Pros And Cons For Gun Control

1839 Words8 Pages

Gun Control Debate Brief I. Gun Control - There should be federal laws that restrict the number and/or type of guns that citizens can own. (Negative) II. Introduction A. Importance - Since the founding of our country, people have had the right to keep and bear arms under the The Second Amendment. The Second Amendment reads “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment of the Constitution was enforced so people could defend themselves if the British tried to take away their freedom. Through the 20th and the early 21st century, gun control has been a very controversial issue. Some people think that the use of guns should be banned because of the …show more content…

Evidence - According to MotherJones.com, “there have been at least 69 mass shootings in the last three decades—and most of the killers got their guns legally.” 75% of the guns used for mass shootings are obtained legally. The information recorded of the details of the most recent mass shootings prove that they included firearms purchased from legal gun dealerships. Firearms can be obtained too easily and the absence of stricter firearm laws is the absence of safety in the U.S. b. The point of gun control is to make sure that it’s safe for citizens to purchase firearms, and prevent felons and people who are mentally ill from purchasing them. However without stricter rules/laws, anybody can purchase a firearm. Evidence - In 1989, California banned the possession of semiautomatic firearms prior to the massacre of five children. Stricter laws were made in order to prevent further massacres. According to CNN (http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/16/us/20-deadliest-mass-shootings-in-u-s-history-fast-facts/) from the years 1949 to the present 25+ mass shootings have

Open Document