Schools Kill Creativity Analysis

He went through challenges and threats while integrating Major League Baseball. In paragraph three, it states,”It hadn’t been that easy to fight the resentment expressed by players on the other teams, by the team owners, or by bigoted fans screaming “n---.” (Robinson) This quote explains that even though he had been forced to live with rejections and discrimination he still decided to integrate Major League Baseball. These events caused him to grow and develop by becoming a determined player and proving himself on the field despite the resentment. In paragraph eleven, it states,”It broke the tension and it made me feel I had to succeed.”

In times of hardship, Jackie had to stop and think about the bigger picture. No matter how well Robinson played, people could not get over the fact that he was

He spoke great words and it even persuaded people to try and make a change in sports just like Robinson was

The Other Education Rhetorical Analysis David Brooks is a well-refined journalist for the New York Times News Paper Company. He writes many different controversial articles, that tends to focus around arguments of education. Within Brooks’ arguments he uses effective techniques to persuade the audience. In this specific column, he addresses society as a whole, but with special emphasis on students. David Brooks successfully persuades his audience through his presentation of his claim, his persuasive writing style, and his usage of emotional appeals.

In the “Against Schools” article, author John Gatto describes the modern day schooling system and its flaws. He uses several rhetorical strategies in trying to prove his point. He successfully uses all three types of rhetoric in writing this article, which includes ethos, pathos, and logos. He establishes these strategies very early, and often throughout the article. He believes one issues with today’s schooling system is boredom, and that there is a distinct difference between what it means to be educated and schooled.

Sir Ken Robinson, winner of the Gordon Parks Award for Achievements in Education and a Knight Bachelor explains how schools are killing our creativity. Robinson proves this by quoting famous artists, reading anecdotes, giving his thoughts/experiences throughout his life, and using the three elements of rhetorical appeals. Sir Ken Robinson explains that from a young age, children are conditioned to only think of one correct answer and to be afraid of failing. Sir Ken Robinson devoted his life to education and became the Director of The Arts in Schools Project. His books mainly consist of educational and inspirational help books.

That schools do not allow students to express creativity Emerson believes that schools do not promote individualism and creativity. That schools do not focus on the needs and interests of individual students Emerson believes that schools treat all students the same rather than treating them as unique individuals. That wit should not be allowed in the classroom Emerson believes that wit is an expression of creativity, and he believes that creativity is a cornerstone of learning.

He took his role as a famous player and used it to bring awareness to the nation concerning what he believed in. Mr. Robinson was a strong advocate

His way of constantly using these rhetorical strategies made him seem credible yet sincere. His personal experience with the argument’s issue evoked emotions that were used in a way of persuading the readers towards his stance. His variations of tones, language, and strategies made his argument clear and effective. Readers were able to be persuaded towards his stance by making us want to act towards diminishing the labels “street smart” and “book smart”. His wording resonated with many readers, stories like these are common to most people.

Theses rhetorical strategies make his argument affective because he makes a connection with the audience, not only blacks but all minorities going through the

TED is one of the non-profit organizations that does help to share different ideas of different people to the world through their persuasive talk. Sir Ken Robinson, in his Ted Talk, discusses how systems of public education disregard the creativity as it is an important factor related with the growth of students, academically. Robinson does focus on the creativity by arguing through different examples, which does make audience, and other viewers to think on this issue and take action which is being ignored by public education system. The use of pathos, ethos, and logos while his talk regarding creativity in school makes the case of education system entertaining and understand, by giving proper examples with the use of humorous tone.

The most compelling evidence involves the scene where the leading teacher humiliates the boy for his creative poem, crushing his individuality. Important to

1.Robinson argues that education systems and society are at fault for the low amount of creativity found in students. 2. Ken Robinson suggests there is a decrease in creativity as a result of an academic inability to nurture individualism as well as a societal pressure to become academically similar. Robinson effectively brings to mind the inadequacy of the education system by addressing its failure in equalizing the importance of all subjects and developing different types of intelligence. His line of reasoning mainly built upon a logical narrative that succeeds in persuading his audience.

In the essay “Doing Nothing Is Something”, author Anna Quindlen uses the rhetorical strategies Ethos, Pathos, and Logos to encourage children today to spend more time doing nothing. Quindlen believes children in America are overscheduled and never have time to explore their creativity that presents itself while the mind is idle. Parents, being the target audience of this essay, should allow their child downtime to explore their mind and creativity. Ethos is used by an author to establish credibility to support an argument.

Within the essays “Superman and Me” by Sherman Alexie and “Learning to Read and Write” by Frederick Douglas, both recount the battle they fought to gain an education from a society that was dedicated to withholding it from them. Each of the authors’ experiences are characterized by intense focus and incalculable perseverance, telling a story of hard won success in the face of adversity. Nevertheless, despite their similarity in message, theme, and situation, the essays are diverge on specific rhetorical techniques, such as syntax and imagery, to tailor their own emotional response in their unique audiences when conveying their message. The essays maintain striking similarity as the authors describe how they learned to read and write.