Personal Information Breach Research Paper

In Greene’s Case, they had Ms. Lawson sign a confidentiality agreement that was disregarded by the defendant. Although the accused became distraught with the loss of her position, it was wrong to relay the information regarding ever-gold to a competitor. c) Facts to be

The University of Notre Dame argues that they do not owe Letitia Hayden a duty to protect her from the third party’s actions. The reasoning behind this was that the actions of a third party are unforeseeable, therefore Notre Dame owed Letitia Hayden no duty to anticipate the actions and protect her. Therefore, Notre Dame is not liable. Holdings

Memorandum To: Attorney of Jennifer Lawson From: Jackson Biegler Date: October 7, 2017 Re: Greene’s Jewelry Wholesale v. Jennifer Lawson for Breach of Contract Application of the Law to the Facts Greene’s defense should build its case around precedence and law while being shielded by public policy. Greene’s defensive position is precise and to the point, as Greene’s is in the process of suing Ms. Lawson for her part in breach of confidentiality for contacting Howell shortly after being fired from their company. Ms. Lawson offered to work for Howell, a direct competitor of Greene’s and provided Howell with confidential information about Ever-gold.

In “Avatars, Scarlet ‘A’s, and Adultery in the Technological Age” by an Assistant Professor of Law Sandi S. Varnado explore the new increasing twist on the age-old issue of adultery and online infidelity by using technology that causes many divorces between marriages. Nowadays people have love affairs using the Internet, specifically to communicate with others. According to Varnado, she reports that in December 2012 a survey revealed that 81% of all adults in the United States use the Internet, which has impacted our society in both positive and negative ways (372). Varnado also emphasizes that given the appearance and prevalence of online sexual satisfaction, it is not difficult to imagine that many Internet users are engaging in online. When

Conseco Grp. Risk Mgmt. Co. v. Ahrens Fin. Sys., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2306, at *1. Ultimately, the Court held that in matters involving public concern, whether private or public figure, a plaintiff was required to show actual malice in order to recover presumed or punitive damages.

Teresa's case was submitted to the jury on the counts alleging breach of contract, negligence and wantonness, and the tort of outrage.   The jury returned a verdict against Akins and in favor of both plaintiffs.   The jury assessed compensatory damages at $450,000 and punitive damages at $150,000, for a total of $600,000 in Megan's case; in Teresa's case, the jury assessed compensatory damages of $200,000 and punitive damages of $150,000, for a total of $350,000.”

Due to the defendant’s negligence and lack of regard for safety, the court found that the defendant did owe a duty of care to the

Online Social Networks The topic I decided to choose for my Rogerian Proposal is “Online Social Networks” Online social network sites enable people throughout the world to link with others who share similar interests. Online Social Network allows members the opportunity to post updates, pictures, videos, and other material and share this information with designated recipients. The vast popularity of these websites has produced a number of issues, from privacy and safety concerns to questions regarding the long-term societal effect of online exchanges.

Social media are web technologies that permit individuals to interface impart and connect progressively to share and trade data. This incorporates Facebook, websites, Twitter, email etc. (Social Media and Electronic Communication, 2012). The nurse taking his particular case and excuse to media compromises the confidentiality and privacy of the patient. The privacy of the patient was breached by the instance of the nurse taking the matter to social platforms.

Due to this minors are able to use the website without the knowledge of the website, this means that it is still restricted for sex offenders solely because of the possibility of a minor being present on the site. This restricts almost every website including college sign-up websites, amazon, and even google search engine. The internet is such a part of human life that it is now considered a basic human right by the united nations. If the law is so broad that sex offenders are advised to just avoid it entirely, then they are being denied the basic human rights that all people have. According to Amnesty International “Human rights are basic rights and freedoms that all people are entitled to regardless of

The rapid proliferation of information technology has led to a significant rise in the number of people who use the internet in one way or another. With the growth in the number of persons who have an internet connection; certain individuals have begun to exploit this resource through the unethical practice of Identity theft. As more and more individuals are posting their personal information online, cybercriminals are stealing this information with the aim of assuming the victim's identity so as to either obtain financial advantage or benefits that are associated with the victim (Jewkes, 2013). The act of stealing other people's identity cannot be considered as ethical because it violates the victim's right to privacy.

“Once you’ve lost your privacy, you realize you’ve lost an extremely valuable thing” - Billy Graham. “Invasion of privacy is a legal term. It is used to describe a circumstance where an individual or organization knowingly intrudes upon a person. The intrusion occurs when the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as in a bathroom or locker room”(Winston). There are many factors that help with the loss of privacy these days.

Then, it also can cause public and personal embarrassment. While the level of embarrassment may not be as public as it was for someone famous, it is still enough to damage someone’s personal life. This can lead to further torture for the victim as it may cause them to be ridiculed by their peers. These issues that are caused by catfishing are so dangerous because of the damage they can cause. The damage can often be magnified by the fragile state that a person is usually in because of the trust and love they feel for the person they think they are corresponding with.

Also, she says that the majority of companies are using tools which help them see the accounts of its employees B. Sub point B: cause 2: In the article on howstuffworks.com written by Dave Roos, he says that hacking on social media requires a few technical skills. it does not require many technical skills because some people are not aware of privacy settings or they just decide not to use it. Also, he says that hacking an account in social media is a psychological game because the only thing they need to unlock the account is the information they have on their profiles.

They were giving so much to a complete stranger, like money, where at the end they could not do anything about it because the damage was already done and they did not know anything about the real person since they were living in a fantasy. Others say that minors using social media gives them a chance to express their inner thoughts as a sort of freedom. However, they get carried away with this freedom using it as an excuse to meet others and post personal information. It is an easy access to learn everything about a person like the things they like, where they study, their family, and many