American was a term first created for white European settlers to claim a new national identity and a homogenized white racial identity. Using racial theory, we can understand the historical function of the construction of the American nationality as the construction of the white state. Whiteness was constitutive to the American identity in its foundation; Black and Indigenous people were pointedly excluded as a means to undermine their personhood and naturalize their oppression and exploitation. While Americanness was legally redefined to include non-whites in the twentieth century, the sociocultural consequences of its violently racist history persist. To be American means to be inculcated into a culture of hegemonic white supremacy and settler …show more content…
Race, as defined by racial theory/critical race theory, is a socially constructed category situated in specific temporal, geographic, political, and historical conditions. This definition unsettles the hegemonic discourse of race as a western scientific truth, reframing it as a shifting social marker that can be “formed, transformed, destroyed and reformed” (Module 2 Race as a Social Concept). Social construction theory as explained by Jackson and Penrose goes further, connecting race to nation and borders: “‘race' and nation are social constructions, the product of specific historical and geographical forces, rather than biologically given ideas whose meaning is dictated by nature” (Module 4 Social Construction Theory (SCT)). The American government historically conflated the two social constructs of race and nation in its creation of a white-only settler colony, drawing the boundaries of race and nation concurrently. Race gains cultural power over time through its incorporation into institutions through a process called racial formation defined as “the process by which social, economic and political forces determine the content and importance of racial categories, and by which they are in turn shaped by racial meanings” (Module 2 Race as a Social Concept). American policy has played an instrumental role in racial formation through the …show more content…
The census requires its participants to select their race(s) and its data is used to reapportion political representation through state population. The census is, in the words of scholar Dr. Michael Omi, “a form of national accounting that provides a collective portrait of who we are” (Module 2 Film & Lecture: Racial Classification & the 2020 U.S. Census with Dr. Michael Omi). Dr. Omi links the census to the conceptual frame of racial formation that offers a constructionist model and challenges conceptions of race as fixed or static. The census provides its participants with governmentally sanctioned definitions of racial groups from which we are meant to identify with and self select. However, as Dr. Omi points out, it wasn’t until the year 2000 that participants could select more than one racial category, as previously multiracial participants were encouraged to select the race of a non-white parent. Erasing whiteness in multiracial contexts is an example of hypo-descent and an exercise of white nationalism in that non-white racial identities are framed as a contaminant to whiteness and thus illegitimate. This picture of multiracialism is also built on the assumption that all persons of “mixed race” are “mixed” with whiteness, as there was no clear instruction for multiracial participants with two or more non-white identities, for instance Black and Asian,
Everyday the future in America looks brighter for the issues dealing with race and identity. Brave souls are not letting racism, class discrimination, or sexism hold them back anymore. Furthermore, the fight for a balanced society that pushes for equality is on the horizon. As we close on an era, based on purely the skin of the person, we need to analyze the impacts of the Ethnicity paradigm and Class paradigm on politics of the 20th century. Race and Ethnicity are used interchangeable in everyday conversation, however; they are not the same.
A helpful resource for anybody looking to educate themselves and others about the important topics of race and racial identity, the book's simple and short writing style makes it accessible and interesting for a wide range of
Reflecting On “Hyphen Nation” Matthew Frye Jacobson’s “Hyphen Nation” focuses on America’s ethnic revival and the evolution of race and culture in America. Jacobson claims that the ethnic revival changed political and social culture, American textbooks and the nation’s identity, and credited the movement with the restoration of Ellis Island into its present museum. These accreditations are all justified and Jacobson presents a thorough history of proof through our nation’s progress and struggle with ethnicity and multiculturalism. The ethnic revival began with the Civil Rights Movement.
This resurgence highlights the continued importance of discussing race in the context of social inequality, discrimination, and violence. As social scientists have argued, race must be retained and utilized in our explanations of these phenomena. The reemergence of race as a key concept in contemporary popular culture suggests that there is still much work to be done in terms of creating a more just and equitable society. Only by acknowledging and addressing the ways in which race impacts our society can we hope to move towards a more equitable future. It is crucial, then, that we continue to explore and engage with the concept of race in order to better understand and challenge the systems of power that perpetuate social inequality.
In our society, racism is deeply ingrained in America. The U.S. has had a history of oppressive race-based legislation; these include slavery, concentration camps that held Japanese Americans, as well as Native Americans forcibly removed from their ancestral lands. These examples encompass a theory known as the Critical Race Theory (CRT). Following months of appeals for racial equality and anti-racism efforts, a debate over CRT erupted in 2020 about whether the concept should be taught in schools and questions arose about what the theory truly teaches. CRT can help trace racism throughout America’s history and determine how it can affect minorities through cultural perceptions of race.
