Having a different sexuality than the one expected of you, doesn’t change who you are as a person. Yes it might change how people see, or treat you, but it should never cause you to hate you uniqueness. You are who you are and nothing should ever come between you happiness even if others can’t accept it for what it is.
In “Drowning in Fire” by Craig Womack, the author talks about homosexuality with the help of his central main characters that happens to be Native American. John Hennesha’s is a gay man in rural Oklahoma. John meets Jimmy during their time in school and later again in life. Together they explore their sexuality and eventually become more than just good friends. Both struggle throughout their lives to hide their sexuality. Josh
…show more content…
The line that best describes the frustration Josh feels is when he says, “This friendship thing between them two of us started angering me because it wasn’t always consistent with the vibes Jimmy was sending (269)”. This line explains the reasoning behind his frustration and what he is feeling, the anger and rage that built up because Josh’s feelings toward Jimmy were so strong but they could not be together. Jimmy is inconsistent in what he expresses toward Josh and that leads to the frustration Josh experiences. Eventually, Josh is able to overcome this and remain great friends with Jimmy, but the struggle between the two stays well embedded in Josh’s …show more content…
In many cultures being gay is seen as unacceptable. Being gay is seen as a dishonoring your family and in many cases your family disowns you. It is very understandable as to why John and Jimmy chose it hide their sexuality for most of their lives. Even in today’s society being homosexual or even bisexual is still looked down upon. Hopefully one day soon it will be accepted in societies around the world and in all cultures. Jimmy states that the gay community are “assimilationists, the same bunch of folks telling your great-grandparents to get a job and cut their hair and don’t talk Indian (155).”
In conclusion the author uses his character’s as a way to open the eyes of his readers. As previously stated, having a different sexuality than the one expected of you, doesn’t change who you are as a person. Yes it might change how people see, or treat you, but it should never cause you to hate you uniqueness. You are who you are and nothing should ever come between you happiness even if others can’t accept it for what it
In the novel Forgotten Fire by Adam Bagdasarian, Vahan Kenderian witnessed his world fall apart around him. First, his wise and disciplinary Father is taken away and never heard from again, then his two oldest brothers are shot in front of his eyes. Finally, he is taken away from his home and taken to a dilapidated inn. After he and his brother run away, he is forced to travel across Turkey with nowhere to go. Without his father’s wise words, he is forced to repeat that it all will build character and make him stronger.
John replys with, “No sorry maybe later I have some cleaning to do at my place.” They part ways, but john changes his mind and realizes he can do the cleaning when he gets back. He turns around to tell josh his good news but sees the men he was helping dragging josh into an alley. John Immediately runs over and when he gets there he stops at the turn to peep around the corner and see what's going on and the men beat up josh and through
In the novel The Watsons Go to Birmingham by Christopher Paul Curtis, Momma, Kenny the protagonist's mother, catches her son, Byron playing with matches. This makes Momma very angry because 1) playing with fire is very dangers, 2) this is not the first time she has caught him doing this and 3) fire had, had a significant impact on her childhood because when she was younger her house caught fire and for two years her and her brothers clothes smelled like smoke. Because Momma has experience with fire she knows that it can be dangerous and does not want her son to be striking matches and setting things on fire for fun considering that this could cause serious issues like their house like momma’s catching on fire burning himself or others and
Fiction: Burning Up, Caroline B. Cooney 1. Make a connection (text-to-self, text-to-world, text-to-text) Explain the content (what is happening in the book) of the text and describe the connection you have made. When appropriate, use additional resources (books, the Internet) to illustrate the connection. Burning Up is a book written by Caroline B. Cooney who writes about 15-year-old Macey Clare.
In most cultures today, it is often deduced that people who identify out of regular norms, such as gay or transgender are very untraditional. However, in the documentary Two Spirits: Sexuality, Gender, and the Murder of Fred Martinez, filmmaker Lydia Nibley, shows us how far from true that is. According to the documentary, the term “two spirits” was only recognized in 1990 at an international gathering, as it was a more acceptable term for other cultures, rather than saying gay or lesbian (Nibley, 2009). The documentary focuses on Native American culture, specifically the Navajo culture, where we learn about their beliefs and how their history ties into an inviting culture towards the LGBTQ community.
To understand the linkage between sexuality and gender, it is important to reimagine the relationship between sexuality and gender and the rapport they hold with self-identification. Not long ago, sexuality was tied to procreation - becoming the core of one’s identity. Gender had always been tied to biological sex. However, a crisis of gender identity emerged and blurred the gender and sexuality binaries that had become commonplace social facts. A fluidity was created that allowed individuals to not feel the pressure of fitting inside distinct identification categories.
