1. Why do you think Cross does not use the term “sacrament” in his chapter title?
Cross believes the word sacrament is misunderstood. He “doesn’t use the term sacrament in this chapter title because he believes it indicates we must perform or participate in them to receive a blessing from God.” (p. 84). The process of such rituals implies that I can do some action to receive a special gift from God. ‘“Sacrament” is also inappropriate since it carries too much baggage from the history of Christian thought.” (p. 116)
2. According to Cross, what is a sacrament?
According to Cross, a sacrament is “occasions for God’s presence to be in our midst as well as opportunities for believers to express their devotion and faith to God.” They are a actions performed by humans in response to God’s grace. They are “…rich with symbolic meaning and promise of God’s manifest presence. There are rituals of baptism, holy communion, weddings, funerals, dedication of
…show more content…
A dedication ceremony for the child is appropriate.
5. Elaborate on the Roman Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation in the Eucharist.
Transubstantiation is the Roman Catholic doctrine that at the consecration in the Lord's Supper, the elements of the Eucharist, bread and wine, are transformed into the actual body and blood of Jesus and that they are no longer bread and wine but only retain their appearance of bread and wine. Thomas Aquinas presented, “the substance of the bread and wine really change into the substance of the body and blood of Christ, while the accidents of the appearance of bread and wine remain the same.”
6. How would you explain (theologically) what is happening in the Lord’s Supper—especially in terms of Christ’s
A communion is whenever people eat or drink together but when eating is in a book it has more meaning than just food. Meal scenes reveal the status of the relationship between the members of the table. For example, if the meal goes badly and someone gets up and leaves saying that they “lost their appetite”, that signifies a poor relationship. Communions are also not always
With this in mind Bazerman cuts up his definition of genres into categories; the ones that are better known and/or used are “genre sets” and “genre systems.” A genre set is the collection of types of texts someone in a particular role is likely to produce, so try to think of it as a person making the text. A genre system is compromised of the several genre sets of people working together in an organized way, plus the patterned relations in the production, flow, and use of these documents. However, there has been little speculation on the importance of genres in the church when it comes down to the course of assimilation. In this essay, I am going to explain how Titus Harvest Dome (THD) using genres, such as notes, helps make the transition of being a Christian easier.
Hart is a contemporary version of Dr. Horton’s very formal style. However, Hart combines the tradition of Pentecostalism with the reality of Charismatic experiences. Harts uses a dimensional concept to explain his insight. First he refers to the Paschal Dimension, Purifying Dimension, and the Pentecostal Dimension. Instead of trying to completely segregate Lucan passages to empowering references of the Holy Spirit and Pauline passages to soteriological or indwelling references, Hart blends to two together by taking both sides of the initiation – subsequence controversy.
These rituals also create a sense of moral community, in which people conform to, which furthers their purpose and meaning in
In the article it says that Eliezer describes himself as a person who believes profoundly/strongly. The quote that is told means that throughout all the things that have happened to Eliezer he has always believed strongly in things like for instance how he believed in god in the first chapter, he bileived that god would save them all and they would servive the Holocaust. To believe profoundly means to believe strongly and agree. On chapter 1, page 1, it says that “ Why did I pray? Strange question.
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible is based off of the “Salem Witch Trials” that happened in the late 1600s. In the play, a group of teenage girls accuse many people of practicing witchcraft. A young girl, Abigail Williams, accuses Elizabeth Proctor of stabbing her through witchcraft. In an attempt to free his wife, John Proctor confesses his affair with Abigail. When Danforth brings Elizabeth forth to test Proctor’s claim, Elizabeth denies the affair in order to protect John’s reputation.
This means that the bread and wine is the actual body and blood of Christ. Some Catholics suppose that Christ is also present through transubstantiation, which is that the bread and wine represents the body and blood of Christ. Ulrich Zwingli, a reformation and theologian, explained his perspective on whether or not Christ is present during the Eucharist. He argued that the only extent Christ is in the Eucharist is only there symbolically and not present in any other way.
I grew up going to a Catholic school and the idea of going through the motions was very real. We would go to church every Friday as a school, and receive communion, but there was no thought behind it. Sacraments came along the way that were supposed to have spiritual meaning and no one would put any effort into them. This idea came along with Kierkegaard because he saw the loss of meaning during the first half of the nineteenth century. Most people were becoming baptized, joining the church, and dying within the church.
The fourth element that one may be intrigued by is the use of holy water to symbolize baptism. Trinity United Methodist does use holy water for baptism, but does not require self-cleansing of sins before a service. Sacred Heart Catholic Church provides holy water in special holders hung by the entrance of the mass, if a member would like to cleanse themselves of sins. The member simply dips their fingers into the water, and will gesture the sign of the cross when entering the mass. Christians followed this ritual from the Jews of the old testament, although in the past they would wash the entire body in a decorative water fountain.
You shall put it between the tent of meeting and the altar, and you shall put water in it”. Here we see water is for the purpose of purification for those who are going to enter into the Temple. This is an indication of the Church and the ritual of Baptism. One becomes a member of the Church through the sacrament of baptism. Here one can enter into the tent of meeting only after washing themselves with the water that has been placed there in between the tent and the altar.
The ceremony would establish lifelong ties to their godparents. The last part of the ceremony took place at the altar, where the godparents made the profession of faith for the child.
Together with the holy wine, Christ was to offer the Eucharist, symbolic of The Last
First, as the priest walked on to the altar there was a table with a cloth over it which the priest kisses. I was curious as to what the meaning of the table was and asked my friend Paul. His answer was that the meaning the table signified the body of Christ. On that same table the priest set a gold colored what seemed to me to be a wine glass and a circular disk on the table. The priest lifted the circular disk in to the air with both hands and said “this is my body which will be given up for you this is the challis of my blood”.
(and)...once in the world, Jesus called upon things that could be heard, seen, touched, and tasted to bear witness to the unseen God who sent him, so that the commonplace - bread made from barley meal, streams of cool water, and a glimmer of light - became vehicles of revelation.1 Prominent among these are the seven ‘I am sayings’, where Jesus uses such things as bread, light, a door and the shepherd to symbolize him. Koester points out that the fundamental structure of these symbolisms are twofold: the primary level of meaning concerns Christ and the secondary concerns the disciple.2 He says that by concentrating the primary meaning of each image on Jesus and the secondary on his disciples, the Gospel continuously drives the reader to accept the fact about Jesus’ divinity and the meaning of his life (the reader) in relation to him.3 A clear example of this is the last but not least of the ‘I am’ sayings where Jesus represents himself as the ‘True Vine’ which we will here explore more in depth. It seems that this discourse took place after Jesus celebrated the Passover meal with his disciples. He had predicted his betrayal, told them that he had to go to the Father and that he would not leave them alone, that he would send them the Advocate, his Holy Spirit.
These arguments which are contrary to references of Christian baptism in John 3 are presented to help outline their flaws and misconceptions. In other words, they solidify the importance of the