Sex Offender Treatment Approaches

Y. (2010). Sex Offender Registries: Fear without Function? SAEN, Inc. Retrieved April 3, 2018, from https://www.saeninc.org/registry_effectiveness Bonnar-Kidd, K. K. (2010). Sexual Offender Laws and Prevention of Sexual Violence or Recidivism. American Journal of Public Health, 100(3), 412–419.

More specifically, it is a repeated cross sectional design examining the treatment given to identify problematic children bent on criminal proceedings. The research conclusion is based on the group’s assessment of the progress of the intervention program Beyond Scared Straight (BSS). Below is the rundown of the treatment, groups, tests, data collection and sample. The cumulative analysis will inevitably reveal what the effects psychological stress to affect criminally learned behavior. The treatment we are evaluating is experimental and determines whether the psychological shock of direct immersion into prison reality will deter troubled misdemeanant youths from continuing down a criminal pathway.

They also challenged the offenders to take a step back into their past and visualize their crimes before and after they were committed, as well as who they all impacted while committing those crimes. Different techniques were used help the students remember their past crimes that most of the students were trying to forget, but this was a part of the treatment program. By forcing the students to recall specific details of their lives, also the pain they suffered .While allowing them to address these experiences which led to them to committing the violent crimes, helped them learn from their mistakes. In most instances the offenders their self were victims of violence before they actually became violent offenders themselves (Hubner,

The Utah Sex Offender Registry has many purposes and has been around for quite some time. Unfortunately, every state is different and often times the entertainment industry portrays the registry in a false light. The Utah Department of Corrections wants to deflate some of the major myths surrounding the sex offender registry. The most common myth the sex offender registry office receives daily is, “An offender was on the registry yesterday, why are they not on there now?”

It is clear that we have not embraced the theory of rehabilitation because we still use prisons to “warehouse” offenders. The concern with “warehousing” is that the offender will more than likely end up back in prison. We have learned that recidivism is a major concern facing society today because offenders have little chance of employment, no funds or housing, and often time’s very little support from family or friends. I stand behind rehabilitation for offenders because I feel like it is the only way to truly stop crime. In

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy is the practice of finding the link between one’s thought’s belief’s and actions, and finding an alternative method to intervene with the connection. This effective process has been in place within the Criminal Justice system for many years now. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy has many different uses and can be placed in to effect in many different ways. Take the for mentioned Criminal Justice System for example. For many years now the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy process has helped many inmates in the past and present to change their thought process and actions while within the criminal justice system.

“Teenager’s Jailing Brings a Call to Fix Sex Offender Registries,” is an article written by Julie Bosman, and published by the New York Times Newspaper. The article is written about a 19-year-old named Zachery Anderson who is listed on a sex offender registry for life. The cause of this was talking to an under aged female through a dating app called “Hot or Not.” Although, Zachary Anderson did not know that the girl who had lied about her being 17, was actually 14, he later plead guilty to what had happened. Reading this newspaper article had me thinking about all sorts of things, whether it was about the fact that Zachary had sex with a female who was under the age of consent in Michigan or the fact that he was put on the sex offender registry.

Latino offenders are more likely to victimize their stepdaughters. About 80% of offenders have a normal intelligence or above. A sex offender can be male or female and hold any kind of job. Along with where they come from, a sex offender can find a victim anywhere around

According to Learningpath.org (n.d.), some of the methods used by Juvenile Probation Officers to help prevent youths from reoffending include

Effectiveness of Sex Offender Registries: Do They Reduce Recidivism? Sex offenders are commonly viewed as the worst of the worst in regards to criminal offenders. Their heinous actions instill a sense of fear among the victim and society at large. Following an offender’s release, regardless of their crime, there is a high likelihood that the offender will recidivate if they are not successfully integrated back into society. Specifically, it is often assumed that sex offenders are highly likely to recidivate and that they will continue to be perpetrators of sexual offenses.

Every state has their own laws and policies for sexual offenses, but a lot of states follow similar guidelines. In addition to laws and policies, there are treatments to be used in conjunction with the laws and policies that are in place to help rehabilitate the offender. The sex offender registry is a form of legislation that exists in every one of the fifty states in the United States. Although the idea of a sex offender registry seems like a smart way to try and protect the public, it can be very controversial and not entirely effective.

The responsivity principle states that clinicians should tailor treatment delivery that will produce the most effective outcomes depending on unique needs of the client. It is important that the therapist considers each offender individually and adequately assesses their cultural, mental, and physical needs. There are several advantages (pros) and a couple disadvantages (cons) to the therapeutic approach of the RNR model. The pros of this model are that treatment intensity is matched with individual risk level, dynamic issues that are directly linked with crime, and that specific treatment is tailored to individual offenders. By matching treatment intensity to risk level, offenders receive treatment that will be most effective in meeting their therapy needs.

The first theory I will be explaining is Rational Choice Theory. Cornish and Clarke argue that “offenders are rational people who seek to maximize their pleasure and minimize their pain.” (Cullen, 2015 pg. 438)

There are three general treatment options for sexual offenders: (1) Cognitive programs focused on changing styles of thought and increasing empathy in the rapist, (2) Behavioral techniques and physical measures focus on the reorientation of an offender´s reactions, and (3) Medical interventions, such as reduction of hormone levels or eventually castration. These techniques have been combined into sex offender treatment programs (SOTP), which are mainly focused on cognitive behavioral techniques because they seem to be the most effective. Still, these treatments have no high overall effect, but every small positive change in sexual offenders is seen as

The theory views the offender as either a patient or a victim or both. According to this theory a person who has committed an offense is not morally responsible for the offense he or she has committed because the offense might be the product of an illness in which treatment is required; this type of person is regarded as a patient. When the offense is the product of a dysfunctional social environment the person is regarded as the victim. The advantage of this approach is that it focuses on the offenders, instead of punishing the offenders this approach focuses on repairing and treating the dysfunctional areas that the offenders are experiencing by means of behavioral therapy and other therapeutic programmes.