Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Electoral College

Abrogate the Electoral College immediately. The Electoral College is a formal body of 538 electors who determine the President and Vice President of the United States of America. The system was established in Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution for the reason of keeping a balance between the election of the President by a vote in Congress and a popular vote of citizenry. Copious amounts of controversy have been surrounding the subject ever since its date of inauguration. The Electoral College should be abolished because it does not serve democracy, the presidential outcome is able to be altered by just the Electoral College–not the majority–and an appreciable amount of the U.S. population believes the Electoral College should be terminated.

I think we should keep the Electoral College. Electoral College is defined in our textbook as; “An unofficial term that refers to the electors who cast the states’ electoral votes” (Patterson, T.E., 2013). Electoral voting is tied in with the states popular voting. Choosing electoral college adds to the cohesiveness of the nation by obliging an appropriation of popular support to be elected President, improves the status of minority interests, contributes to the political dependability of the country by promising a two-party system, and keeps up an elected arrangement of government and representation (Kimberling, W.C., 2008). I think that the Electoral College system is a big part of the cohesiveness of our country and it requires the distribution

Electoral College has been in United States for a long period of time. The system was formed to select a president through an indirect election and to avoid suspicion of corruption and belief of compromised votes, but the Electoral College never worked as it was intended to work by founding fathers. There are many pros and cons for this system but one of the major con of this system is that people in the U.S. doesn’t think that their opinions about choosing president really matters because of the Electoral College and I also feel the same way about it. I think there are more cons of Electoral College than pros. One the major con is that people in U.S don’t feel that their vote matters because Electoral College redistributes its vote every

211). If the issue of reforming or abolishing the electoral college is one that opposes the United States Constitution, then we have to look at how many times that has been amended. The Constitution has been amended twenty-seven times over the course of history for better or for worse. This amendment of the electoral college could play a vital role in the future of American democracy. If the electoral college was abolished and direct popular vote was put into place it would eliminate the influence of “unconstitutional” voting results.

One of the most popular reasons why we should keep the electoral system is that it gives small states an equal opportunity. If the president was elected through popular vote the areas of America with more population would rule the White House. But in the electoral college the smaller states have a more equal vote. Small states can make a big difference when it comes to tight elections and because of that candidates cannot ignore the smaller states. But if we had the popular vote system the candidates would only travel to bigger states with a larger population.

As it currently stands, the presidential democracy of the United States government is one where the people’s beliefs are generally well represented. All members of Congress are elected by the people along with the two people at the head of the executive branch. This way, the people have a lot of control over what takes place in their country. If the Constitution of the United States were to be rewritten, the removal of the electoral college should be seriously considered.

If we somehow happened to be a capable vote, then we ought to have the capacity to really pick who might be president. The Electoral College removes that from us. The Electoral College is not by any stretch of the imagination reasonable for our rights and our opportunity. It, for the most part, takes away the ability to vote the president. The Electoral College was made in a period when votes were harder to gather and number.

Others may think their votes go wasted, due to the “winner-takes-all” method in use for the majority of states, such as a voter voting for Al Gore might of believed in the election of 2000, being Bush won the majority of electoral votes while Gore won the popular vote. However, it is erroneous to believe their votes go wasted, being they were simply cast on the losing side of the popular vote within the state, even more provided by the electoral college which preserves federalism by representing states as evenly as possible, thus protecting small states it does not waste votes being it grants all states a justifiable amount of electoral votes in correspondence with their population. In addition, if it was based on national popular vote only, would people assert that their vote for Bush went wasted, as a result of Gore’s victory? Furthermore, the electoral college preserves federalism by promoting a national consensus on our choice for president, being it leads to candidates seeking national coalition, thus enabling them to win with the majority of electoral votes and eliciting the correct president to maintain stability in the union. Although, some may say the electoral college is undemocratic or goes against the will of the people, being a candidate might win presidency as a result of the majority of electoral votes but have less popular votes than the opposing candidate.

Also, I think that we should get rid of the popular vote. There are so many reasons why we need an Electoral College. The Electoral College keeps the coastal elites from basically choosing whoever they want for president. Many people often get mistaken and believe that the Founders wanted a popular vote and power to the people, however, nowhere in the constitution does it say anything about that. If there wasn’t an Electoral College then the smaller states would be at a complete disadvantage.

Once the foundation of this institution had been laid out, the Electoral College went through two iterations - one before political parties were created and one after. The former involved a complicated series of events that would ensure the votes of the members of the Electoral College were fair and just without both political parties and national campaigns (Kimberling). The latter involved the creation of the 12th amendment (“requiring one vote for president and a separate vote for vice president”) in order to accommodate for the formation of political parties (Kimberling). Since then, the Electoral College has been proposed to be reformed or eliminated “700 times in the past 200 years” in order to get to the institution we know today (“U.S. Electoral College”). Thus, despite the overwhelming backlash over the last 200 years, the Electoral College still stands proud as our defining presidential election

The Founding Fathers ruled out a national popular vote because back then there was no good way to communicate information about candidates so they thought that people would only vote for candidates that they knew or the most popular person in the group and not the most eligible candidate. Even now, with all resources available to them, many voters- mostly younger people- vote for a person without knowing anything about their policies; the electoral college prevents voters like this from electing a leader they know nothing about. “According to Alexander Hamilton, the Electoral College is if ‘not perfect, it is at least excellent,’ because it ensures that the office of president will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.” (The Electoral College- Top 3 Pros

All of these are good things, but they do not outweigh the system we currently have. As the great Burt Lance said, “If it aint broke, don’t fix it.” In conclusion, the Electoral College system is essential to ensure that all states have equal representation in the election process, provide a clear winner, make sure that the President and Vice President are elected by most of the country, and are elected by a diverse group of people. Despite the criticisms that the system has received, we should maintain the Electoral College system to ensure that our democracy is fair, representative, and

All through the history of the United States of America, many people have discussed the abolishment of the Electoral College. For many reasons, some believe it is what makes our country have the type of government we have, some believe that it's what limits the power of the government, and many people such as Mitch McConnell believes it is what gives us our freedom and prosperity. While these are valid arguments there is a multitude of reasons to why the electoral college should be abolished. Such as there is only a need for twelve states in order to become the president, popular vote of the people for president can still lose, and the Swing states are given too much power and attention compared to that of the other states. This is why I believe in the abolishment of the Electoral College.

Electoral College has maintained for hundreds of years and it’s time for a change because of the more and more serious problems it is causing. These are some reasons why we should consider replacing this system with a new more efficient one. Firstly, Electoral College creates the possibility for the candidate who loses the popular vote but wins the electoral vote to become president. In the much-publicized election of 2000, Vice President Al Gore beat Governor George W. Bush by more than 500,000 votes in the national popular tally but lost in the Electoral College because of a last-minute, 537-vote margin in Florida .

Several years after the United States came to be, the Constitutional Convention met to determine how the new nation should govern itself. The delegates saw that it was crucial to have a president and vice president, but the delegates did not want these offices to reflect how the colonies were treated under the British rule. The delegates believed that the president’s power should be limited, and that he should be chosen through the system known as the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a body of people who represent the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the electing of the president and vice president. Many citizens feel that the Electoral College goes against our nation’s principle of representative democracy, while others