Parthenon Vs Pantheon Research Paper

483 Words2 Pages

There are two iconic structures in the world today; one was built by the Greeks and the other by the Romans. The Greeks gave us the Parthenon, and the Romans gave us the Pantheon. These buildings are visited by millions of people every year. Here I will discuss the similarities as well as the differences found in both buildings.

First up is the Parthenon. The Parthenon was commissioned by the Greeks politician, Perikles, as a temple to Athena. The construction started after the Peloponnesian war had destroyed many of Greece's temples and other buildings. The Parthenon was built in the Doric order. This means that there were low steps on every side of the building as well as Doric columns. The building was rectangular, as well. In terms of …show more content…

The Greeks also used it to house the treasury. Throughout the ages, the function of the Parthenon has never changed. We will see that this is different from the Pantheon.

The Pantheon is a Roman structure that has been rebuilt several times. It is believed that the initial construction was by Agrippa, and that he made it for personal use as a temple. Since then, the Pantheon has been rebuilt and has gone through many changes. Originally, the Pantheon was thought to be a temple to "many gods." It has since been converted to a Catholic church, which is what it is currently used as. It can also be considered a mausoleum, as there are two kings and a queen buried there.

In terms appearance and construction, the Pantheon is interesting. It consists of a circular building with a large front porch featuring Corinthian columns. There used to be steps leading up to the building, as with the Parthenon, but those have since been removed. The most striking feature of the Pantheon would be the unreinforced concrete dome. This particular part of the Pantheon is so interesting because it is unique in Roman architecture. There are no other buildings with this same

Open Document