Rhetorical Analysis: The Cry Of The Restrained

Wiesel addresses, “As long as one dissident is in prison, our freedom will not be true. As long as one child is hungry, our lives will be filled with anguish and shame”. Ellie Wiesel is conveying that there is always something that can be fixed or there is always someone who can be helped. Moreover Wiesel explains, “What all these victims need above all is to know that they are not alone; that we are not forgetting them, that when their voices are stifled we shall lend them ours, that while their freedom depends on ours, the quality of our freedom depends on theirs”. Elie Wiesel’s central message is that by speaking out for the powerless, an individual can make a great impact and that there are people in the society that depend on the voice of others.

Furthermore, the author wants us to know that when someone is indifference to the suffering of someone else, he or she is just as guilty as the other person. Wiesel's purpose is to inform us that everyone is different but not everyone is indifferent in order to create awareness of the danger. He establishes a thoughtful tone for readers by using stylistic devices such as repetition , imagery and syntactic

Wiesel taps into the audiences emotions by bring up a personal experience about Auschwitz, he explains to the audience that the “Muselmanner” were treated the worst out of everyone, “wrapped in their torn blankets, they would sit or lie… They were dead and did not know it.” (2-3) This quote helps the audience imagine how the Jews and the prisoners of the concentration camps felt. In delivering his speech, Wiesel repeats the word “indifference” to show the importance of the word throughout the essay.

He drew his audience closer by logically giving them examples and situations wherein anger and hatred is better than being apathetic. He also gave an ambiguous statement “anger can at times be creative” to provoke his audience to think how would anger be creative and better than not doing anything (3)? By solidifying that “one does something special for the sake of humanity because one is angry at the injustice that one witnesses” would his audience realize that what Wiesel was claiming is probably right (3). This would affect his audience in a way that they would start to look in his perspective more attentively with curiosity, guilt, and interest combine. Wiesel purposely divides “You fight it.

Henry Garnet was a Minister and an educator to the black community. He became known for a speech that he done that later became known as “A Call to Rebellion.” In this speech he successfully presents an argument to his audience to allow them to see and understand his viewpoint. With the use of rhetoric in ethos and pathos, a long with his pronoun use, effectively convinces the audience that they could overcome slavery. Henry Garnet effectively appeals to the audience ethically by using his power as a Minister to inform the men of slavery about religious values.

“For the dead and the living, we must bear witness.” - Elie Wiesel. Wiesel was a Jew, Holocaust survivor, professor, and writer. As soon as Elie stepped out of the concentration camps after being liberated, he could not find the words to portray what he had just witnessed. Speechless, Elie took the next few years to recollect his thoughts and opinions, and find the right words to describe the horrors beyond the walls of the many concentration camps he was put through.

Throughout the history of the world, people have displayed hatred towards each other by fighting many wars. Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor, gave a speech at Buchenwald to the President, Chancellor, and people of Germany. Throughout the speech, he establishes that people should learn from past experiences that war, hatred, and racism are meaningless. He accomplishes this belief by using pathos to connect to people’s feelings and emotions. By using pathos, Wiesel develops the central idea of the speech that everyone should change for the better future by accepting wars, hatred, and racism as “not an option.”

To conclude, Elie Wiesel’s purpose is still relevant to present times and has been an enlightenment for many who felt moved by his speech. His skill of using his personal experience to build a new revolution of an empathetic human race helped his audience obtain a new perspective on the indifferences the human race has enacted. Today, society can see more and more of the injustices of the past, and although some people do take action in minimizing indifferent actions, there is still many occasions where society has failed to go accordingly with solutions like the one Elie Wiesel so passionately delivered an entire speech to.

Wiesel’s use of ethos, pathos, logos, diction, and allusion certainly gives the audience information and emotions he was hoping

It was given to recognize the events of the 20th century as the world moved into the 21st century. Wiesel looked back on how people were treated with indifference and asked that the US government and people do better in the new millennium. This was a great speech because of the timing and message. The 20th century was full of wars, poverty, and hatred among peoples. Not only did these terrible things happen, but the victims of them were, in general, treated with indifference by governments and society.

In his 1986 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, Elie Wiesel strives to inform his audience of the unbelievable atrocities of the Holocaust in order to prevent them from ever again responding to inhumanity and injustice with silence and neutrality. The structure or organization of Wiesel’s speech, his skillful use of the rhetorical appeals of pathos and ethos, combined with powerful rhetorical devices leads his audience to understand that they must never choose silence when they witness injustice. To do so supports the oppressors. Wiesel’s speech is tightly organized and moves the ideas forward effectively. Wiesel begins with humility, stating that he does not have the right to speak for the dead, introducing the framework of his words.

In seeing human beings as less than human beings, individuals were able to treat one another with a lack of dignity and voice. Wiesel 's work reminds us that anytime voice is silenced, dehumanization is the result. This becomes its own end that must be stopped at all

He knew that it was important for people to speak out and be heard. Wiesel believed in justice for all. He swore to never remain silent whenever human lives were being humiliated and were suffering. He understood that now and then it was necessary to oppose whenever human lives were threatened, whenever men and women were persecuted for their political view, race, and religion. One of my favorite lines from his discourse is, “As long as one dissident is in prison, our freedom will not be true.

In this passage, Charlotte Perkins Gilman highlights the theme that women must use their intellect or go mad through the use of literary qualities and writing styles. Gilman also uses the use of capital letters to portray the decline in the narrators’ sanity. This shows the decline in the sanity of a person because the words in all-caps is shown as abrupt, loud remarks. Gilman uses this method multiple times in her short story and this method was used twice in this passage. When the narrator wrote, “LOOKING AT THE PAPER!”, the major decline in her mental health was shown.

During the unjust times of the holocaust, thousands of Jews were being tortured and killed as the world stayed silent. In Elie Wiesel’s “Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance” speech, Wiesel shares the horrendous and unjust times of the holocaust and the impact on how nobody decided to speak up. As a quiet survivor of the labor camps Wiesel had first hand experience on the silence all the Jews encountered during the unjust times of the holocaust. Through the use of the rhetorical appeals ethos and pathos, supported by the figurative techniques of anaphora and motif, Wiesel persuades the audience to use their voices against any form of injustice. Through the use of ethos, supported by the figurative technique of anaphora, Wiesel persuades the audience