Throughout If I Die in a Combat Zone, Box Me Up and Ship Me Home, Tim O’Brien talks of how atrocious and mistaken he feels his time being drafted and shipped to Vietnam was. His reasoning for writing the book is to assert his position that America’s interference in Vietnam was unjustified by showing the true story, with no shortcomings, of life in war, using philosophical teachings of Plato to exemplify unwise courage, and giving dialogue with superiors on the politics of the war. The brutality of war is described graphically as to create a true account of the war and provide basis for his beliefs. The author uses his grizzly account of the life as a troop in Vietnam as a sturdy base for his point. To illustrate, he talks of pieces of his …show more content…
This leads him through schemes of disappearing until he finally winds up debating a Captain serving as a Chaplain on the base. They argue about politics and O’Brien brings up the point that there is no validity for involvement, as there’s no persuasive affirmation saying that if the U.S. wins the war, Vietnam will be a better place (ch. 6). Assuming the U.S. did win, the dictator in power, Ngo Dinh Diem, is a catholic leader in a largely Buddhist country. Unity would be nearly impossible with Diem as a leader. This is reflected by the fact that he only won power of Southern Vietnam through the help of the U.S. rigging the election in his favor. Maybe the people in Vietnam didn’t want to be ruled by communists, but under somebody like Diem, an informally fought war would have probably never found a conclusion. In the same discussion with the Chaplain in chapter 6, O’Brien argues that the lives being lost due to the U.S. taking action are overall not worth it for either country. On the fight to stop communism America got nothing but a large price tag and many dead soldiers of it’s own. Similarly in Vietnam, America’s participation brought nothing but an extension of war time, and millions of it’s own people dead. O’Brien proves correct in his preemptive assessment of the conflict. He again adds to his credibility during the debate by countering the Chaplains emotional responses with submitting that he is only convinced by facts and conclusive evidence. This shows he is in touch with reality and the points he is making have solid ground to them. By doing this, his argument, again, garners more
Tim O’Brien writes us a wonderful fictional tale of a platoon of men in vietnam during the vietnam war, The Things They Carried shows the reader that when the men are over in this distant and strange land, not only do they carry physical objects, but emotional baggage and ideas that truly make, or break a man in war. Tim and his men show several signs of stress and turmoil while fighting the war, and while they survive they begin to understand what is really means to live, die, and what is right, and wrong. While over in vietnam the men are in a war, not a simple skirmish or fight, but a full on war against an enemy that they were not sure they are the enemy. The men would walk from location from location seeing what there is to do and trying
Tim O’Brien is a novelist and a retired soldier from the Vietnam War. He wrote a semi-autobiographical novel titled, The Things They Carried, in a format that seemed as if we were in the novel itself. As readers continue with this novel one can envision and have the impression of deaths and all the effects war has on a soldier from the war. O’Brien explores the effect of war on an individual through fictionalized stories he tells in this novel in order to show how humans can change through drastic events that happen to them due to the war. Being in a war affects the way we think and the people we love.
Tim O’Brien uses seemingly true events to describe his overall emotions about the Vietnam war and what he and others did there. “I want you to know what I felt. I want you to know why story-truth is truer sometimes than happening-truth” (O’Brien, pg. 171). This quotation is the foundation of the entire book The Things They Carried, O’Brien uses this base to tell the story of many things that he witnessed. O’Brien’s verisimilitude is used to give real world emotions to a literary work.
Madelyn Smith Ms.Reid English 11 Law 25 April, 2023 The Vietnam War was a horrifyingly gruesome and deadly altercation in which America sent hundreds of thousands of kids to fight in a grown man's war. Close to 60,000 American soldiers and 250,000 Vietnamese soldiers were killed in this fight of nonsense, in which the lives of innocent civilians and soldiers alike were taken, all while making no political progress. In the historical fiction, The Things They Carried, Tim O’Brien presents stories that show how the soldiers cope with the war, in order to depict the trauma and horror they experienced, ultimately illustrating that the soldiers who went to Vietnam lived through horrid battles and show their fear of uncertainties through their
In A Viet Cong Memoir, we receive excellent first hands accounts of events that unfolded in Vietnam during the Vietnam War from the author of this autobiography: Truong Nhu Tang. Truong was Vietnamese at heart, growing up in Saigon, but he studied in Paris for a time where he met and learned from the future leader Ho Chi Minh. Truong was able to learn from Ho Chi Minh’s revolutionary ideas and gain a great political perspective of the conflicts arising in Vietnam during the war. His autobiography shows the readers the perspective of the average Vietnamese citizen (especially those involved with the NLF) and the attitudes towards war with the United States. In the book, Truong exclaims that although many people may say the Americans never lost on the battlefield in Vietnam — it is irrelevant.
