Persuasive Essay On The Electoral College

I think we should keep the Electoral College. Electoral College is defined in our textbook as; “An unofficial term that refers to the electors who cast the states’ electoral votes” (Patterson, T.E., 2013). Electoral voting is tied in with the states popular voting. Choosing electoral college adds to the cohesiveness of the nation by obliging an appropriation of popular support to be elected President, improves the status of minority interests, contributes to the political dependability of the country by promising a two-party system, and keeps up an elected arrangement of government and representation (Kimberling, W.C., 2008). I think that the Electoral College system is a big part of the cohesiveness of our country and it requires the distribution

The Electoral College should be abolished because of the occasions where presidents have won without popular vote, the number of electoral votes each state gets, today people are more educated and their vote should be counted one person, one vote. There have been four occasions where the president elected did not win the majority vote because of the Electoral College. One of the four elections was in 1824 when John Quincy Adams was elected president even though he did not receive the majority vote. He received 84 electoral votes, Henry Clay received 37, Andrew Jackson received 99 and William Crawford received 41. None of the four candidates received 51% if electoral college so the vote went to the House of Representatives.

Even though the Electoral College has been here since the beginning of the establishment of the U.S I believe it should be abolished. As a U.S citizen does your vote matter to who is elected? Every four years the United States has a presidential election. Your vote for the presidential nominee is considered to fall into the category of a popular vote.

The Electoral College should come to an end because it disregards the popular vote, it was built on racism and sexism, and it creates a power imbalance between electors. Many people may think that the Electoral College helps out voting system. However, people's votes don't count, which creates a false sense of security. The Founding Fathers were some of the greatest men in history, right? Wrong.

The Electoral College is a fair process of government for everyone. The Electoral College is a trustworthy method of government. Certainly, this way is a fair to the citizens, the states and the country. If the government was to develop a new system it may not give everyone this power. The Electoral College also helps uniformed voters not have a have a huge say in government.

The electoral college has always successfully chosen a president and benefited small states. However, in the more recent years there has been much debate as to whether or not this system works for our country. There have been five times when the winner of the popular vote loses the election leaving citizens wondering

According to History.com, the Electoral College works in this

According to Posner, “The Electoral College restores some of the weight in the political balance that large states lose by virtue of the mal-apportionment of the Senate decreed in the Constitution” (Posner). Although the electoral college does prevent some states from having too much power, it also gives immense power to other states, such as Texas, Florida, and California. Another concern for people that support the electoral college is that it helps control swing states from having too much pull. Despite some states having a stronger pull in the voting system, switching to a popular voting system would negate the swing state concept and help each individual citizen proclaim in own political believes, despite the state he/she lives in. William discusses the 2008 election and states, “It 's time for a national popular vote.

The electoral college creates "Certainty of Results"(Electoral College: Pros & Cons) where it is easier to count, and make sure the count is correct, under 600 votes, as opposed to the billion or so that comes from popular vote. This allows the candidate to call for a "recount" where they are able to count up the votes and make sure that there was no missed votes or misunderstandings which may have been lingering within the vote. The Electoral College also limits the candidate’s ability to pander to certain states or cities for their votes, rather they can appeal to many states, for they all have equal roles. Overall, the Electoral College is a great addition to our republic, and I believe it could be improved, but keep the same

I understand how this makes the election process quicker and organized but what happened to all American people voices being heard and their votes should count regardless. Conclusion: Reforming the Electoral College system is much needed because I think for the Presidential Election; the votes of the qualified citizens should count. By using National Popular Vote system, it would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate, who receives the most popular votes in all the states. The national popular voting system make all states competitive in presidential elections and makes every vote

When people vote for a president they are actually voting for presidential electors, known as the electoral college. The electors get chosen by the people who elect the chief executive. These electors are the ones electing the candidate for your state. Right now the number of electors per state is from 3-54. This leads to a total of 538.

Electoral College Position Paper Defining a new system of government after a revolution is no easy task, even for the revered founding fathers of the United States. Ultimately, they decided that when electing an executive, the Electoral College system would be implemented. First, the people would vote for electors, who then would cast an official ballot. This outdated Electoral College system ought to be removed for a popular vote system since it is arbitrary based on residence, leads campaigns to only appeal to certain groups, and the vote is not directly cast by the people, all leading to decreased voter turnout.

Several years after the United States came to be, the Constitutional Convention met to determine how the new nation should govern itself. The delegates saw that it was crucial to have a president and vice president, but the delegates did not want these offices to reflect how the colonies were treated under the British rule. The delegates believed that the president’s power should be limited, and that he should be chosen through the system known as the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a body of people who represent the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the electing of the president and vice president. Many citizens feel that the Electoral College goes against our nation’s principle of representative democracy, while others

In Ohio, for instance, Republicans won 12 out of 16 House races "despite voters casting only 52 percent of their vote for Republican congressional candidates. " The situation was even more egregious to the north. " Michiganders cast over 240,000 more votes for Democratic congressional candidates than Republicans, but still elected a 9-5 Republican delegation to Congress."”. This manipulation of the system is certainly not what the framers of the constitution had in mind and makes the electoral college system less and less reliable. This along with faithless electors, the men and women who truly vote for president, in 21 states do not have to vote for the popular candidate and usually the electors side with their party but is it right that on their whim, they can undo the will of thoughts of people.

It is also believed that the Electoral College makes potential voters not want to vote at all and they end up not representing their candidates. And most people already have a certainty of the outcome of the election, meaning they already know who will win the election based on the number of votes so far in the popular votes section and the electoral section. The system of electors is also not fair because the people can not control who they are voting for has the electors, and the states number of electors are equal to the number of people on its congressional delegation, which gives big states an advantage over small states. To conclude this letter, I again say that the Electoral College should be changed to election by popular vote because, popular vote is fairer then the Electoral College, the people have no power compared to the electors and the are subject to corruption with in the