Summary Of Kristen Schilt's Work

Oppositely, others have had positive experiences, which has made their work life easier. Co-workers were open and friendly to their changes and offered helpful feedback to maintain an easy lifestyle while transitioning. There was no judgement which made them feel accepted and at ease. This study connects to Schilts book because it shows how transgender inequality is a huge issue. Admitting that this does not look at trans women vs. trans men, it does represent everyone as a whole.

In their respective pieces about the transgender community, Mari Birghe’s piece falls short due to its lack of detailed examples and its heavy reliance on eliciting sympathy from the reader to persuade as well as its failure to see the other side of the argument while Elinor Burkett’s piece proves far superior due to its multitude of extensive examples in addition to its surplus of concessions. Burkett’s piece is stronger in part due to the surplus of concrete examples provided in contrast to Birghe’s meager examples. In Elinor Burketts’s piece, which states transgender women are not entirely female because of their previous male privilege, she intertwines many specific examples that help to prove her overall message. This is that transgender

Book Paper: 37 Words I had the opportunity to read the book “37 Words: Title IX and Fifty Years of Fighting Sex Discrimination,” by Sherry Boschert. In this book, Boschert presents the story of women working in higher education in the 1960s and fighting for gender equity. These women realized that their frustrating experiences at work were not isolated incidents but rather part of a larger system of discrimination against women. Their activism led to the passing of Title IX in 1972, which prohibited discrimination on the basis of gender in all schools receiving federal funding.

“No More Invisible Man” by Adida Harvey Wingfield, illustrates three different theories that describe the inequality between race and gender within the work force. Wingfield’s theories are the Token theory, gender interaction, and black professionals. Wingfield not only identifies the different theories but she also connects her theories with professional experiences. I will be demonstrating the author’s different theories based on the subject of intersectionality and the way it is presented throughout her research in the work force but also the way Winfgield includes theories theories from Kanter, Hill Collins and Crenshaw within her book.

The topic of this text is gender identity and the context necessary to understand the article is what LGBTQ+ and supporters think and gender. The text was created to voice the author’s opinions to an audience of people that

The sexism and masculine norms put out by society are a struggle for men everyday. Men’s mental health is seriously impacted by sexism and masculine norms set out by society. In the film, “The Mask You Live In”, young boys and men talk about their experiences dealing with these norms and how it has affected them today and continues to impact them. Men have to face masculine norms such as, violence, self-reliance, power over women, winning and risk-taking. These brave men go against the societal idea for men and talk about how it feels to be different in a society that is telling you different is

Today, gender inequality in the workplace still remains a popular discussion within institutional and social realms. In Just One of the Guys? by Kristen Schilt, through a variety of methods she shows how transmen are susceptible to systemic gender inequality even if they go through different experiences. Schilt performs in-depth interviews with transmen in the workplace to show how the types of experiences transgender people go through, good or bad, can be influenced on what race or social class they are in. She uses informational tables showing yearly statistics, real life examples of transmen’s stories, and her own observational data to provide an explanation of how individuals participate in the reproduction of gender inequality within

Superiority is demonstrated by non-LBGTQ people as perceiving themselves as more desirable, having more privileges, and receiving more societal rewards, due to the fact that they are part of the majority group. In contrast, they see people who identify as LGBTQ as less desirable, deserving of less privileges and less societal rewards. This example of perceived “normalcy” as superior clearly demonstrates how the rights and comfortability of the majority is superior to the rights and comfortability of an individual from the LGBTQ community. Oliver is extremely uncomfortable using the girls’ restroom when he is dressed as a boy, yet his concerns are dismissed and the school still forces him to use the girl’s restroom in order to preserve the comfortability of non-LGBTQ members.

