Pros And Cons Of The Clinical Integration And Strategic Planning Process

The Accountable Care Organizations are a coordinated effort between healthcare providers to ensure the best quality of care delivered to the patients and at the same time at a reduced cost. This means that health care providers will voluntarily come together to form the ACO and patients will be able to get treated by any provider in the organization. Apart from that, it will reward the providers for delivering quality care. Even though the ACOs is comparatively a new concept, but its certain concepts and features are closely related to early managed care organizations (Barnes et al.,2014). Both MCOs and ACOs rely on the creation of physician network, promotion of member health and resource management to control costs.

How would Purnell’s model of cultural competence foster quality improvement in health care? Quality Improvement consists of systemic and continuous action that lead to measurable improvement in health care service and the health status of targeted patient groups. The Institute of Medicine(IOM) which is a recognized leaders and advisers on improving quality in health care defines quality in health care as direct correlation between the level of improved health services and the desired health outcomes of individuals and population. An importance measure of quality is the extent to which patients’ needs and expectations are met.

These partners can understand the interconnection and interconnectivity of the Public Healthcare System, which reflects the ideas of systems thinking. For example, Medicine, Community Health Centers, Public Health, Health Insurance, Legal Assistance, Consumer Advocacy Organizations, other medical professionals, the DHCS)/Medi-Cal Managed Care Division, and the County of San Diego Health and HHSA are among the partners involved in the initiative (Murtagh & Erwin, 2022). HSD makes sure that varied viewpoints and areas of expertise are considered in decision-making processes by incorporating a variety of stakeholders. Their assistance demonstrates the understanding that enhancing healthcare services requires a thorough, multi-sectoral strategy that transcends the bounds of organizations. As a result, the project offers an opportunity for many partners to share knowledge and collaborate on the development of creative solutions to better meet the requirements of the communities (Murtagh & Erwin, 2022).

Washington medical center strategic plan 2016- 2017 strategic plan overview Washington medical center has committed to a strategic planning process design to prepare the organization and the profession to respond to the rapidly changing healthcare environment. The plan will help ensure Washington medical center’s ongoing value to healthcare leaders as they worked to improve care delivery and population health. Based on input from the membership, chapter leaders and regions, the Washington medical Center board of governors has developed this strategic plan to direct organizational focus over the next three to five years. Strategic plan development and process Washington medical center conducts a systematic annual planning process to develop

Brown, (2013) argued that managed care contributes towards improved patient-physician relationship, as it gets rekindled through various methods. The managed care has the powers to improve and sustain healthy relationships between the medical practitioners and patients. Governments play a significant role, however little, for instance, catering for the services rendered by individual physicians. The choice of the suppliers also impacts the services rendered to the customers, for instance choosing suppliers that render low-quality products and services makes the clinicians deliver the same to the

The health industry we are in today, demands that health professionals retool the way they practice. To support our patients health needs and to meet the needs of regulatory bodies, we must as nurse work collaboratively to provide total patient care. A multi-disciplinary approach does not support the need the complex needs of many clients, no one health discipline can provide all the care that is need for our patients. We must therefore work collaboratively to accomplish good, quality outcomes for our patients and our organizations.

Previously, majority of healthcare systems were driven by other goals such as ensuring enhanced care access, containing the costs of healthcare delivery, and promoting patient convenience/customer service in a bid to improve the efficiency and quality of healthcare. However, the financial collapse had far-reaching consequences for the healthcare systems as it

The degree to which health care is required to integrate can only be sustained in an environment that embraces formal data governance. Within care provider systems, integration is required to consistently identify a patient to enable quality measurement, clinical decision support, performance measurement and analysis. Between care provider systems comprising the continuum of care, integration is required to recognize the same patient and collaborate to improve the health of a patient population. And across providers and payers integration is required to forge new models of payment based on accountability and

5. As healthcare leaders we model collaboration with patients and families by establishing open communication between the patient, family, and healthcare providers and listening to their insights and opinions in order to better plan and deliver care that will optimize patient outcomes and experience. We involve them in policy development and clinical decision making, share knowledge and authority with them, and establish mutual trust and

There are many stakeholders involved with health care administrations. Those stakeholders can be patients, health care physician, insurance providers, pharmaceutical manufactures, hospital organizations, community clinics and government. Each different stakeholder has their own individual vision of health care administration. This causes conflict due to the nature and differences in vision. which then can cause conflicts among each stakeholder involved.

Without system interoperability, employee productivity can be hindered, patient discharge times can skyrocket, and hard-earned IT dollars can go wasted. This can be directly attributed to the use of outdated, non-integrated systems for delivering patient care. It’s clear that system interoperability is a must for the healthcare sector. People who have chronic illnesses benefit greatly from the easy access to medical records through interoperability. These types of illnesses generally require multiple physicians and specialists.

Daniel & Rosenstein (2008) define collaboration in health care as “health care professionals assuming complementary roles and cooperatively working together, sharing responsibility for problem-solving and making decisions to formulate and carry out plans for patient care.” Finkleman (2006, cited in Ndoro, 2014) states there are many advantages of working in multidisciplinary teams, such as professionals having a greater understanding of one another’s job roles. This permits greater communication between each other. Working within a multidisciplinary team enables collaborative working and improves patient care. Although collaborative person-centred care is vital, it needs improvement.

Integral Challenges Among the challenges involved with transitioning to a PCMH model, one which is more-apparent is the shift from the tradition physician-centered care to a team-based delivery of quality patient care (Markova, Mateo, & Roth, 2012). In this situation, physicians faced issues concerning self-identity as professionals. However, because responsibility is shared among a team of two or more personnel, opportunities for professional growth and improved learning increased, as well as, job satisfaction, and staff autonomy (Markova et al., 2012). Positivity growth is potentially a result of prior issues and challenges that physicians and administrators have faced with the implementation of the PCMH model. According

Strategic planning is an extremely important process and organizational management activity for setting priorities, allocating resources, strengthening operations, making sure that employees and other stakeholders are working toward common goals, and assessing and adjusting the organization's direction as needed throughout the process. Public health organizations need to engage in strategic planning because an organizational strategic plan sets a course for strengthening community health to effectively carry out its public health functions. For those who are in charge of overseeing the strategic planning process, it provides a guide to distributing financial and human resources in addition to creating measurable targets so that progress can

The work of health service administrators directly impact the delivery service of health care and they continue to be a key factor in the health care changes. Having a wide range of health care knowledge that is accurate, credible and up-to-date is crucial to for the health administrators in order to have a positive impact on the organization. Information is Power: How Hospitals Administrators Research Online, is