Rhetorical Analysis Of Susan B Anthony's Speech

Throughout her speech to the National American Woman Suffrage Association on July 22, 1905, Florence Kelley emphasizes the need to modify working conditions for children across the United States. During her speech, the social reformer encourages the women attending the convention in Philadelphia to join her in the fight for labor rights for children. By adopting a stern and persuasive tone, Kelley argues that the exploitation of child labor is a significant issue within the United States. Kelley employs plural pronouns to represent the collective responsibility society has in ending child labor, repetitive phrases to emphasize how widespread the issue is, and rhetorical questions to suggest possible ideas of reform. Most importantly, Kelley utilizes the plural pronoun “we” throughout her speech to establish a sense of unity among the men and women in America and children subject to child labor.

Carrie Chapman Catt was one of the most profound leaders in the fight for women’s suffrage. Catt achieved the 19th Amendment in the early 1900s, this amendment allowed women to be involved in political elections including voting. To ensure the right for women to vote could be in full effect, she addressed the all-male Congress in a speech. In this speech, Catt uses emotional (pathos) and logical (logos) appeals to her audience, along with various examples of syntax (repetition) in the structure of her sentences. She also informs her audience of the sequential events that have led up to the fight for women’s suffrage.

Before August 18th, 1920, only men could vote in the United States. One person that helped to right this wrong was Carrie Chapman Catt. In Carrie Chapman Catt’s address to Congress on women’s suffrage, she uses logos, pathos, and other rhetorical devices to convince Congress to give women more rights. One tool that helps make this speech as effective as it is is logos. She demonstrates logos when introducing the second reason as to why women’s suffrage is inevitable.

Susan helps make a difference and all the other people didn’t do what Susan did. In the article, Anthony saw in the amendment a legal case of the right of women to vote. Later in the article, it said Selden argued that his client was on trial simply for being women. In the quote, “ has the prisoner anything to say why sentence should not be pronounced?” This was the opportunity that Anthony was waiting for.

In 1997, the Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, gave a speech to the graduating class of the women’s Mount Holyoke College in Massachusetts. Her speech emphasizes the importance of women’s rights and the importance of perseverance and the ability to make a difference. She uses a myriad rhetorical techniques to get this message across, such as repetition, allusions to history, and emotional appeals with stories from around the world. Albright’s speech aims to get across the main idea that the women graduating from Mount Holyoke College have the ability to change the world so long as they have perseverance. After describing struggles for justice from women around the world, she states the ways in which the graduating class can also change

Anthony Dares to Vote she demanded to be registered to vote. Also it said “ I shall never pay a dollar of your unjust penalty” This shows that she has perseverance, because people didn’t think that women do as much as men so that’s why they couldn’t vote. Susan B. Anthony didn’t care about that and tried and tried even when no one agreed with her.

Lily Wells Ms. Jones 4th hour 5/01/2023 Barack Obama gave a speech 10 years ago about Rosa parks; a statue being put up in her memory. but it was more than just speech about a person. It was a speech meant to inspire his audience to act with “quiet leadership” and “carry forward the power of… a courage born of conviction” (Lines 50-51). Obama uses stories, repetition, and an appeal to Pathos to carry home his point to act rather than to stay in stasis.

Carrie Chapman Catt, an effective advocate for women 's rights, utilizes Ethos and Logos effective to craft a persuasive argument for the suffrage of women. In Catt’s speech “Address to Congress on Women’s Rights,” she utilizes Logos to gain support for women’s rights. She creates a compelling argument through her concession, repetition, and historical facts to back up what she says. Catt uses concession effectively in her well planned speech. This is evidenced in the line “Gentlemen, we hereby petition you, our only designated representatives, to ...(fight for women’s suffrage)... and to use your influence to secure its ratification in your own state, in order that the women of our nation may be endowed with political freedom before the next

To urge the arrogant politicians to pass the women’s suffrage amendment to the Constitution, Chapman Catt not only induces fear and culpability in them, but the language she employs also establishes herself as a credible individual by aligning with respected figures and emulating the politicians’ style of speech. Chapman Catt establishes herself as a credible individual by aligning with respected figures. Premising from the beginning of her address, she alludes to the cause of the American revolution, and the government’s power coming “from the consent” of the people as the two “fundamental principles” that “anchor” the liberty of the United States (39-40). This aligns her with the American ideals that founded the country. Building on that premise, she continues by

In today’s world, it seems that women have the same rights as men, but it wasn’t always this way. The speech “Women’s Rights to Suffrage”, is one of the most important speeches during the women's rights movement. In the this speech, “Title”, Susan B. Anthony, (American women’s rights activist), is trying to persuade the ignorant people of America about why women should be seen as equals and should have equal rights to men. Susan B. Anthony’s main point of reference in this speech is the constitution to . Susan B. Anthony uses the constitution to build logos.

The speeches of Susan B. Anthony and Franklin D. Roosevelt on women's right to vote were both powerful and influential in their own ways. While both speeches aimed to promote gender equality and secure women's right to vote, they differed in terms of rhetorical strategies and strength of arguments. In this essay, I argue that Susan B. Anthony's speech was stronger than that of Franklin D. Roosevelt, owing to its passionate rhetoric and logical arguments. Anthony's speech delivered in 1873 was a forceful and emotional appeal to the audience to recognize women's rights as equal citizens of the United States. She used powerful imagery to draw parallels between women's suffrage and the fight against slavery, arguing that denying women the right to vote was just as oppressive as slavery.

Hillary Rodham Clinton delivered her speech “Women’s Rights are Human Rights” September 5, 1995 while speaking at the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, China with the intent to educate and spread awareness in regards to the rights and treatment of women around the world, while encouraging women to take initiative and highlight the potential women have if presented with the opportunity of equality. Early in Clinton’s speech, she uses the power of ethos to establish her credibility and continues to build upon it throughout, bringing attention to the fact she has had years of experience fighting for change among people of all kinds. Clinton convinces listeners that she has made women’s rights a priority in her life

However, women suffered a harsh defeat in a California poll. According to the textbook, Susan B. Anthony’s last word in her last public appearance in 1906 was “Failure is impossible” (Roark 536). Moreover, during the Progressive Era in the United States, women started to expand their

Anthony’s speech, she mainly relied on logos to get the American people to understand and see the reason in her argument. “The preamble of the Federal Constitution says…” This piece of text is used throughout the rest of the speech to point out that women are apart of the union and that we helped with many of the government's decisions. She continues to refer back to the constitution when saying, “For any state to make sex a qualification that must ever result in the disfranchisement of one entire half of the people, is to pass a bill of attainder, or, an ex post facto law, and is therefore a violation of the supreme law of the land. By it the blessings of liberty are forever withheld from women and their female posterity.” She is saying that the states are doing the illegal action by not allowing women to vote, not women, or Susan B. Anthony, when she voted.

Topic: Susan B. Anthony General Purpose: To Commemorate Specific Purpose: To Commemorate Susan B. Anthony Thesis Statement: Through her dedication for equal rights for women and the abolition of slavery is more than enough to commemorate this wonderful lady and her accomplishments. I. Introduction: A) Attention Material: Susan B Anthony was born February 15, 1820; a time in which slavery still existed and women did not have the right to vote. B) Credibility Material: These are just two facts that I learned about her while doing my research on the internet and through reading some of her biography. C.) Relevancy Material: Susan B. Anthony co-organized a campaign in 1863, to abolish slavery, and was one of the most influential