In If I Die In A Combat Zone, author Tim O’Brien argued that the Vietnam War was immoral through the evil it placed on others lives, how poorly justified it was, and how the war desensitized the soldiers to death. Although Tim O’Brien came from a background of parents who fought in the Navy and were active in war, he was a protestor of the Vietnam war along with any war that had no good cause behind it. He was being drafted into a war that he didn’t want to take any part in. To O’Brien, the war was plain evil in every shape or form.
O’Brien who was drafted for the Vietnam War, questions why he is present in the Vietnam War, and how the wars form in the first place. “A war of national liberation or simple aggression? Who started it, and when, and why? What really happened to the USS Maddox on that dark night in the Gulf of Tonkin? Was Ho Chi Minh a Communist stooge, or nationalist savior, or both, or neither?
Being drafted as a young man, his tour began in 1969 as a foot soldier and ended his tour in 1970. During a grenade attack, O’Brien was hit with shrapnel and was sent home, in which he later received the Purple Heart. O’Brien tells his side on how he felt during this time period and the struggles of Vietnam. The book itself sets the scene in the time period of Vietnam and gives a sense of fear as he explains the horrific and graphic events that occurred while on his tour. As a way to cope with the long lasting memories, pain, and effects of the war, O’Brien began to write about the ordeals he went through as a young man in the Vietnam War and the honorable men who he served with.
He fought a war in Vietnam that he knew nothing about, all he knew was that, “Certain blood was being shed for uncertain reasons” (38). He realized that he put his life on the line for a war that is surrounded in controversy and questions. Through reading The Things They Carried, it was easy to feel connected to the characters; to feel their sorrow, confusion, and pain. O’Briens ability to make his readers feel as though they are actually there in the war zones with him is a unique ability that not every author possess.
The Things They Carried, written by Tim O’Brien, illustrates the experiences of a man and his comrades throughout the war in Vietnam. Tim O’Brien actually served in the war, so he had a phenomenal background when it came to telling the true story about the war. In his novel, Tim O’Brien uses imagery to portray every necessary detail about the war and provide the reader with a true depiction of the war in Vietnam. O’Brien starts out the book by describing everything he and his comrades carry around with them during the war. Immediately once the book starts, so does his use of imagery.
A minority fled to Canada, but the majority accepted their fate and started counting the days until their trip on the “Freedom Bird”, the plane that took soldiers from Vietnam back home. In the heat of battle, one of the biggest temptations was to simply “go limp and tumble to the ground … until your buddies picked you up and lifted you into a chopper [that would] carry you off [home].” (21) But despite such temptation, the soldiers carry on and not “one ever fell” (21). Instead, they hide their fears of death in order to maintain dignity.
People get so caught up in what others think and expect of them that they let it completely control the decisions they make. The soldiers in “The Things They Carried” have a fear of looking weak and cowardice. They let this fear and their pride control them even if it is not what they want. Tim O’Brien, Norman Bowker, and Curt Lemon are examples of soldiers who let fear control them. The soldiers fear that the people close to them and around them will discover their weaknesses.
O’brien was against the Vietnam War before and after got drafted. As a student, O’brien took a stand against the war, and participated the anti-war protest. In the Chapter, “On The Rainy River,” O’brien is talking about how he thought about fleeing to Canada when he received the draft notice. O’brien had a full-ride scholarship for grad studies at Harvard when he received the draft notice and he could not believed it because he was to smart to go war. Furthermore, he “hated dirt and tents and mosquitoes” ( O’Brien 39), he was not a soldier materiel.
The Vietnam War leaves a legacy of moral confusion with each and every soldier who serves. Soldiers are fighting for a cause they do not necessarily believe in, killing people who do not necessarily deserve it, and watching their brothers die beside them. Tim O’Briens’ book, The Things They Carried, illustrates the soldiers struggle to define morality throughout the confusion of the war. On the Rainy River, Tim O’Brien faces what he feels is his moral obligation to answer his country’s call and fight in Vietnam, and a personal moral issue with the reason for the war.
I find Ho Chi Minh’s letter far more persuasive than Lyndon B. Johnson’s. Using ethos, pathos, and logos, he forms a solid argument that supports Vietnam’s stance on the war. He appeals to one’s emotions by expressing the injustices faced by his people, writing, “In South Viet-Nam a half-million American soldiers and soldiers from the satellite countries have resorted to the most barbarous methods of warfare, such as napalm, chemicals, and poison gases in order to massacre our fellow countrymen, destroy the crops, and wipe out villages.” Words such as “massacre” and “barbarous” highlight the severity of these crimes, and invoke feelings of guilt and remorse in the reader. Chi Minh uses ethos to support his logos, or logical, views on the