Similarities Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

The differences between the Articles of Confederation and the United States Constitution are massive with there being little in common between the two besides the fact that there were both forms of government for the former British colonies. However, that is where the similarities end. The differences start with the branches of government. There was no true executive branch and even if there was there no way for the government to enforce the law.

The creation of a strong national government from the Constitution was meant to reverse the problems created by the Articles of Confederation. America now had a central government, not just state governments. The central government could now, “collect taxes, raise an army, regulate interstate commerce, etc.” This gave the federal government a lot of power that was nonexistent before.

The Articles were poorly designed, giving the government more power than it should have. The Articles of Confederation Issues that Congress would not be able to impose taxes and that the power would be given to the states. The government was depending on the states for making all the money and funds, even though we still had a debt to pay off after the war. There were some states that did not always contribute to the government and congress did not have the power to create a sturdy currency that all of America could use. This new Constitution would fix all of these problems that we had with the Articles of Confederation, with the Bill of Rights, New branches of government, and checks and

During the Revolutionary War, Congress developed the first constitution of the United States, known as the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was drafted in 1776 and 1777 and was then approved by the states in 1781. Although the articles of confederation were weak, it managed to survive the war years. In 1787, a convention was held to rewrite the Articles since the resulting government was weak, that’s when the U.S Constitution was written. The powers given to the federal government in the U.S constitution and the Articles of Confederation differ.

(Tusan, 109). The articles quickly failed but it wasn’t replaced by the constitution until 1787, after constant changes to “perfect” it. The Constitution brought the nation together with the Preamble which states “we the people” in order to make our country come together as a whole. Trying to form a stable union was rocky for America, but with the constitution it brought that sense of stability. The constitution mapped out three branches of government.

What exactly is are the purposes for the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution? The Articles of Confederation was written by the Continental Congress during the Revolutionary War, to basically give the colonies some sense of a unified government. On the other hand, the Constitution was created by the founding fathers to establish a federal government for United States of America, and assign to federal government certain powers. Both documents had similar purpose, but one was more stronger and efficient. There were many reasons why the Constitution was stronger than the Articles of Confederation, and it’s simply because the Articles of Confederation had too many weaknesses.

The United States Constitution was written in seventeen eighty seven to address governmental weaknesses that existed in the Articles of the Confederation, the first articles written during the Revolutionary War to establish regulations for a unified government. The Constitution not only established law, it incorporated basic rights for citizens and dictated to what extent the government could rule. Albeit an improvement to the Articles of the Confederation, according to “The Great Debate”, in order for the Constitution to go into effect, “ratification from nine states” was required. Gaining full support of nine states for ratification was not an easy feat; the changes to the Articles created a divide amongst delegates, the two sides were

After the Articles of Confederation failed because they failed to give enough power to the national government and congress, our founding father’s needed to reflect on its flaws for a new system to be set in place. Their new creation, our Constitution, was then set into place, and was created from a basis of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation directly influence the Constitution by its failure by changing some of the responsibilities of the federal and state governments. The Articles of Confederation gave too much power to the states, and the Constitution changed that.

Prior to the U.S. Constitution, the Articles of Confederation was the first written constitution of the United States, one that was created with a sense of urgency in an effort to have a written document outlining the rules of the new nation. The potential efficacy of this document was inhibited by fear of central governments. Most governmental powers were retained by the states. This was intended to prevent potential tyranny and corruption by a centralized and national government. The Articles of Confederation proved to be weak as it prevented the national government from enforcing laws and taxation.

The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution were both recognized and followed by the same group of people. Even though the same group of people followed these two documents, these documents are very different. One example is the writing style of each document. The Articles of Confederation were repetitive, less direct and less certified for quoting than the Constitution. The two documents have a different approach towards the type of government and its control over the matters.

The Articles of Confederation were a document seen as the “first” constitution of the United States. This document granted the new national government power to control the military, declare war, and create treaties between the states. However, the Articles had holes in it considering the government did not have the power to tax, create laws without at least nine states’ approval, or change the Articles of Confederation without a unanimous vote. This means that the country soon fell into debt and petty arguments between state, the new government had no control. It was time for a change.

Articles of Confederation vs. U.S. Constitution The Articles of the Confederation and the U.S. Constitution are two articles that where written and accepted by the United States as a foundation for their new government. They are both very important documents that have similarities and differences. Some of the main things the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution have in common is that they addressed the needs of its constituencies.

They hoped to create a better government. The Constitution replaced the Article of Confederation permanently in March 4, 1789. The Constitution created checks and balances between the three branches. It also, established the Bill of Rights, and the first ten amendments of the constitution. The Constitution had to be ratified by at least nine states out of thirteen.

The new government, the Constitution, is now able to enforces taxes, which allowed money to come in and the government was able to pay off their debt. One other weakness of the articles was that it gave all power to only one house of representative from each state, the constitution try to solve this matter that creating three separate branches of power, the Legislative branch, Executive branch, and the Judiciary branch, allowing the power to be more divided. Representation was another problem in under the Articles of Confederation because a big state like Massachusetts and a small state like New Jersey both have the same amount of representatives, the Constitution made a compromise by forming two house in Congress the Senate, where each state get equal representation, and the House of Representatives, where each state is represented by the population of the state. The Constitution also fixed the problem of passing a law; under the Articles of Confederation, laws can only be passed if 9 out of 13 representatives agrees on the law because of this not much laws were passed, now under the Constitution only 51 percent of the votes to pass the law. From this readers can infer that the Constitution fixed many of the defects in the Articles

In one hand, the Articles of Confederation had a weak central government, differing form the strong central government in the Constitution. The Constitution’s government had a structure of three different branches; the legislative, executive, and judicial branch; unlike the Articles of Confederation that had no structure whatsoever. The Articles of Confederation had many problems like, the poor international trade, poor foreign relations and a weak economy in contrast to the Constitution that only had one problem, the struggle over the ratification. the Articles of Confederation achieved the Northwest Ordinance and the Northwest Territory and according to a history website, the Constitution achieved that we had a system of checks and balances, that we had a bill of rights, and, eventually, the survival of a bloody civil war intact. Lastly, the Constitution had three compromises: the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise and the Slave Trade compromise.