Neither A Wallflower Nor A Paris Parer Be Summary

817 Words4 Pages

According to the article, “Neither a Wallflower Nor a Paris Geller Be” (Rebecca Schuman, Slate Magazine, 14 Oct 14), in order to be a successful student, class participation is the key aspect of college students. Additionally, Schuman explains that taking part in the class is to experiment with new thoughts, banter about, and examine. It is not to win a type of splendid comment challenge, she argues. Regardless of whether by the timid, hesitant, or excited. Agreeing to Schuman you ought to connect a gathering venture where, indeed, a few people from the gathering are more brilliant than others. However, where the achievements of the whole class matter more than the individual. Schuman shares her personal experience of teaching and dealing with different kinds of students in hope that her intended audience will learn a lesson of the importance of class participation. Her views are very instructive, truthful, and encouraging to all college students.
The article was elegantly well written by Schuman, who directed college student how to take part in the course and benefit from it. Because of appropriate explanations of her teaching experience and references, I found the article to be thought-provoking. For example, she used this characters Tracy Flick, Paris Geller, and Darrin floen as references to show different genres of student’s behavior. Although Schuman seemed to be pretty instructive and caring throughout the article, she was very strict and demanding about students '

Open Document