Ben Miller
Kevin Oberlin
Eng. 2235
6/11/23
Pattern Analysis of “The Essay Vanishes”
Within this convoluted and confusing text lies a pattern that I have never seen before. In the written paragraphs lie a strange pattern of using vague examples followed by a depressing and vague explanation of worthlessness and despair. In the non-paragraph sections of the essay lies either images of text, a list of deceased or missing people, some short phrases further separated by an asterisk and other styles. Although the pattern of the essay is rather strange or even vaguely non-existent, the author uses this odd pattern to convey an overall message; one meant to be interpreted by the reader as in my eyes is, when does something “actually” disappear?
…show more content…
One example of this is in which he describes the way in which he wrote his ideas for his cyberpunk novel, “The red pen, too (so dramatic!)” (Monson 192). This simple, maybe playful, sentence in which he is describing his medium of writing with the red pen, and follows the description of his yellow legal pad, is then followed up by a rather bleak and self-criticizing sentence; “But it’s my embarrassment. It’s still recognizable” (Monson 192). Within this series of sentences the author establishes that although he felt embarrassed by his medium in the past, it still lingers with him today only to haunt him as he’s writing. Another example in which this style pops up is in which Monson is speaking about the sexless, nameless baby, “... you should count my tiny fingers or give me a frickin’ cookie or give me the dignity of a name before I disappear again” (Monson 190). This sentence starts out in a playful demeanor in which he is possibly saying what the baby would be saying, then he takes a dark serious turn with the phrase of “give me the dignity of a name before I disappear again” (Monson 190). This style of his writing not only helps give off his message in a relaxed, maybe nonchalant manner, but by doing this he could also be writing in this style to connect with his readers more and to surprise them with subtle surprises such as the baby speaking about disappearing, which also ties in with the pattern and theme of the
The tone that he uses when he introducing a new idea to the reader is very formal and contemplative. For example “Many modern and postmodern texts are essentially ironic … to illustrate a disparity or disruption,” sounds signicantly more sophisticated than, “I lived for a good while not knowing where that phrase came from, although to the extent I thought about it, I was pretty sure. (Foster, pg. 37). (Foster, pg. 38). This shift in tone is very significant to the way the reader connects with the author.
Sunlight poured through a hole in the ceiling, a few weeds growing in the debris where light touched the floor.” This quote describes the abandoned school while still producing a feeling of emptiness. The school, which surely was filled with life, was left desgared and
By that, he intends to teach that patterns are certain phenomena that reoccur in different literary work which can be explicated further by acquiring a neutral perspective towards the story. For giving a comprehensive example in order to explain what a pattern is, the author proposes Oedipal Complex, which is the condition of a male child who feels sexual desire towards his mother. He argues that a professional who has observed this situation on several cases would force his or her memory to find the resemblances between these cases and realise that it is a pattern. Indeed, that is what Freud did before introducing the concept Oedipus Complex to the world. Likewise, D. H. Lawrence noted this pattern and built his story, ‘The Rocking Horse Winner’ on the same basis.
For instance, in Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451, the narrator narrates “And he remembered thinking then that if she died, he was certain he wouldn’t cry” (Bradbury 19). Guy Montag's wife Mildred is used to her seashells to the point where she is emotionless causing an estranged relationship with her husband, Montag. Technology caused Mildred to become distant to the point that they barely know each other anymore. Not only was Mildred able to be easily influenced, but so was Montag. In the society of Fahrenheit 451, “He suddenly couldn’t remember if he had known this or not, and it made him quite irritable” (Bradbury 3).
