Summary Of Ethos Hasty Generalized By Claire Parker

The nature of the current debate surrounding the implementation of universal healthcare in America is troubling because it is comprised almost entirely of pragmatic arguments void of concern for the principles behind the project. Before one asks how much a thing will cost, how it will be organized, or whether “the uninsured” will benefit, one should ask whether enacting universal healthcare is in keeping with the values and principles of the American experiment. In other words, is universal healthcare good for America? Universal healthcare is not good for America.

The United States is the richest country in the world, and with that, we also have the best healthcare system. All over the country, American doctors are working hard in order to find new cure for diseases, as well as discovering new way to make treatments more effective. Trillions of dollars are spent every year in the United States in healthcare, leading to many new advancements in the medical field. Furthermore, our healthcare system continues to improves more and more everyday.

Healthcare and access to medical aid vary from country to country, and because of this inconsistency, there has been an ongoing debate on which country has it right. While America is Canada’s closest neighbour, our countries have prominent differences when comparing our Healthcare Systems. Although the United States health care has vastly improved since 2010, the system still acts with major flaws leaving over 30 million residents without health coverage today. Throughout this essay, I will be comparing at the drastic differences of Healthcare Systems in Canada and the United States. The most prevalent differences between the two healthcare systems would be that Canada has a universal healthcare plan for citizens and the U.S has private and public plan.

When one thinks of the health care system, words that usually come to mind are safety, protection, quality care and the like. We live in a very progressive, very industrialized country as Americans. We have made many technological advances in our sciences. In other words, we are a developed country that provides many opportunities to those who reside here. The foundation of our country is based off of equality, fairness, and justice.

A country's healthcare system is essential to its population, preventing diseases and improving the overall health of its people. Many countries have different forms of healthcare that are available to their citizens. Depending on the country, the form of healthcare can be unobtainable or ineffective. While some countries are able to provide high-quality, accessible healthcare, not everyone is given the same opportunity. When examining the healthcare systems of the United States and Canada, it is interesting to note how their healthcare systems have qualities that intersect and diverge from one another.

However, when compared with other health care systems in the developed world, the U.S. is one of the few countries that doesn’t provide its citizens with universal coverage while also being the most costly (Dalen et al., 2015; Hirsch & Lyman, 2014). The individual mandate combined with provisions within the ACA guide the U.S. health care system towards universal coverage. Universal health care provides security to all people and it is in the best interest of public health. Despite the popular arguments made against the mandate, it is evident that it is not just economical but also, is in line with American values. The mandate ensures equitable health insurance for all which protects the rights of the American people to have access to quality health

Why doesn’t the USA have a universal healthcare system? Despite being one of the biggest world economies, the USA doesn’t guarantee its citizens a tax-funded, widely accessible healthcare system. The US spends amounts orders of magnitude higher than any other country in the world but still ranks 22 out of 35 industrialized OCED countries in their citizens' life expectancy. The main reason for that is a dysfunctional healthcare system comprising different insurance companies, independent providers, and healthcare system providers. Of course, several policies try to help people that find themselves in unfortunate situations.

Implications of Universal Healthcare in the United States “Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in healthcare is the most shocking and inhuman,” words spoken by Martin Luther King Jr during a 1966 conference for the Medical Committee for Human Rights. Yet almost 60 years later, while the world’s wealthiest nations offer Universal Healthcare, the United States is the only one that does not. The United States is considered to be the leader of the free world. One that has led the world in innovation, discovery, economic growth, and cultural influence. What kind of leadership are we showing and what kind of future can we hope for, if we do not put the health and well-being of our residents at the forefront of policy?

The real debate is how can we accomplish the goal of universal healthcare in the most affordable and sustainable way. The United States is evaluated as a wealthy country, yet there are more penurious countries who provide health maintenance, paid through higher taxes. “In the United Kingdom and other European countries, payroll taxes average 37% - much higher than the 15.3% payroll taxes paid by the average US worker” (Gregory). With this data, the only reform would be to end the private health insurance companies of dominant health services, and incorporate a single payer system. Conversely, it is factual that taxes will rise, but the implementation of universal healthcare will better the health of American citizens.

This shows a difference between the healthcare wait times in America and in a country with a Universal healthcare system. Another fact to note is that this wait is not due to the number of available physicians. The website Health System Tracker shows that the United States has fewer physicians per capita than other comparable countries that have universal healthcare such

It utilizes both logos and pathos in order to convince the audience of their standpoint. They list many statistics including how much health care costs per person. With all these statistics, the audience can conclude that America does not have enough money to give every individual health care. The author also runs through the fact that America's government does not have the managerial capabilities to keep this system functioning. When the audience comprehends this fact, they can logically conclude that a universal health care plan will not be effectively instituted if it is set into law.

The current healthcare system in America is based on a private and market-oriented approach. It is a complex system, and access to health care is determined by one’s ability to pay. This system leaves many Americans uninsured

Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.

America is supposed to have the best resources, the best facilities, and the best doctors in the world. Notice the key words ‘supposed to’ because in times like this America is failing. Not only do doctors refuse to care for people of color, sometime doctors will misuse their power and abuse patients by unfairly

Sicko is an accusation of the United States’ health care structure, emphasizing insurance horror tales and profiling states/countries with complete health attention. Moore has used an emotional appeal in the documentary. (Marmor, 2007) The two issues Moore has discussed are the health system and political conditions. However, “Sicko,” struggles to convey the fact that the American scheme of private medical protection is a cataclysm, and also that a state-run scheme, like one that is present almost everywhere else in the developed world, would be the best.