Not only was the 2016 Presidential election full of controversy, it was also bursting with multiple forms of rhetoric. Rhetoric was best defined by the 300 B.C. philosopher Aristotle, who stated that rhetoric is “the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion.” (Rapp, 2010) This definition has lasted through the centuries; to this day it is still one of the prominent definitions of rhetoric in America. President Donald J Trump and, runner up, Hilary Clinton both used rhetoric throughout their campaign very effectively. The candidates of this election not only used rhetoric and its canons to successfully persuade the American people, they did it in a way that will shape politics for many elections to come. Leadership …show more content…
She brought to the table a new idea that was supposed to rock the American people and shatter the glass ceiling. That brand new idea was partially her leading as the first women president, but also the encompassing idea that we need to break down social barriers in America. Her rhetoric focused around this idea throughout her entire campaign. A perfect example of this would be in Mrs. Clinton’s concession speech. In her speech Mrs. Clinton remarks, “It was about the country we love and building an America that is hopeful, inclusive, and big-hearted. We have seen that our nation is more deeply divided than we thought.” (Golshan, 2016). Mrs. Clinton uses the canon of rhetoric invetio to proclaim that she was fighting for an inclusive America; an America that would be best lead by a women president. This is a completely new idea in our country and she was at the forefront of it. The rhetoric that Mrs. Clinton used was very effective, and even through all of her scandals, she convinced millions of Americans and even had the popular vote. Her leadership tactics were very different from President Trump, making for an extremely interesting …show more content…
When it comes to rhetoric and people one of the most motivating factors is fear. When you are trying to persuade a country, it is very effective to scare them and then offer yourself as an answer. Trump did exactly this with ISIS. Wendy Wood, in a thesis about persuasion and social influences mentions fear appeals. Mrs. Wood explains to us that, “Fear, like other affective responses, appears to impact extent of processing. At low-to-moderate levels, fear functions, like personal involvement and increases processing. Increased processing may explain the often-obtained finding that fear facilitates influence and acceptance.” (Wood, 2000) If fear influences social acceptance, then President trump used a very effective rhetoric technique to socially influence people to vote for him. Meanwhile, Mrs. Clinton preached rhetoric that was inclusive and much friendlier. While this is the politically correct route, it is debatably much less effective in influencing society to vote for you. This is seemingly a huge reason why President Trump won the
We are getting into the season where political canidates will start campaigning and we will be seeing more of this. I believe that these canidates are using rhetorics to munipulate your thoughts and persuade you through manipulations. We will see more speeches with rhetorics as the months go by. I believe the majority of rhetorics are to persuade you through manipulation. It is more difficult to spot the rhetorics that are out there to enhance the statements.
He then asserts that Trump successfully utilized oratorical tactics to manipulate the unconscious mental frames of voters for political support. He categorizes Trump’s oratorical tactics into repetition and “metaphorical thought”. Trump combined their usage to develop a person which subconsciously connects to voters by altering the way voters perceive his character. Using Trump, Lakoff effectively highlights the power and danger associated with “metaphorical thought” in political rhetoric. Nonetheless, he fails to account for Trump’s use of emotional appeal (pathos) embedded in his rhetoric, as a means of persuasion.
Evidence + Argument Lewinsky uses a diverse mix of ethos, logos and pathos to make her persuasive point that we cannot sit idly by when cyberbullying occurs right in front of us. Ethos, as discussed in the previous section, is a speaker’s credibility. Ethos is not something automatic, it must be established and actively cultivated by the presenter (Keith & Lundberg 39). Logos and pathos are evidence and emotional appeals, respectively, and form the core of the speech’s content (Beebe & Beebe 203). The personal narratives that Lewinsky weaves are able to effectively connect with both of those core concepts, especially as she defines exactly what the consequences were.
Persuasion: The American Revolution and the 2016 Presidential Election Throughout history, persuasion is a tactic used by influential people in order to gain something. In both the American Revolution and the 2016 presidential election, persuasion was used to acquire a number of things: the trust of the people, their vote, their encouragement and overall, their faith. The ideas of democracy, freedom and liberty that political speakers alike employed in both of the aforementioned events helped persuade the American people. The American Revolution contained rhetoric in an abundance of its literature that features the radical ideas of democracy, freedom and liberty.
Rhetorical Strategies Analysis Essay “For the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.” Two hundred and forty one years ago, the American colonies began their fight for freedom -- one year later they declared their independence from Britain as the United States of America. Patrick Henry’s The “Speech in the Virginia Convention” and Thomas Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence were the catalysts for this revolution, and the reason for these documents’ fame could easily be attributed to the power within the words.
