Rhetorical Analysis Of Are You Responsible For Your Own Weight By Radley Balko

He shows that most are eating way more calories than they think. His usage of data and numbers in the last part of his essay reinforce what was already a strong

The structure of the article is persuasive. Marks persuades by sharing his personal experiences and giving prominent facts to why Americans need to change. He starts out his lecture by enlightening and informing the importance of eating. After, he goes into how easy and readily available food is and how we do not think of the risks due to these unnatural foods.

In the article “The Fat Tax,” Jonathan Rauch ironically discusses the new public policy concern with obesity. Although the article is a satire, it’s economic analysis is actually valid. In order to get his point across, Rauch uses sarcasm, appeals to logos, and degrades the issue of obesity to help Americans better understand the “big picture.” Moreover, if the diet of American consumers does not change then maybe advertising more exercise to lose weight will cut down the obesity rate; but to be just as effective, enacting the fat tax will improve health as well.

Should Candy & Soda be Banned From School? J. Justin Wilson effectively uses rhetorical techniques in his short article, arguing about whether or not candy and soda should be banned from schools. Mr. Wilson was dominant in appealing to logic reason to support his argument. His ideology is that the government needn’t intervene in the lives of young adults by eliminating fat foods from school, paying particular attention on candy and soda. He states, “when faced with a problem as complicated as our nation 's childhood obesity epidemic, it 's easier to simply assign blame to sugary drinks and snacks, rather than tackling the various roots of the problem” (Wilson, para 5).

Zinczenko’s Rhetorical Precis In his essay “Don’t Blame the Eater,” David Zinczenko sympathizes for port fast-food patron, like himself ages ago,  he agrees that food industry should take some responsibility for obesity. He supports his claim by warning consumers about the dangers of fast food,as it play a factor in obesity. Within his argument, he questions other counter arguments and uses his narrative tone to show consumers that the food industry is necessarily at fault. Zincenko believes  the prevalence of fast food and the lack of healthier food alternatives is causing obesity in America.

There are moments in which some choose to enjoy a succulent candy bar and a refreshing soda, while others choose to eat a fresh cut salad and drink freshly squeezed lemonade. While both of those choices may sound acceptable to each individual, the government does not think so. They believe that there should be less sugary, unhealthy food and more fresh foods available to the consumer. The government should have no control over the food its citizens eat nor should they be able to control the choices that are provided. The government should have no control over the food or food choices that are provided because that limits personal choice.

Eating Healthy Michael Pollan, a health food spokesperson, made some interesting critiques on how he believes that there is an American paradox such as, “a notably unhealthy population preoccupied with… the idea of eating healthy” (Maxfield, 442). The idea taken from Michael Pollan’s quote is that he believes the definition of healthy eating has more to do with how it is “driven by a well-funded corporate machine” (Maxfield, 442). He is also claiming that the food industry is benefiting on our lack of knowledge on how to eat properly when it comes to being healthy. In her article Food as Thought: Resisting the Moralization of Eating, Mary Maxfield directly attacked Pollan’s claims, pointing out the hypocrisy in his words because he is sharing

Ashiqullah Pardisi Instructor Porter ENG 111.124B 8 April 2015 Rhetorical Analysis: Don’t Blame the Eater David Zinczenko’s “Don’t Blame the Eater” and Dr.Mercola’s advertisement “Childhood Obesity is Everyone's Problem” (see fig.1) both argue that obesity is a very big problem which threatens everyone especially children. Fast food and junk food are the main causes of obesity. In David Zinczenko’s essay he talks about how easy it is for teenagers to get obese by eating fast food every day, and he talks about how he became obese when he was young. Dr. Mercola “Childhood Obesity is Everyone's Problem” argues through a picture and title to tell people that obesity is epidemic, and it is not only one person’s problem. FIG 1 Childhood Obesity

In “Don’t Blame the Eater,” David Zinczenko explains that the only affordable meal choice for an American teenager is fast food. Zinczenko recognizes that families consume these food sources because of the numerous McDonald’s restaurants and the lack of grocery stores in the area. Zinczenko argues that “Some fast-food purveyors will provide calorie information on request, but even that can be hard to understand”(464). However, fast-food is not the blame as Zinczenko argues in the article it 's the consumer that is to blame. The consumer has the control to eat what they want.

In his article “How Junk Food Can End Obesity”, Freedman examines these purported claims and strives to appear credible, reliable, and emotionally appealing to persuade readers that the wholesome-food movement is impeding the near-term step’s to reversing the obesity trend. First, many

If these groups can figure out how to solve the overweight crisis we are having, it could ultimately save lives. In his article “Being Fat is Ok” Paul Campos, a law professor at the University of Colorado, talks about how he believes the BMI and the diet industry, are both just scams to make the government and diet industries money. He argues his opinion of the lies that

Junk food is responsible for the growing rate of obesity. This is outlined by David freedman in his article of “How junk food can end obesity.” David Freedman has credited the “health-food” motion, and followers of it along with Michel Pollan. Freedman claims that if the America desires to stop the obesity epidemic, or at least reduce its effects, they must shift to the fast meals and processed meals enterprise for assist, now not the “health-food” movement.

His argue is that, politically, the health care system is becoming more and more socialist. Likewise, our government is too concerned on intervening with our nation’s junk food problem, and should be modeling and encouraging American citizens on personal health, responsibility, and self-awareness. The author feels that “we’re becoming less responsible for our own health, and more responsible for everyone else’s.” (897) Balko seems to hold more credible sources, and being the fact that he is a “self-descried libertarian” (896), he knowledge also helps greatly with his opinion on this topic of

He also states that the government should allow the citizens to access their health care funds account to support his conclusion, that, people will be more responsible for their health if someone else isn 't paying for their health problems. However, Balko fails to to provide evidence for to support his claim. Even though the problem of obesity is important, the Shorthorn should not publish "What You Eat Is Your Business" because it poorly argued and not interesting. Radley Balko’s central claim is that the government should not interfere in public health and diet. According to him people have no incentive to maintain their health when public money funds health care.

The government should get involved in what the teens and kids eat at their schools to provide those healthier alternatives. Obesity in todays youth is possibly at its highest due to bad eating decisions and habits, as well lack of activity that they get. In Source A, one can see how by the government getting involved and putting standards that what kids should eat at school in the long run benefits the kids and helps provide them healthy habits. This shows how it’s a positive thing when the government got involved in deciding what we eat and how much of it we should eat.