Summary Of 1775 A Good Year For Revolution

678 Words3 Pages

Kevin Phillips political book 1775 A good Year for Revolution presents an argument over why 1775 is as important as 1776 or rather more important than 1776. He names 1775 as the catalyst year that pushed Americans Independence. Kevin Phillips has a background as a former Republican Party strategist and worked under the Nixon presidential campaign. His educational background consists of Colgate University, University of Edinburgh and Harvard law school. Other known works of his are Bad Money (2008), and American Theocracy (2006). Phillip’s political argument of 1775 includes American motivation, ideology and complain. He present series of British actions that lead to Colonists discontent like the Coercive Acts. Before thoughts of revolution came he postulates the Declaration of the Economic …show more content…

“…, a frustrated John Adams mused how much better things would have been with some kind of declaration of independence already in effect. In September he gloomed that the Americans behind schedule, should already “have completely molded a constitution: to have raised a naval power, and opened all our Ports wide” (431). The book wasn’t another narration of events. It gave further understanding with its detail descriptiveness and colorful wording. Phillip’s argument that 1775 is more important than 1776 is shown thru this book. While he gives great evidence and examples to support his argument he can't deny the fact that America’s official year as a republic was in 1776 when they signed the Declaration of Independence. The book can be confusing for some readers considering the fact that most of the book only implies the importance of 1775 but never really fully states it. Phillips ends on the note that 1775 just was the year of revolution. “ No other would have proved so fruitful.”

Open Document