Should teens read a book that contains slurs? In many schools around the world, the book To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee has been used to teach students about our past and other very important details about racism. However, some of the schools disagree and banned the book due to racial slurs, rape, and racism. In this essay, I will be talking about why schools should keep teaching teens the book To Kill A Mockingbird.
To Kill A Mockingbird should be taught to teens because it shows the coming of age of two children and the book is seen through the eyes of a little girl. In chapter 4 we can start seeing the change in scout, “Rather than risk a tangle with calpurnia, I did as Jem told me. For some reason, my first year of school had wrought a great change in our relationship.”(pg.38). This quote shows how scout has matured and dosen’t start fights or problems with others. Scout’s relationship with her brother is also changing. Chapter 12 shows Jem’s coming of age moment at church, “Jem said, ‘Lets go home, Cal, they dont want us here-’ I agreed; they did not want us here” (pg.136). In this quote you can see how both Jem and Scout realize that they aren't always going to be welcomed everywhere. Jem and Scout maturing throughout the book is an example for
…show more content…
In chapter 23 it says, “This was not good enough for Jem. ‘No sir, they oughta do away with juries. He wasn’t guilty in the first place and they said he was.” (pg.251). This quote shows how even thought they all knew Tom was innocent they still pled him guilty just because he was of color.”In our courts, when its a white man’s word against the black man’s the white man always wins” (pg.251-252). In this quote it also shows that even if the black man is innocent he will always be guilty due to the fact that he is of color. The trial with Tom is an accurate example of hoew people of color were treated back
Should Harper Lee's How to kill a mockingbird book be a part of the school's required book curriculum? The issue with the book is the language and the time the book takes place and how black characters are treated in How To kill a Mockingbird. How to kill a mockingbird should not be a part of a school's curriculum in today's world. Why should How to kill a MockingBird not be a part of the school's curriculum? First off because the book is outdated and it does not represent our society today.
He was extremely optimistic that Tom would be set free immediately. However, Reverend Sykes provided a more realistic opinion on the matter, “Now don’t you be so confident, Mr. Jem, I ain’t ever seen any jury decide in favor of a colored man over a white man” (Lee 238)... In this time where racial inequity ran high, a black person winning over a white simply would not happen. Colored people at this time did not have hope of a fair trial in any court, and when Tom was convicted his last shard of hope
To Kill a Mockingbird is a novel by Harper Lee that was published in 1960. The novel has been highly praised for its portrayal of racial injustice and prejudice in the American South, and it has been widely taught in schools across Canada as well. There are several reasons why this novel should be taught in schools to students. "You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view - until you climb into his skin and walk around in it. "
To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee has been the source of much controversy recently as to whether or not it should continue to be taught in schools. Although To Kill a Mockingbird isn’t the best book to teach about racism because the black characters are not fully developed and it can easily be misinterpreted on how to deal with racism, it has strong themes of empathy and teaches many great and important morals through Atticus. Teaching about racism and how to deal with it is an extremely difficult topic, and the novel doesn’t get it quite right. There are many black characters in the novel, but none of them are fully developed characters and are more off to the side. For example, theater critics say that Calpurnia is a much more dynamic character in the Broadway Production of To Kill a Mockingbird compared to the actual book.
In To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper lee Jem and Scout mature through the book. This is caused by all of the perspective changing moments and experiences, one experience that made Jem mature was the Tom Robinson court case. One experience that made Scout mature was when ¨boo¨ saved her and Jem from being killed by Bob ewell. Both of these experiences influenced their understanding between right and wrong.
In some places like Calafornia, Texas and Ohlahoma in 509 public schools, people are thinking of banning the book To Kill a Mockingbird. This book is about a young girl named Scout and the lessons and how she grows along the way. There is also a trial in the book about a black man (Tom Robinson) possibly raping a white woman (Mayella Ewall). The book shows a lot about racism towards colored people. The book could be banned because of the racist language used and rape content.
Should To Kill a Mockingbird still be widely read and taught in schools? Many different views support and invalidate the perspective about whether or not it is suitable for students to read Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird. To Kill a Mockingbird is a rape trial from the eyes of a six-year-old girl named Scout Finch.
Should we be teaching To Kill A Mockingbird in schools? In the book. Both languge and evil are very prominate. Becasue of the lannguge and evil people believe that the book should be banned. In the book To Kill A Mockingbird, both languge and evil are present, causing people to ban the book from our schools.
Should How to kill a Mocking be pulled from the curriculum How to Kill a Mockingbird Is one the few classic novels. This classic novel however is different was pulled from the shelves of “The Biloxi District for its harsh wording, which i believe is wrong. There are many ways why this is wrong and should not have been pulled from the school district because, we could be next.
Why To Kill a Mockingbird should continue to be taught in the classroom. According to research done by Scientific American; children as young as five years old tend to care deeply about what others think about them, and kids as young as seven years old start to connect by asking for help with looking ignorant in front of their peers. Books like To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee are a great way to help show students that it is okay to ask questions and learn things before going out on their own and looking foolish. But those same books are being taken off the shelves at schools and are no longer allowed to be taught because some believe the book is too grim and brutal for students.
Many books have been placed on the banned book list, they have been placed on the list because concerned people fear that certain books have and leave an effect on the reader. America’s classic novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee, has been placed on the banned book list ever since it was first published. To Kill A Mockingbird should absolutely remain on the banned book list because it shows racism throughout the entire book and teaches the reader that being prejudice is alright. As you read the novel To Kill A Mockingbird you notice that it is very racist. Throughout the novel you notice that it repeatedly uses the “n” word.
Some people think that to kill a mocking bird should/should not be taught in classrooms , Many schools teach To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee as part of their curriculum; however, some people think that this book is inappropriate for use in schools to teach this novel , it is important because It helps students understand how life was in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird; the book (should not/should) be taught in schools because bad language, you can learn from it, and it teaches not to hate people for what others did. first off, some people think to kill a mockingbird is not a good story to be taught, because of the bad language for example, in a recently published article( by Brian M). , he says “I turn the channel on TV at home when language gets harsh and my five-year-old daughter is sitting next to me”, However, he changes the channel because he wants his child to grow up with virtues he wants her not to be exposed to that kind of stuff Therefore, he doesn’t want his child to grow up with bad language and bad influences but tkam can be looked as a good influence when you can see the mistakes people made that is why to kill a mockingbird should be taught in classrooms.
Jem is in disbelief of how they could come to the verdict even after Atticus presented substantial evidence. He is very upset when he asks “How could they do it, how could they?” (Lee, 213) This quote shows that Jem feels sorry for Tom and is critical of the jury's discrimination. Jem exhibiting this behavior shows that he is now becoming aware of issues that someone his age might not think twice
This book should be taught to High School students across the country, and it should not be a banned book. To Kill a Mockingbird teaches students morals, and ethics. The book is still partially accurate to what some people go through even in today’s world, and what the books reads is still a part of history that should not be covered up and tucked away. To Kill a Mockingbird should still be taught in school systems, and should not be a banned book because the novel focuses on a part of history that should not be ignored.
Hello, my name is Zac, and today I will be speaking to you all about why To Kill a Mockingbird should not be banned in schools. To Kill a Mockingbird is a novel written and published by Harper Lee in 1960. The novel takes place during the three years of the great depression in the fictional town of Maycomb, Alabama. The novel deals with serious issues of rape and racial inequality. To Kill a Mockingbird should not be banned in schools because students such as myself need to exposed to the themes that are in the novel because the novel’s themes have relevance in today’s society.