In the concession speech following the 2016 American presidential election, runner-up Hillary Clinton employed a variety of rhetorical strategies to connect with and reassure her loyal voters. Through the use of satire and irony, ethos, and anaphora, Clinton was able to effectively communicate her message of perseverance and hope in the face of adversity. At the heart of Clinton's concession speech was a message of resilience and determination. Throughout her speech, Clinton used irony and satire to address the disappointment and frustration felt by her supporters in the wake of the election.
Rhetoric was a necessary tool. Inserted in papers, pamphlets, and articles, these ideas and stories and modes of persuasion pushed the Americans to a Revolution. “All of these notions were neither manipulated propaganda nor borrowed empty abstractions, but ideas with real personal and social significance for those who used them” (Wood 31). The ideas were meaningful, not just rumors and gossip. Not only were they meaningful, but they were relevant.
By saying this, Eleanor presents the rhetorical device pathos, because she uses inspirational words to grab attention and connect with the listeners in a way that relates to them. She also uses vivid language to truly intrigue the audience to compromise and work together to provide peace for the country. Eleanor uses a strong form of ethos in the quote from paragraph 10 , “ This declaration is based upon the spiritual fact
Due to the fact that it is nearing November eighth, this is an opportune time for him to make appeals to United States’ citizens. To support his request, he uses his position as President to sway people to vote. He also uses humor and even pokes fun at Vice President Joe Biden to make the people vote. While those appeals may be enough to convince people to cast their ballot early, he also uses the rhetorical fallacies of bandwagon and stacking the deck to make voters feel like that they should cast their ballot early, since everyone is, and only shows his side of the argument. Thus through ethos, pathos, kairos, and the rhetorical fallacies of bandwagon and stacking the deck, President Barack Obama effectively gets United States’ citizens to vote early.
Like most famous speeches the speakers main goal is to persuade. When trying to persuade or impress someone you are considered a rhetorician. When I think of a great rhetorician that is very notable and had great success in his persuasion. I think of former president Ronald Reagan. Particularly in his speech “Tear Down This Wall” performed June 12, 1987 at the Brandenburg gate in West Berlin.
Introduction The distinct purpose of the use of rhetoric is to persuade the audience. An excellent example of the use of rhetoric occurs in any politically charged situation, be it the presidential debate or the local municipality elections. In either context, the candidate must state their purpose in a manner that will bring the majority of people to their side. It is also a place where the opinions of members of the public can be heard and responded to.
Madeleine Albright Commencement Speech Rhetorical Analysis Essay In Madeleine Albright's Commencement Speech (Given to a Mount Holyoke College graduating class) She uses multiple Rhetorical Devices such as anaphora, epistrophe, as well as her syntax to push her point access to her audience. Her point, being, that this class is one to “break the glass ceiling”. A way that Albright pushes her point across is through anaphora (the repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of consecutive clauses). A good example is the consecutive use of “I met a woman…”.
A Rhetoric Analysis of Metaphors used in the Speeches examines the emergence of morality in the Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s electoral speeches. It attempts to uncover underlying discursive literal and metaphorical structures in her presidential campaign discourse. The researcher’s goal is to verify whether or not Hillary Clinton introduces herself as a progressive leader who embraces all nurturing moral values that are assumed by Lakoff (2004). The abstract nature of values such as care, fairness, health care, education and the like necessitates the use of literality and metaphors which provide an incite for their conceptualization. On the one hand, the investigation is based on a semantic point of view that relies on an application of Lakoff’s (1996)
the fear appeal will be more successful. One example is if people do not stop cutting down trees, oxygen will slowly be depleted until there is not enough to sustain the world. A second example is if the world continues to pollute the environment through developing and using technology as well as wrongful places for garbage disposal, humans, plants, animals, and their environments will be affected by global warming. The next principle is that by increasing the intensity of the fear appeal through evidence and a credible speaker, there is a higher chance of success that the fear appeal will work. A strong fear appeal will cause the audience to be persuaded into making a change.
This mini project paper analyses the approaches used by the President Barack Obama in his inauguration speech which he delivered on 21ST January 2013. The study focus solely on the approaches used by Barack Obama to deliver his ideology as the President of the United States of America to get the public to be acquainted with his administration agenda moving forward to strengthen the democrats in the inauguration speech rhetorically. The discourse analysis was carried out based on the video recording of the inauguration speech delivered by President Barack Obama in 2013 which was then uploaded in YouTube and the findings of this research will be presented in textual analysis along with review of related studies. Keywords: Discourse analysis, Barack Obama, Inauguration speech, Rhetoric, Democrats 1.0 Introduction Discourse