Behind ever great country there is a strong central government. To a country that just took its independence from an empire, there should be a document to allow a strong central government and rule of law. Powers should be divided equally among the branches of government. First, I summarize the main points of the Articles of Confederation. Then I will focus on the cons of the Article of Confederation and was it the right decision that America should have relied on this paper or should they have had a constitution?
The Articles of Confederation was the first written constitution of the United States which was took place right after Declaration of Independence. Representatives from all thirteen states of America came together to write a paper called" The Article of Confederation of the United States of America." Every state had its own rights to have their own supreme power and to govern, limit to the rights of granted to Congress. All the thirteen states agreed to defend each other with having a good and prosper partnership. All the citizens of the states have the right to citizenship, and any citizen of any state does a crime but flees to other states must be
…show more content…
For instance, they could not have any diplomacy, have an army or navy, talk peace or make union between states. However, they were allowed to levy taxes on their imports and exports as long as they do not interfere with foreign treaties. Every state had the right to have a national "militia" group for the defense of the state. During any national war that would threat the United States of America, legislature from all states had the right to appoint officers or colonel rank for the defense of the states. Congress had to pay all the expenses of war from the money which the state contributed the value of their lands. Congress is the last resort to solve any disputes, but has the limit right to hold trials for
As Armitage states “Each of the 13 states had a vote in the weak national Congress while a vote of 9 states was required in order to pass any laws and a unanimous vote of all 13 states was required for the Articles to be amended.” This gave all of the new states extreme power to make their own laws and pass them while defanging the new central government. It could not raise an army, collect taxes, regulate trade between the states or foreign trade markets, or force states to follow laws it set. The Constituion addresses these weaknesses by declaring that the new Federal Government had enumerated powers that were explicitly listed in Article One, Section 8 of the
1a. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress didn’t have the power to tax the colonies so their only option was to request the states for money, which often ended in rejection. Because Congress had so little money to regulate the army/navy and resolve crises, they sold off western lands and printed worthless print money in desperate attempts to do without money. The constitution solves this dilemma by giving Congress the power to make revenue through taxing and borrowing and also the power to appropriate funds.
4- With the articles of confederation the federal government could not levy taxes so they had to ask the states for money to pay off the war debts. 2- While from a point of view part of what you said is true, however states could levy taxes providing somewhat of an income/budget for public works to be built within states. Including schools, roads, attractions...
The articles of Confederation were drafted with an aim to succeed, but there were some allocations that were not considered. The first concern that was not considered was how powerful the federal government was supposed to be. The founding fathers knew that confederation was going to make the United States a unit, which means that decisions such as international relations, was to be controlled centrally. The congress and the executive were not given sufficient powers to engage military action. The congress had to borrow military empowerment from the states.
The Articles of Confederation were the first document created after the American Revolution. The Articles of Confederation were problematic for the nation because they gave to much power to the states. For instance, the articles did not include a central banking system, no executive, legislative, nor judicial branch of federal government. Therefore, the power of the country resided in the states, and this lead to an ambiguous nation with no stability. For example, some states were creating their own money and negotiated deals with other countries that did not include all the other states.
The British monarchy’s control over the American territory had left a flavor of distrust for power in the palate of Americans. The British set the precedent for the American political system. After the colonial period, the colonies agreed that there was nothing to fear more than the government, or in this case the king. Britain over the years has held its unitary form of government, which in this case means that all governmental power resided within the hands of a single branch. In this type of system, the legislature has all the power to create and enforce legislation.
Under the Articles, there was little authority in government, Congress could request money from States, however they had no power to tax them. A unanimous approval from
The Articles of Confederation, first adopted in 1781, represented the former colonist’s first attempt to establish a new government after the Revolutionary War. Some of the problems Americans faced after the Revolutionary War were problems with governmental debt that remained when the war was over. Soon Americans started to find disadvantages to the Articles of Confederation, which they considered changes that could possibly improve the economic strengths of the nation, allowing the composition of trade barriers among the states would discourage specialization and lower voluntary trade. The lack of dependable source of revenues for the central government would make it strenuous for the newer nation to defend themselves from attack, which is
The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution of the United States. The Articles were ratified in 1781. The Articles were a loose union under authority of congress. They had three purposes; to declare war, raise an army, and so sign treaties. There were many strengths as well as many weaknesses that came out of the Articles.
The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution are two important documents in American history that established the foundation for the current system of government in the United States. While both documents aimed to establish a functioning government, they differ greatly in their approach to governance and the protection of individual liberties. The Articles of Confederation, adopted in 1777, were the first constitution of the United States and provided a framework for a loose confederation of states. Under the Articles, the central government was relatively weak and had limited powers, with the states retaining most of the power. The government had no power to regulate commerce, levy taxes, or enforce laws.
Congress had no power, so states had no reliance on a central power. States could obey or disobey any laws they wanted. No foreign affairs head was in place either. America was left with no diplomat and no head to their chicken. National government was forced to rely on states for militias, laws, and nearly everything.
(1) During the years 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation were created in order to provide a means for an effective government for the United States. Since they were a newly formed independent nation, they required in having a stable government that help keep the country organized. The eleven states would create a document that would become the Articles of Confederation. From the start it would only crash and burn for it had a weak central government that did not contain an executive or judicial branch that we do today, which would make the state governments handle their own affairs. The reason behind such a poorly implemented document was due to the fact that the colonists did not seek to have a government that would merely replace one
The Articles of Confederation were a document seen as the “first” constitution of the United States. This document granted the new national government power to control the military, declare war, and create treaties between the states. However, the Articles had holes in it considering the government did not have the power to tax, create laws without at least nine states’ approval, or change the Articles of Confederation without a unanimous vote. This means that the country soon fell into debt and petty arguments between state, the new government had no control. It was time for a change.
The Articles of Confederation was an agreement among the thirteen original states of the United States that served as the first constitution. The Articles had first been introduced by Richard Henry Lee in the Second Continental Congress. Although the Articles of Confederation has made its contributions throughout history, the Articles, however, did not last very long and had been proven inadequate from the very start. I agree with this statement based on the examples and analysis of the Constitution I will soon provide. The Articles of Confederation were written during a time when the American people feared a strong national government.
The Articles of the Confederation was the first government constitution that the United States used, and, although there were strength like the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, there were major weaknesses of the Articles of the Confederation like the following: requiring 9 out of the 13 colonial votes from the representatives from different states to pass a law; having no executive and judicial branch; and the federal government being unable to impose tax revenue onto the states. Such flaws would eventually lead to the Constitution and the repeal of the articles, for the Constitution was a measure to fix the problems of the articles with a stronger government that allowed them to impose taxes and and implement new laws for a more effective government.