Three Major Theories Of International Relations

When the Cold War ended, the logic of the American system was extended to the larger global system. The system aimed to encourage globalisation, integration and democratisation. The founding of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) are evidence of the attempt to normalise these concepts internationally. Moreover, the expansion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the reaffirmation of American alliances in East Asia also served to consolidate the post-war liberal international system. Nuclear weapons ensured stability within this expanding system by making war between the major states unlikely.

Next Soviets launched the first intercontinental ballistic missile, and the United States countered by deploying intermediate range missiles in allying European countries. Each country raising the stakes, nudging the other to retaliation in weapon advancements. 2. Describe how differing ideologies led to increased Cold War

The Cold War a time of political tension between the United States and Russia. The Western and Eastern fronts have different ideologies and since, “The West tended to overate Soviet power and hostility, which created hysteria, NATO was set up as a defense gesture by the Western Powers based on the fear of Russian aggression. In the States, President Truman initiated a document to stop the spread of Communism” (Knudtzon, “Eastern Europe: 1945-1989). The Western front was afraid of the Soviet Union because they were Communists. The democratic countries did not want Communism to spread to their countries and threaten their democracy.

The cold war was mainly a war of thoughts of either being democratic or communistic. We won this because of how we out spent them by spreading democratic ideals which caused them to run out of money. This then lead to the collapsing of the Soviet Union which signaled the end of the cold

NATO was developed by the United States, Canada, and several other Western European Nations who signed the treaty on April 4th, 1949 in Washington, D.C. The U.S. mission to the North Atlantic

A Multilateral Single Party System “What do you imagine, that we will make some kind of NATO here?” (Soviet Supreme Commander Ivan Konev to Polish politicians in 1957). Abstract: In modern history, especially contemporary western history, the Warsaw Pact is considered nothing more than a tool utilized by the Soviet Union to bolster itself in the face NATO.

Nations like the middle east, Afghanistan, and Africa were greatly affected. These conflicting ideologies are main factors that led to the cold war, which destroyed many economies and nations, cost many lives, and the suffering of middle eastern countries. Both the United States and Soviet Union thought their ideologies and political views were the best solution for Europe and the rest of the world. The

Did Stalin pursue post-war protection or control of Europe? Was the Cold War a clash of ideologies or a competition for power and benefits? The answers about those questions vary from one opinion and another, however by determining those ideas we can build a clear assumption about how possible was the inevitability of the cold war. In my opinion the cold war was a combination of numerous circumstances, mainly the ideologies and ideas conflict between the declining communism and the raising capitalism in the new world after WW2. This core concern led to other apparent reasons such as the national security against the Soviet expansion.

The Warsaw pact was made to protect every member in the pact. It was called on the members that if any member was attacked by an outside force the other members would come to the defence and set up a unified military command. Chief in Command would be Marshal Ivan S. Konev of the Soviet Union. On May, 1955 the United States and the other members if the North Atlantic Treaty Organization made the decision to make West Germany a member of NATO and let them remilitarize. The Soviet Union saw this action as a direct threat and created the Warsaw Pact.

NATO and Warsaw Pact. Regionalization can also be fueled by cultural factors

In that period after World War II the purpose for the Alliance was keeping Sovi-ets down Germany out and US in. ‘Deterring Soviet expansionism, forbidding the revival of nationalist militarism in Europe through a strong North American presence on the continent, and encouraging European political integration’ (A short history of NATO). Moreover, ‘several Western European democracies came together to imple-ment various projects for greater military cooperation and collective defence, includ-ing the creation of the Western Union in 1948, later to become the Western Europe-an Union in 1954. In the end, it was determined that only a truly transatlantic se-curity agreement could deter Soviet aggression while simultaneously preventing the revival of European militarism and laying the groundwork for political integration’ (A short history of NATO).

The current work is meant to explain the differences and similarities between the most dominant theories in international relations, Realism and Liberalism, both theories have some similarities and differences but much more important and interesting is to discuss and explain what differs and makes similar both theories. Conflicts and wars, Similarities and differences between Realism and Liberalism: Both Liberalism and Realism believes that there is no world government that can prevent countries to go to war on one another. For both theories military power is important and both Realism and Liberalism can understand that countries can use military power to get what they need or want. Also, both theories are conscious that without military

Western Europe had been devastated by World War II: shortages of fuel, food and industrial capital goods, a drastic drop in foreign trade and the threat of inflation meant the region was in a fragile economic and political position. In this context, increased political and economic cooperation were deemed necessary in order to reconstruct a Europe ravaged by war – which led to the creation of several international organisations (many of which are still operative today). “The US began to change its policy towards the USSR in 1946–47 as its perception of the USSR’s intentions and reliability as a post-war partner who would adhere to agreements was re-evaluated” (Dedman, 2010). The Marshall Plan (1947) was set in motion by the US in order to prevent

In an asymmetrical alliance, an alliance in which there is a large difference in the relative power of its members, the desire for control tends to drive the actions of the greater power. The subordinate member, meanwhile, seeks to maintain the benefits it receives from the larger partner while gaining some say in the actions of the alliance as well. Although surrendering some freedom of action is generally a requisite condition for the subordinate partner, the less powerful nation will attempt to use any leverage it can find to maintain as much freedom of action as possible. These goals are apparent in the NATO alliance, both during and after the Cold War, in the actions of both the greater power (the United States) and the lesser powers (the

The Soviet Union created the Eastern Bloc of countries that it occupied, and used them as satellite countries to spread their ideals in the Warsaw Compact. The United States and various western European countries began a policy of "containment" of communism and forged alliances to end communism, including NATO.In other regions of the world, such as Latin America and Southeast Asia, the Soviet Union created communist revolutionary movements, which the United States and many of its allies opposed. Many countries were prompted to align themselves with the nations that would later form either NATO or the Warsaw Pact, though other movements would emerge. The Cold War saw periods of both heightened tension and relative calm. International crises arose, such as the Berlin Blockade, two wars, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and NATO exercises in November 1983.