Critical Summary “Racial Formations” by Michael Omi and Howard Winant discusses the definition of race, race as a social construct, racial ideology and identity, the historical development of race, and unresolved questions regarding race. The article opens with The Phipps case, which ruled that a law which “quantified racial identity” would be upheld (Omi and Winant, 1986, 12). The article describes how race is viewed from both scientific and religious standpoints. Race was used to determine the characteristics and treatment of those who did not look like the European standard.
First, Gravlee explains the cultural perception of race in the United States and how
Introduction Race is a socially constructed concept that has been used to create and justify inequalities throughout history. The idea of race has been used to create hierarchies, determine social status, and justify discriminatory practices against people who were perceived as being different. The construction of race has been based on a number of factors, including physical appearance, culture, and ancestry. In this essay, I will explore how race has been defined and acted upon historically, using examples such as the thirty-meter telescope in Hawaii, racial segregation in Levittown, the Ozawa Supreme Court case, and the Thind Supreme Court case. I will also discuss how biology has been used in the past to falsely create definitions of race
For generations, many Americans have seen their country as a haven for immigrants, a “melting pot,” of different cultures. These different cultures and traditions brought from countries across the world shaped the modern American identity, some would argue. While it is true many cultures from Europe, Africa, Latin America, etc. have contributed to molding the modern American society, immigration history is marred by resistance. Patterns in immigration throughout American history have created a culture de jour that is at the center for the most ardent opposition. From the Irish, to the Asians, and now Hispanics, it is easy to interchange the culture or race, while keeping the hysteria in any given decade from America’s past.
It is commonly acknowledged that racism is a type of injustice and that state law has the moral obligation, not just to avoid perpetrating racist acts against citizens, however, to give change to specific victims of non-state racism as an issue of public policy. Most debates over antidiscrimination law and policy focus on the degree of these obligations. As for the state 's commitment not to perpetrate racism itself, the question is whether antidiscrimination standards are fulfilled when the state stays away from all race-conscious state and non-state public activity, or whether the state should attempt race-conscious activities in specific circumstances in order to be a remedy to its own past and proceeding with racial segregation. Regarding the state 's obligation to be a remedy to non-state segregation, questions incorporate to what degree the state should come to the aid of private discrimination for any reason, and where the lines amongst open and private behavior should be drawn. These level headed discussions additionally require a meaning of what discrimination implies (Rich, 2010).
Solommon Yohannes October 5th, 2017 Sociology& 101 Mr. Woo Racial Inequality Viewed Through the Conflict Perspective Lens The racial inequality that we have in modern day blossomed from the historic oppression and comprehensive prejudice of minority groups. From the very beginning of “American” history, other groups of people who were not of European decent were discriminated against and treated inhumanely and without the smallest regard for their lives. Native American populations were decimated by diseases brought oversea by Europeans and forced from their ancestral lands by settlers to make room for their expanding populations.
Liu uses this strategy to explain to us why Americans have a hard time pulling away from traditional culture and embracing multiculturalism. This stems from the fact that in the past, politics and media coverage during the beginning of the culture wars put the two in contention. He acknowledges in the article that “The assumption was that multiculturalism sits in polar opposition to a traditional common culture” (Liu 10), in contrast, Liu wants his readers to understand that this is not the case. He also negates the mentality people hold that non whites didn’t play a role in shaping America. He uses Ronald Takaki’s argument that says, “Since well before the formation of the United States, the United States has been shaped by non whites (Liu 11)”.
In this paper, I will be critiquing these articles and films in order to evaluate the purpose of these readings and how they have helped further develop race in America. But most importantly, whether the author has achieved its purpose to inform readers about CRT, whiteness, and racial inequality. First article, I will be analyzing is Critical Race Theory: An Introduction by Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic. Both authors explore Critical Race Theory in detail. As I previously mentioned, CRT is one of the most important developments mainly in the legal studies department.
Ethnic Notions: Divided From The Start The film 'Ethnic Notions ' illustrates various ways in which African Americans were impersonated during the 19th and 20th centuries. It follows and shows the development of the rooted stereotypes which have generated bias towards African Americans. If a film of this kind had such an affectionate influence on me, it is no surprise people adopted these ideas back then. The use of new and popular media practices in those days was more than adequate in selling the black inferiority to the general public.
Race, nationality and ethnicity Race and ethnicity are seen as form of an individual’s cultural identity. Researchers have linked the concept of “race” to the discourses of social Darwinism that in essence is a categorization of “types” of people, grouping them by biological and physical characteristics, most common one being skin pigmentation. Grouping people based on their physical traits has lead in time to the phenomenon of “racialization” (or race formation), as people began to see race as more of a social construct and not a result or a category of biology.