In preparation for this paper I chose to read Fire in the ashes: twenty five years among the poorest children in America by Jonathan Kozol. In this book Kozol has followed these children and their family’s lives for the past twenty five years. In his writing Kozol portrays a point of view most from his background and standing would not be capable of having. He portrays what life is like for those who have been let down by the system that was meant to protect them. Kozols writing style can be very blunt at times, not for shock value, but for the sake of portraying these children’s realities, and not sugarcoating the inequalities that they are faced with.
Hatred against the LGBTQ begins with the environment and people we are surrounded by in our daily lives. Individuals often justify their actions by claiming that they feel “invaded” and “menaced” in the presence of a person who identifies as a homosexual. For instance, in the article “L.G.B.T. People Are Most Likely to Be Targets of Hate Crimes,” by Haeyoun Park explains how a psychology professor, Mr. Herek, states how same sex marriage usually trigger those who strongly oppose this shifting culture. “They may feel that the way they see the world is a threatened, which motivates them to strike out in
The book Burning Down the House: The End of Juvenile Prison, by Nell Bernstein is a compelling expose on the inherent evil of juvenile detention facilities. In her eye-opening account of the danger that lies within locking up this nation’s youth, Bernstein utilizes a plethora of rhetorical strategies to urge her audience to recognize and act on her claim. In writing this account on the heinousness of juvenile detention centers and why the system as a whole must be reformed, Bernstein uses personal cause and effect examples, studies and statistics, as well as concrete refutations to advocate the world for change. Bernstein starts her argument by providing readers with personal examples of the effects juvenile detention centers had on a handful of the kids she interviewed. Her first example briefly narrates how Jared, an adolescent many would
While reading The Secret Sharer, I saw many parallels between the struggles the two main characters faced and the idea of “passing” and putting on a masquerade to mask who you really are. In our society, often times there are disadvantages associated with “coming out”. It used to be that if a black woman with lighter skin “came out” as being black, she would not have the same opportunities as a white woman. If someone in the LGBTQ community “comes out”, they are likely to face prejudice. Although the character in The Secret Sharer, Mr. Leggatt, hides and conceals his identity for his own safety, still today people hide who they are in fear of the possible repercussions affecting their well being.
Barn Burning is a modern story that shows a theme, plot, characters and uses narrative techniques. The title of the story, “Barn Burning,” is used to identify the main method carried out by the father in the story, Abner to get revenge on the people he grew angry with for their treatment of black people in the south. The story does not give a number of the barns Abner had burned, but Sarty said they had moved a lot of different times indicating the moves were due to Abner destroying the property of others. Abner seemed to have a sickness or craving for burning property; this seemed his way of regaining his dignity or self-respect after feeling he was wronged by the evil, hate, and racism of southern society. Abner kept burning fuel handy and had containers to refill when it was time to burn another barn and caused destruction, but when it was time to keep his family warm in the cold outdoors, he would only build small fires.
Though he could not be explicit in his representation of homosexuality or queerness, in the
Gender and power are quite distinctive from one another in both these texts. From one point of view it could be argued the men are the autocrats and considered as oppressors of females in the male dominated society. In the male dominated society men are the decision makers and have the instrumental role. Despite benefitting from the patriarchy they are still victims (Synnot n. p.).This is because to secure his place in the family, a man has to dominate over his children and wife, therefore faced with a choice between the two sexual dispositions, and a boy has to choose between his mother and father.
With this specific thought in mind, I delved into the writing of Riki Anne Wilchins in an attempt to rummage through her words to find her values, intentions, and modes of persuasion while also looking to see how she chose to effectively project her writing to potential readers. In Riki Anne Wilchins' writing “What Does It Cost to Tell the Truth” Wilchins addresses a multitude of issues caused not only by transgender stereotypes, but all forms of stereotyping. Another example of authority is how she relays to the reader her unfortunate personal experiences with preconceptions society holds. Her examples of credibility included a multitude of experiences when she came face-to-face with ‘social inspection’– the act of society placing meaning on trivial aspects of our lives based off culture.
All things are capable of change in our world, and the symbolism of fire in Lord of the Flies is no different. In the book a group of boys land on a deserted island in the middle of nowhere. They try to build a society built on the ideas of the adult society they came from. At first the boys seemed to be structured and ordered, but soon their primal instincts of savagery came out changing their system into a horrifying nightmare. Throughout Lord of the Flies, the strength and purpose of the fire created by the boys seems to be a meter of the boys connection to civilization, where towards the beginning it is strong and valiant, and then slowly loses its importance and burns out and finally it encircles the whole island due to its savage purposes