" Short Story Criticism, edited by Joseph Palmisano, vol. 70, Gale, 2004. undefined, undefined. Originally published in The Explicator, vol. 57, no. 3, Spring 1999, pp. 179-181. Wegs, Joyce M."”Don’t
A rhetorical analysis of: “For many restaurant workers, fair conditions not on menu”, an editorial published in February, 2014 by The Boston Globe, reveals the author’s use of classic rhetorical appeals to be heavily supported with facts, including focused logos arguments. “For many restaurant workers, fair conditions not on menu” is a Boston Globe editorial published in February 2014 by author/editor Kathleen Kingsbury. Kingsbury is a Pulitzer prize winning author and is currently the deputy managing editor (The Boston Globe). “For many restaurant workers, fair conditions not on menu” aims to inform the reader of the hardships that minimum wage restaurant workers in the United States have to face and steps that could be taken to solve these issues. The article focuses in on the wage gap,
This informality style of writing lifts the stress of the reader as if it’s a regular conversation. Another illustration of colloquial language is found in Torture Might
Authors do this for a number of reasons, but one big reason is that authors try to hint to readers what it is that they mean because they can’t directly express the frame of mind they are in so they give readers a puzzle to try to solve. This is called symbolism which helps readers come up with an idea of what the audience thinks he's talking about using his deliberate messages throughout the text. For example, Tyner states in his poem, “Fingers grow orange / from the powder of our breakfast…” (6-7). The dirty fingers growing orange represent the inherited mess that ends up being the outcome of the conflict that pollutes the community.
For instance, the author uses grim diction and ellipsis to show suspense and to portray the horrific actions that occurred. Elie Wiesel was able to use ellipses and specific diction to display the time in which he got beaten 25 times for meddling in Idek’s affair with a Polish girl. “‘One… two…,’ he counted. He took his time between each stroke. Only
Unbroken The author wrote this story to inform the reader of the life of Louis Zamperini, while also telling the story in an entertaining way. Hillenbrand demonstrated the main idea throughout the book by using rhetorical devices such as diction, syntax, imagery, and tone. Hillenbrand’s use of these rhetorical devices contribute to the book Unbroken by emphasizing the main character, Louis “Louie” Zamperini’s, life before, during, and after becoming a prisoner of war.
He then proceeds with “snatch a coin” (9). At this point, the reader’s and author’s tones are shown. The reader’s tone is disrespectful because they can see him steal money from his mom’s purse. The author’s tone is playful because he thinks it is a funny story to tell about himself. Another example is “I won’t be eating” (13).
For instance, in “Shooting an Elephant,” George Orwell claims that when a white man becomes tyrant, he destroys his own freedom. In order to prove his purpose, Orwell establishes authority through personal details, shifts in verb tense, and a reflective tone; appeals to logic with metaphor and analogy; and creates an emotional connection with the audience through a self-deprecating tone and vivid imagery. In the opening of “Shooting an Elephant,” Orwell appeals to authority through personal details and shifts in verb tense that create a reflective tone. Specifically, the speaker first introduces himself: “I was sub-divisional police officer of the town…” (1).
One example of this in the reading was when he used this to describe the beauty and view of a horizon. He stated that so many people have come and go, limping on crutches or dieing, and were heroes from many wars. Then while stating the different wars, he uses this device to empathize the amount of people who came and went by listing the many wars with the conjunction or in between each one, such as, the Pacific or Europe or Korea or Vietnam or the Persian Gulf wars. A third use of a rhetorical device that I noticed throughout the reading was the author's use of euphemism. This is when the author substitutes a word for another that is more pleasant so that he or she does not come off as rude and can avoid conflict in with the readers of the story.
For example, Twain creates humor by using hyperboles and understatement, while Douglass uses no emotional words or word choice. Twain used a lighthearted yet semi-serious tone in his writing to give the best description of the story as possible. “[...] instantly a negro drayman, famous for his quick eye and prodigious voice, lifts up the cry, "S-t-e-a-mboat a-comin'!" and the scene changes!” This shows the semi-serious tone of Twain’s text.
This is a literary analysis on the novel 1984 by George Orwell. 1984 is a more recent classic dystopian novel. Written in 1949, it's based in the future year of what is presumed to be 1984. It focuses on the life of Winston Smith, a member of the newly established Party that rules over a territory called Oceania and that is led by a man called Big Brother. This novel provides a rather frightening insight into a dystopian socialist environment.