Rhetorical Analysis Of Cesar Chavez Speech

Chavez also makes full use of the morals of his readers when convincing them to gift him their support. Published in a religious magazine, Chavez’s article appeals to readers’ sense of religious duty by invoking god. By advocating that God has mandated that life is not something that can be taken away he sways many of the deeply religious to his side. He also appeals to readers’ sense of humanity and virtue, portraying nonviolence as something for those who don’t want to exploit the weak or poor and for those who truely care about people. His audience’s morality will not let them be a part of a “vicious type of oppression” or have victory come at the “expense of injury … and death” or even “lose regard for human beings.”

This book presents the life and times of César Chávez through a collection of nineteen free verse poems. The volume offers real bibliographical information as well as a portrayal of his character and values. Individual poems describe Chávez 's life through his birth, his early years as a farmer, and his last moments as a civil rights leader. Many of the poems incorporate documented quotes from Chávez himself, especially the final verse of the last poem, which serves as an appropriate tribute. The supplemental documents include notes, a glossary to the Spanish and Mexican American vocabulary, a biographical essay, a chronology, a Sources page, and a selection of Chavez 's quotes.

Chavez called upon other people supporting his belief of nonviolence to advance his argument. Therefore, he showed that he was not alone in his belief. He supported nonviolent boycotts and begins to use in the teachings of Gandhi; “the boycott, as Gandhi taught, is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change.” This shows respect for those before him and that nonviolence had worked before. Chavez exercises the idea of power in numbers to develop his argument.

Chavez uses ethos in his article to create a deeper understanding of consequences of using violence to protest, and to make his stand against violence more credible because most people can foster sympathy for suffering and injustice. Chavez’s use of ethos appeals to people’s compassion for others and those in need. The author explains the effect violence has on the human mind as so, “when victory comes through violence, it is victory with strings attached - victory would come at the expense of injury and and perhaps death. Such a thing would have a tremendous impact on us. We would lose regard for human beings - When you lose your sense of life and justice, you lose your strength” ( L.65 prompt).

I Have a Dream’s Rhetoric A momentous day in history is exalted by the enthralling speech and resonating imagery of a man whom wanted to make a difference. Just over 100 years after the Emancipation Proclamation was implemented, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. delivered a very riveting speech to over 250,000 Americans during the March on Washington, the nation’s largest demonstration of peaceful protest. With peace typically comes logic of which King very much emanated from his speech. With powerful rhetoric, King captivated an entire crowd and subsequently the entire nation with emphasizing while being freed from the travesty that was slavery people of color are still placed in chains by society’s gruesome yet commonplace demarcations.

In the speech Chavez says, “We are also convinced that nonviolence is more powerful than violence.” He then goes on to say that violence causes deaths and demoralizes the people, while nonviolence attracts people’s support and is morally just. The use of juxtaposition as a rhetorical device throughout the whole speech shows the pros of nonviolence and the cons of violence. This technique helps Chavez develop his argument because it creates a favorable bias

(Chavez 1) His nonviolent approach to difficulties still have a huge aftermath in our world and change it for the better. The author really emphasizes the trueness of King’s character and his example to our struggling lives to make a better world. Additionally, Chavez uses emotion to change the readers view to the capability nonviolence has. For example, “We are convinced that when people are faced with a direct

In a magazine article by Cesar Chavez on the 10th anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, Chavez discusses the advantages of nonviolent resistance versus violent resistance, arguing that “nonviolence is more powerful than violence.” Chavez successfully develops his argument for nonviolent resistance by utilizing the rhetorical strategies of repetition and allusion. Chavez utilizes the rhetorical strategy of repetition throughout the article, repeating words like “nonviolent” and “we” to develop his and others’ stance on nonviolent resistance. Whenever Chavez states the word “nonviolent”, it is usually followed by its positive effects. For example, in the quote “nonviolence supports you if you have a just moral cause,” the word nonviolence is stated and is followed by its positive effect of supporting those with a righteous reasoning,

Chavez begins his argument by saying that a human life is an irreplaceable “possession given by God”. By resorting to violence, it has the grim possibility of being taken away. Chavez further expands his use of ethos by providing examples of ethics and morals. Nonviolence gathers support for moral causes, whereas unethical actions create discouragement among followers. Violence is merely the result

In “Lessons of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.” there were 3 specific cases that stood out where you can see Chavez’s uses words to influence people. He was speaking to a crowd at a protest for the anti-pesticide movement and the people there mostly supported him, but they still needed to be inspired to take action. Chavez is saying how that they have been fighting this for a while and that “it should be clear to all of [them] that there is an unfinished agenda” and that although they’ve started working, they still “have miles to go before [they] reach the promised land” (13). Here Chavez uses charged language to appeal to his audience’s emotions. He wants them to realize that they still have a lot of

In addition, referencing Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in the text further established Cesar Chavez’s ethos. King was someone who was revered by proponents of civil rights. Associating an audience with a prominent figure such as Dr. King adds to the credibility in the rhetor. Chavez uses the main persona of a human

The audience that Chavez is addressing is very familiar with Dr. King, and the troubles he went through so it is not hard at all to relate to the audience with ideas of Martin Luther King. “ Nonviolence provides the opportunity to stay on the offensive, and that is a crucial importance to win any contest.” With subject of violent an nonviolent means is so important to almost everyone that it makes almost everyone stand on their toes. With the subject Chavez does a good job of stating “we” instead of “I” because of

Working thesis: Engaging in the struggle means fighting for what is right, and fighting for the idea which can benefit all men. This means fighting for the struggle for freedom and equality is an essence which is definitive of what man needs to do in order to make humanity suffer less and to live in harmony with each other. This also means that the struggle should be fought according to the basic premises of what is being fought. In this aspect, fighting for freedom and equality means that nobody should be oppressed, nobody should be violently hurt, and nobody should compromise their freedom for the struggle. This means that the only proper and ethically responsible way to fight for the struggle is to use nonviolent and intelligent demonstrations

This is seen throughout the entire article, but specifically when he says things like “We are also convinced that nonviolence is more powerful than violence” (Line 12). He does this in order to show that together, they can make a change and that no one reader is alienated in their belief that protest of all kinds should be nonviolent. He creates a sense of community and a connection between his readers and himself by using the plural pronoun “we.” Additionally, he contrasts the plural “we” with the statement “those who will see violence as the shortcut to change.” (Line 47).

Bernie Sanders: Behavior/demeanor - The behavior or mood of the speaker Bernie Sanders creates a very unique impression with his appearance and behavior. His age, appearance, accent, accompanied by his stern manner of speech and his occasional fumbling for words. While incredibly arduous to point out specific examples of a strategy that affects the speaker the whole time, his tone is especially evident during his opening and closing statements. Also falling under this category is his common hand movements. Also fickle to explain is it's purpose, it is impossible that these features are here intentionally, but they may not be hidden to create an affect.