Solutions To The Missouri Compromise

The Missouri Compromise started with the subject of slavery and how westerners could not agree whether to permit it or to exclude it. Those settling to the south wanted slavery for economic reasons such as labor while those settling to the north had no use for slavery at all. Politicians in Congress had attempted to preserve a sectional balance between the North and the South. There had been a balance of 11 slave and 11 free states but once Missouri bided for statehood the North raised alarm because slavery was well established there. The issue here was that if Missouri came in as a slave state, it would tip the political balance in the South’s favor.

The Missouri compromise was a bill introduced to stop the fighting between the states about slavery. Each state before the Missouri compromise was determining wither the states were a free or slave state but when the Missouri compromise was proposed it stated that every state above the 36 degree and 30 degree line were to be free. This officially separated the North from the South. The Missouri compromise along with other problems about slavery is resolved when the civil war comes around. The Missouri compromise and the Mexican American war are similar because America kept wanting to expand and the Mexican American war helped America do that.

The outcome of the Missouri Compromise was that “Missouri would be admitted to the Union as a slave state and Maine would be admitted as a free state, maintaining the balance between slave and free states and slavery would be outlawed in any U.S. territories north of latitude 36’30”. (15) After the Missouri Compromise, the Anti-Slavery Society was formed. The Anti-Slavery Society was formed in 1830 in order to end slavery after the death of a slave by the name of Nat Turner. The Compromise of 1850 was similar to the Compromise of 1820. The Compromise of 1850 occurred after the Mexican War when it came to decide whether these states should be considered free states or slave states.

So, this essay will explain one from the other. The Missouri Compromise has many differences from the Compromise of 1850. One difference would be that in breaking up the different parts of the Louisiana Territory, it created peace between Northerners and Southerners. The Northerners were happy that more territory was safe for freed slaves, although they weren't quite happy that there was still slavery in the USA. However, the southerners stayed happy until the Southerners realized that this gave congress a say in which states could have slavery.

This compromise was proposed by James Wilson and Roger Sherman, delegates of the Constitutional Convention (Key Compromises of the Constitutional Convention). The Connecticut Compromise, also known as the Great or Sherman’s Compromise was an agreement that big and small states reached during the Constitutional Convention (Key Compromises of the Constitutional Convention). There was also the Slave Trade Compromise, which restricted the number of slaves counted toward representation and taxation to three-fifths the total number of slaves and prohibited congress from outlawing slavery (Key Compromises of the Constitutional

During the mid 1800’s ‘the controversy over the extension of slavery into western territories played a significant role in the coming of the Civil War. The issue of slavery had been a source of conflict in the United States since the country was founded, and tensions had been mounting in the decades leading up to the civil war. Issues that helped fuel this conflict was fighting between the states that wanted to decide whether a certain state were to be a slave state or not. This included states that were bought after the battles in Texas against Mexico. Along with this certain compromises were questions such as the Kansas Nebraska Act and the Compromise.

The Missouri Compromise was an attempt by the United States government to diffuse the issue of slavery. The issue of slavery had arisen in the recent years due to the expansion of the country. The question of slavery in every new territory rocked the nation. The Missouri Compromise was one of the government’s last attempts to fix it diplomatically.

What impact did the Missouri Compromise have on future territories and their entrance to the union? To understand the Missouri Compromise fully, understanding the events that took place prior to 1820 is essential. The War of 1812 ended with “the Federalist Party all but destroyed.” After the fall of the federalist party, we entered a time period called the Era of Good Feelings. It received this name “due to the one-party dominance” . The party dominating the political elections and the U.S Congress was the Democratic-Republicans also referred to as the Jeffersonian Republicans.

In 1820, Missouri was admitted to the Union as a slave state, and Maine as a free state. This was called the Missouri Compromise. At the time, there were 22 states and half were free states, the other half, slave states. Many were confused as to how this would even work because the slaves would just be able to run away to free states. This compromise was to maintain a balance between the slave states and the free states in the Senate.

The admission of Missouri to the Union was met with discontent because many believed it would disrupt the tranquility of having an even number of slave states and free states. The solution was raised to admit the newest northern state of Maine into the union as a free state, maintaining the balance. After this decision was made, they banned slavery in the new territories above the latitude of 36°30’. This solution was referred to as the Missouri Compromise. This may have been seen a victory because of its limitation on the spread of slavery, but the compromise also led to slavery also becoming more deep-seated in the southern way of

It controlled servitude in the nation's western domains by precluding the practice in the previous Louisiana Territory north of the parallel 36°30′ north, aside from inside of the limits of the proposed condition of Missouri. The trade off was consented to by both the genius subjection and abolitionist bondage groups in the United States Congress and went as a law in 1820, under the administration of James Monroe. The Missouri Compromise was successfully canceled by the Kansas–Nebraska Act, submitted to Congress by Stephen A. Douglas in January

Many politicians tried to offer a compromise that would please both the North and the South but none of them worked long-term. The biggest attempt was made by Henry Clay who put forth the basis for the Compromise of 1850 which consisted of 5 steps. “Admit California as a free state... Allow the residents of the New Mexico and Utah territories to decide the slavery issue for themselves. End the slave trade in the District of Columbia.

Although in the Missouri Compromise, Missouri became a slave state and Maine became a free state, it was an example of disunity. All new states north of the Mason-Dixon Line would be free and new states southward would be slave states. As a result, there was also an unbalanced sectional population between the North and South. (Doc. E & F).

Due to the threat of unequal representation in the Senate, Missouri’s entrance to the Union as a possible slave state caused a separation between the North and South. Prior to the concern of slavery in Missouri, the Union had maintained an equal balance of free and slave states in the Senate. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was the agreement, which allowed Maine to enter the Union as a free state in addition to Missouri’s entrance as a slave state to recreate the

The issue the compromise was about was whether there should be slavery in the western territories. Maine wanted to be added to the Union, however, slavery was banned there. If Maine were to be added to the Union, it would upset the balance between free and slave states in the nation and the Senate. So, the Missouri Compromise, proposed by Senator Henry Clay, allowed Maine to enter the Union as a free state, and allowed Missouri to be entered into the Union as a slave state.