Restraining Observation

MILLERSBURG — Two evaluator say he is not guilty by reason of insanity, now it’s up to a judge to make a final finding in the case against a Millersburg man who allegedly wrote threatening letters to three deputies and a judge while incarcerated in the Holmes County Jail in December. Rhett Neville, 43, of 10489 Township Road 262, previously entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to four counts of intimidation. Since, Neville has undergone psychiatric evaluations and two doctors have expressed opinions he should be found not guilty by reason of insanity. The consistency of the two evaluations, according to court discussions has brought the case to a point where defense attorney Andy Hyde said

On 07/16/2016, at about 1830 hours, in Tower 31 A-pod located at the Lower Buckeye Jail, 3250 W. Lower Buckeye Rd. Phoenix, AZ 85009, Inmate Burgess, Randall T286059 was transported via ambulance to Maricopa Integrated Health Systems (MIHS) per Dr. Gregorio, Gerardo CH117 due to Heart Disease, alcohol withdrawal, and risk for

Youngs had nothing further to add, so I concluded the interview. I took photographs of Mr. Youngs apartment, the abrasion on Mr. Youngs forehead, as well as where the Taser probes penetrated his upper back. The photographs are stored in the “U” drive, in folder “Hurst, L” and under incident number “160183081.” An incident report was completed by Officer Pinkerman Report# 160183081. Officer Martin turned in the spent Taser cartridge (SN#C41041HTD) with two probes, barbs still intact, but wires disconnected, to the property room, property number 16004654.

First he was sentenced to 6 months in jail and 2 years of driving prohibition, second time he was sentenced to 3 months in jail and 1 year of driving prohibition and a probation order of 3 years. In 2001, the accused was sentenced to a $600 fine and a 1 year driving prohibition due to the impaired driving. In 2003, Mr. Allan was imprisoned for 7 days because of the failure to report to probation officer. In 2003, Mr. Allan received a three year sentence for dangerous driving with a five year driving prohibition, two years concurrent for failing to stop for police, and six months concurrent on the theft and possession of stolen property

P alleges excessive force and false arrest. P alleges that he was giving his friend a cane when MOS arrested him. P alleges that he did not have any drugs instead his friend (non-party) had Xanax pills. MOS state that UC observed P in hand to hand drug transaction. P was unable to make bail and remained incarcerated for 6 days.

Prior to the interview, I was informed by Supt. Walsh that detainee Hargrow had just received another disciplinary infraction. I interviewed detainee Hargrow on wing 1A privately. I questioned Hargrow if he was on any medication and he said “Haldol and Klonopin, but did not know his diagnosis’s.

He was issued sanctions to address his non-compliance, but his non-complaint’s behavior continued. On April 7, 2014, a violation of probation was file due to his failure to adhere to the conditions of his probation

The client’s current charges are probation violation and larceny $200 or more not from a person. The client has an additional pending case in Salisbury, Maryland for allegedly stealing laptops. The client has been arrested several times relating to his substance abuse (forgery, grand larceny, and possession). The client is currently awaiting sentencing.

This section will provide a rational for the prioritized issues, as well as, a brief examination of possible treatment outcomes. Marci’s encounters with the law have been an immediate consequence of her alcohol use. Five months prior, Marci was arrested for driving while impaired,

Samantha had hosted a dinner party that night. Once again the roommate had been out late at night drinking. When the roommate came back, she showed signs of intoxication, and Samantha asked us to stay that night with her because there were threats made to her by the roommate due to the party that Samantha had hosted. I wish to note that the party was a dinner, and not a typical college drinking party. Even so, the fact that the roommate came back late at night after another night of binge drinking is another indication that she could benefit from classes, and the threats that were made adds evidence to the notion that a restraining order should be put in place to protect

While I spoke with Sanabria I detected a strong odor of an alcoholic beverage. Sanabria was charged with above listed offenses and he was advised of a Maybrook Court date (10/13/15 at 1:30 P.M. room

Company Grade Article 15, 7 December 2012, for failed to obey a lawful regulation on or about 30 October 2012 and found drunk while on duty on 30 October 2012. The punishment consisted of a reduction to E-2, 14 days extra duty, and oral reprimand. DA Form 4856s (Developmental Counseling Statement), dated 31 October 2012, 7 December 2012, 4 January 2013, and 1 July 2013, reflects the applicant received various negative counseling statements for underage drinking, initiation for elimination, and Initiation of suspension favorable personnel action (FLAG).

If a restraining order (or more accurately, an order of protection) has been filed against you in Arizona, you may have no idea how to respond. You might not understand why it has been issued. You may even feel that the entire situation is completely unfair and uncalled for. You may not be wrong. If you aren’t sure how to respond to a restraining order or order of protection that has been issued against you in Arizona, the first thing you should do is determine what type of order of protection is in place.

on Sunday, Oct. 18, Campus Police reported. When police arrived, they observed the student sitting in a chair and as having "glassy, bloodshot eyes and slurred speech. " Police found out that the student had actually been written up earlier that night by Residential Life after he was found intoxicated in the hallway. When the male was later found around a toilet, Campus Police were called. According to police, the student had six shots of vodka in his room.

Because of this, Officer Mayfield was too confused to say anything, but mentioned something about his headlight being out of alignment. However, Bloom had it checked out a few weeks before. Officer Mayfield let Bloom go. After pulling over Bloom, he pulled over Denise Carrier. He spoke with her about personal matters, such as family and her boyfriend.