems. Jones uses several examples to back up his theory, such as his childhood and how violent media made positive changes to his life. As Jones stated he was “…afraid and alone”. Once he was introduced to violence through comic books, he immersed himself in them, leading to a fearless and social person. According to Jones “...people pulling themselves out of emotional traps by immersing themselves in violent stories”.
Everybody in this world needs a way to express themselves in their own unique way even young children. Gerard Jones argues this point well in his essay titled Violent Media is Good for Kids. Jones is a well know comic book writer with some of his works turned into cartoons and video games. Jones experienced this need for self-expression first hand when he was a child; socially awkward towards his peers Jones needed a way to help him gain confidence in social interactions. Jones talks briefly about his grade school age son and how he was afraid to climb a tree at school along with his peers.
Analysis of Gerard Jones’ “Violent Media is Good for Kids” In the article called “Violent Media is Good for Kids,” by Gerard Jones, a renowned comic- book author, is arguing that violent media can be helpful for children, rather than be overly harmful. Parents aren’t taking the time to really look at how helpful violent content could possibly be for their child. Yet, violence can help children learn how to reach for their own inner power that they may have never been able to find before. Furthermore, children as they grow up may even go towards violence that presents justice, rather than the negative types of violence.
Mother Jones is a reader-supported nonprofit investigative news organization, reporting on everything from politics and climate change to education and food. Violent Media is a recurring topic nowadays in the United States, as well as around the World, and the influence it may had on cruel events; specifically the culprits of these atrocities. Gerard Jones unsuccessfully delivers the message of “Violent Media is Good for Kids” with the usage of Pathos and Kairos, lack of Ethos, and inadequacy of the opposing views; promoting a biased article The article “Violent Media is Good for Kids” written by Gerard Jones, from my point of view it seems to be a written opinion rather than an informational paper.
Thesis Requirement for English 27 NB Title: Media and Violent Behavior Thesis Statement: Media violence encourages real violence I. Overview of Violence in the Media Definition of Violence When we hear the word violence what comes into our mind? For me I always associate violence from movies with fight scenes that show a lot of blood and gore. Although my definition is closely related to the general definition of violence, it’s a bit too specific.
There are many studies on media violence and its social effects. Most of the studies have indicated that children who are exposed to media violence are more likely to exhibit violent and aggressive behaviors. As the child observes the violence, he/she is motivated by the fact that the show is enjoyable without realizing the violent behaviors. As a result, they copy and identify the behavior, and this has detrimental effects on their social life. According to Boxer et al., the content of the media has a direct impact on its audiences (420).
Besides considering some benefits, some people believe that this telecommunication medium creates many problems to the kids. To attract the audiences, many movies and series have a tendency to contain more uncensored violent scenes. Numerous children spend too much time on watching television each day, and their parents cannot control what kind of TV shows or videos that their sons or daughters are watching. Research reveals that exposure to violent media can result in aggressive attitudes and violent behavior in some children (Dr. Gail Gross). This paper, with the aim of providing parents an overview
Huesmann, Moise-Titus, Podolski, and Eron (2003) include that while the findings say that aggressive children may choose to watch more violent television programming it is more plausible to say that early childhood exposure to violent television stimulates increases in aggression later in