With a career path set out by both his parents, Shane Ortega seemed determined to change the minds of those who rendered transgendered people invisible and objectified. Moreover, he establishes the idea that the current issue with trans inclusion in the U.S. military is that there is a blatant discrimination and sexual assault prevalence. With relation to sociology, Shane Ortega’s agency, the freewill to change society, allowed him to push for a change in the way the U.S. military views the transgender community. In contrast, the social structures that are already set in the U.S. military prevent and limit Shane from fulfilling his ultimate goal: to provide equal rights for the transgender community. Additionally, Shane Ortega mentions the implementation of “integrated training” is the solution to the rampant misogyny and hypermasculinity in the U.S. military.

This essay compares the articles “Reinventing the Veil” by Leila Ahmed and “Why aren’t woman advancing at the Workplace” by Jessica Nordell. Both articles display oppression of woman due to stereotypes and the culture effecting environment phenomenon. “Reinventing the veil” is an article that shares an insight into the author’s perspective on hijabs and a brief discussion on hijabs over time and what they represent to Muslim woman. The article “Why woman aren’t advancing at workplace” attempts to look at how transgendered people might serve as a medium, to understand the glass ceiling effect and the obstacles woman face at the workplace. These articles share many similarities and will be discussed in this essay.

The author's use of sharp words like "aggression" or "harassment" enhances the article's emotional appeal. Frass also uses a philosophy to set itself up as an honest source on the subject. She makes note of the fact that she is a transgender woman and a Smith College graduate, giving her first-hand experience with the discriminatory practises of female-only environments towards transgender people. Frass is building trust and positioning herself as a spokesperson for this issue by using her own

“Masculinity as Homophobia” an article by S. Kimmel, that talks about how men these days have the fear of being judged and ranked based on their manhood. There are some arguments that the Professor mentions and uses in his article that supports his argument and some experiences from other people 's perspective in life of men over the years. The author’s main argument is about how men these days are being watched and judged closely based on how they walk, talk, eat, dress, move and look like. The author explains how the world is judging men and how it tries to take that power and that pride of being a man.

Transgender is the term used to describe an individual whose gender identity does not align with their sex assigned at birth. The documentary, “Growing up Trans”, is a sensitive clip to watch about young youths who attempt to navigate family, friends, gender, and the medical decisions they face at puberty. “Growing up Trans” focuses mainly on transitioned young youths. The transgender youth from the documentary links to many theories from chapter eight. Theories such as socialization, gender, sexuality, homophobia, transphobia, and microaggression are associated with “Growing up Trans”.

Carolee Schneemann is a multidisciplinary American artist famously knowing for her controversial performance pieces that transformed the definition of art and evoked subject matter on the body,gender and sexuality. Shigeko Kubota is a Japanese born artist active within the Tokyo avant-garde movements in the 1960’s who moved to America and became involved within the fluxus performance movements she is also knowing for her views on gender and sexuality. I am going to draw upon comparisons in these artists work paying especial attention to Carolee Schneemann’s ‘up to and including her limits’ (1973) and Shigeko Kubota’s ‘vagina painting’ (1965). Carolee Schneemann was involved in the happenings which was an art movement in the late 1950’s through

Skeggs proposes that toilets can be “spaces of contestation between women, androgynous or masculine women and transgendered people, as well as between male-to-female transsexual women and non-trans women; and between working-class and middle-class women” (Skeggs 2001: 297). Notwithstanding this, I have decided to narrow the scope of this project down to focus on female toilets in independent Sheffield nightclubs. An understanding of the moral implications that female-only spaces may have on people who don’t assign to their birth gender is essential; thus, this essay aims to be exemplar of inclusionary spaces for a wider and more fluid gender encapsulation. Therefore, I propose that this essay isn’t an attempt at de-gendering toilets or campaigning for queer or gender activism but a celebration of the impact that liminal spaces can achieve by transgressing and transcending external moral and social boundaries. Furthermore, I suggest that these spaces are also found in queer and non-binary club spaces, and likewise in purpose-built safe-spaces; but the proposal of this project is to focus on female toilets as it is reflective of my own positionality and subjectivity of my lived experiences.