Persuasive Speech: Surveillance Cameras

The article, “Austin serial bomber may have other devices 'out there,' cops uncover 'treasure trove of information” -by Travis Fedschun- has a lot of information on the recent explosions. Mark Conditt was named the serial bomber in the Texas bombings on wednesday, March 21, 2018. Mark blew himself up when SWAT cars were chasing him down the highway in Texas. The police had evidence that he was the bomber because he was found on surveillance camera at the Fedex delivering two packages. He was also seen on surveillance camera at the local home depot buying the materials to create bombs.

Police worn body cameras are a very big part of policing now, they are increasingly being shown on the media to show that police are attempting to improve the relationships between the public and police. Police body cameras have been and will continue to be a controversial topic in policing because of the issues with privacy laws and how everyone stopped by police will be recorded. In this paper, it will discuss more in depth about the positives and negatives of police worn body cameras and a conclusion from the evidence collected. The use of body cameras in policing has been around since the early 2000’s, but as of late police body cameras have become increasingly implemented over the last couple years, but these

By using strong supporting arguments In the essay entitled, Everyone is Watching You, by Nadine Strossen. Strossen’s goal in the essay is to influence her readers that surveillance cameras do more damage than good, and that something needs to be done to eliminate them. Her controversy on this matter was very vigorous, Strossen convincingly argues that surveillance cameras are an atrocious idea and needs to be stopped. She does a satisfying job of catering to her viewers in her essay. With a topic that pertains to everybody, she takes the opportunity to use this to her convenience.

By being conscious of their every move being watched, officers will be careful not to make any obscene choices when on duty. The cameras will be beneficial to both the officers, and the public as they take careful measures to make good

Though these cameras have a big price tag, they are a piece of equipment all officers need to wear in order to maintain a more clear picture of what happens in an incident. Most normal people tend to have better behavior when they know they are being watched or recorded (Erstad). A growing amount of proof suggests

Individuals within the society see body cameras interfering with police officers’ and citizens’ privacy, much training, and policy are needed when trying to incorporate cameras, and a large number of money and resources the are required to carry out this program. ⇒Privacy is one trouble about recording the interaction between officers and citizens. As mention previously, body cameras are meant to make officers more translucent. But on the other hand, are regular day-to-day people being able to free see videos freely without looking to see if it contains any sensitive and private footage? For instance, an individual who did not agree with an officer’s action, therefore, requested the film captured from the body camera.

Taking a video is a part of most people's everyday lives in America. Everyone uses their cameras for something different whether it’s for a picture with a friend or for a video of their pets. Cameras let people keep memories along with history. The use of police cameras will improve the behavior of police officers and suspects, can make for more accountable reports and be used as evidence in the court, and can reduce the complaints of the public.

“I do not believe that all police officers are bad, nor do I believe that most are bad. But there must be a transparent, impartial, and fair system to judge those that engage in criminal or unethical acts. ”- Al Sharpton In my opinion, all police officers need to have body cameras on ,while they are on-duty.

As in our regular life style being observed by cameras is fairly common. Every store has cameras that are mainly for safety, but yet we are not fully safe. Those cameras could be use to spy and kidnap people. The

It is very important to use surveillance, but if you use it unjustly it can give more power to public order than individual rights. It causes a similar problem as the ones mentioned before, that it can prove challenging to identify if you had a good reason to use surveillance. You might not always know if you have a good enough reason to use surveillance, but you should exercise your best judgement to decide whether or not to use

Speech Outline Title: Body Cameras I. Introduction Attention-getter: Body cameras were used because of Michael Brown’s death and police misconduct. B. Significance Body cameras may increase police accountability and protect them from accusations. C. Credibility: My interest in this topic is due to the latest deadly encounters with police officers and improving the communities’ safety.

C’mon Make Law Enforcement Cameras Mandatory Law enforcement cameras should be mandatory to catch criminals doing illegal actions and in doing so can keep the environment safer for everyone. Law enforcement cameras should be mandatory because they help catch the people that are doing illegal things that can disturb and also be dangerous to other people. The cameras can catch people stealing, shooting things that are not suppose to shot at, and also people jumping others in alleys and sketchy neighborhoods especially. The cameras can be good because if a cop was wearing a body camera and did something wrong, like all the police brutality cases on the news, the camera will actually catch them doing the crime and then they can’t deny doing

"To what extent should governments be allowed to monitor their citizens in the name of protecting the general public, and through what measures? Do domestic surveillance programs such as screenings at the airport, CCTV cameras, and domestic drones actually keep us safer?" The government should be able to monitor us as citizens to protect us not only from terrorist and foreign harm, but also to protect us from ourselves. We have more problems with domestic violence and crimes that can be prevented by video surveillance.

How Crime Prevention Pays Off American Military University Professor Bell CMRJ306 – Criminal Investigation January 20, 2018 Abstract This paper will identify and examine the new technology as well as other ideas that have been brought to light to assist these different crime prevention techniques and programs last. This paper is intended to show the long-standing history of crime prevention and the reasons it came to be as well as how it is intended to work. Also shown will the the different classifications  in regards to crime prevention in the tripartite public health model.

In American one of the freedoms we hold most dear is our right to privacy. Some people would argue that our privacy is being infringed upon through the use of surveillance equipment by private business and government officials. However, video footage of public spaces protects our freedoms, saves tax dollars and provides a measure of safety to patrons. First, citizens in America enjoy the ability to go where they wish to go at a time convenient to their schedule. In providing surveillance in public areas, people are free to enjoy working or recreating at any given hour of the day or night.