The fight for payment of college athletes has not been quick one as more and more issues keep popping up. The NCAA has never allowed payment of its athletes, but small steps towards the overall goal has questioned the NCAA’s past. Its’ decisions has stayed constant since its founding in 1906. The first issue in this decision would not occur until 1952 when the NCAA ruled to give The University of Kentucky the ‘death penalty’ for paying their athletes. This ‘death penalty’ is a one year program ban from participation, the harshest penalty the NCAA can give. The NCAA website clearly states that amateurism is essential in their programs. They require all athletes to adhere to their code of being an amature. In 2008, the first major footstep was …show more content…
Schools use their athletes for advertisements in an attempt to increase ticket sales for athletics or to increase enrollment. The NCAA would also use players images in products such as videogames in an effort to make money. Former UCLA basketball player Ed O 'Bannon realized this was not right and in 2014, he filed a lawsuit against the NCAA requesting compensation. John Stevens, an author for the Associated Press, states the details of the case when he says “In a case led by former UCLA basketball star Ed O 'Bannon, U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken blocks the NCAA from making rules that deny players the right to compensation when their images are used commercially, for example, in video games and telecasts. Her ruling could allow some players to receive as much as $20,000 when they leave school. The NCAA has appealed.” The NCAA had one simple solution to this problem and that was to remove player images from all commercial use. This has resulted in the cancellation of popular videogames such as ‘NCAA Football’ or ‘NCAA Basketball’ and is also resulted in the removal of names from all NCAA athletic apparel sold to the public such as jerseys. To say that NCAA teams make their schools millions of dollars is an understatement. USA Today and Stanley Eitzen calculated how much money National Basketball League Hall of Fame member and former Georgetown basketball player Patrick Ewing made Georgetown during his college career. The article, titled Slaves of Big-Time College Sports, states “...[A]n analysis of the economic impact of basketball star Patrick Ewing to Georgetown University during his four years there in the early 1980s shows that he brought more than $12,000,000 to the school (a tripling of attendance, increased television revenues, and qualifying for the NCAA tournament each year). Meanwhile, the cost to Georgetown for Ewing 's services totaled $48,600--providing a
Opponents say college athletes would be back payed for letting other businesses use their images, but they are already being compensated. Colleges that give athletes scholarships to attend their schools already pay the students by letting them get an education for free. In the words of researchers Ben
With the revenue quickly escalating, college athletes appear more as employees because of the money they are generating for their school program (Berry III,
Will Davidson ENGL 1120 11/16/17 Major Paper III College athletics is a defining activity in American culture. Whether it is during the brisk Saturdays of fall watching the gridiron, or during the spring where the best in basketball compete for the title of the best, College Athletics is iconic for our nation. They provide relief from daily life, something to look forward to, and serve as a gathering point for friends and family to enjoy each-others company. With all college sports give back to the people, many have wondered if the athletes which make it all possible should be paid. Some argue that college athletes should remain amateurs, as that makes the unique spirit of the game different than the current pro leagues.
American colleges student athletes getting paid is a highly debated topic. Joe Nocera and Bob Williams argue this issue, in the article “should college athletes be paid.” Although the athletes are making money for the school, college athletes should not get paid because the students are getting their college paid for, and paying students to play would shift their focus away from academics. Student athletes put in many hours of work for the team and school. In the article, it states “Indeed, they often do not get much of an education because the team comes.
Over time, college sports evolved into a multi-billion dollar industry, with universities and the NCAA reaping significant financial gains from ticket sales, sponsorships, and merchandise. Despite this, student athletes are still considered amateur participants, with the NCAA maintaining strict rules against paying athletes for their participation. This has led to a growing movement advocating for the recognition of student athletes as employees, as they are essential to the success of college sports. The legal and ethical arguments surrounding the employee status of student athletes are complex and
College is a place for students to obtain a college degree and help them to get ahead on their “real world” careers. Athletic departments in college have become huge money incomes in the past ten years; college football and basketball are even shown on the television. This has resulted in many believing these athletes deserve to be paid for their contribution to the schools athletic income. However athletes in college are given the opportunity to play the sport that they love as well as receive a top education. For some players a $20,000+ per year tuition is not enough, they want to be paid with more than just a scholarship.
For example, Ed O’Bannon a former UCLA basketball star, sued N.C.C.A for using his name in television broadcasting and video games. (Tracy and Strauss,2015) This case went to the United States Court of Appeals to be addressed about the antitrust law for using the name of players and on television and video games. (Strauss,2015) Former and current players wanted compensation because many time football and basketball players bring in the revenue through broadcast games and making merchandising deals. With the court ruling sided with the
Meanwhile, the NCAA makes $11 billion from a contract with CBS. The benefits that these players are collecting “have led to a black market for compensating athletes” (Birkenes and
These students lead to believe that they will be compensated for their abilities with a quality education that will be paid for with scholarship funds. Instead they often find that they participate in a minimal academic program to allow for excessive hours of practice and travel for sports participation. While scholarships may cover the majority of the scholastic financial burden they do not account for the cost of living for an unemployed student athlete. The National Collegiate Athletic Association profits millions of dollars off the skills of it’s players and until recently was not required to share any of this monetary gain with these students. Careful consideration should be given to rulings prohibiting student athletes from receiving financial reimbursement for collegiate play.
Every year the NCAA makes around one billion dollars (Alesia). While the NCAA as a whole made this sum of money other leagues like the NHL (National Hockey League) make only around two-hundred and seventeen dollars (Badenhausen). Most of their profits come from TV advertising and licences. This is supported by figure B (Revenue). While the NCAA is making a billion dollars a year, it is the colleges that receive most of that capita.
Is it equivocal for the NCAA to produce more than $1 billion and for the players, who are the ones who are generating majority of the revenue, to not get paid a single penny? This topic has been widely debated for the past few years, and in “Viewpoint: College Athletes Should Be Paid,” Raman Mama sets forward an argument in favor of the monetary payment of college athletes. The title of the article clearly demonstrates what the author’s intended goal is in writing this article and it seems as if the audience of the article is the general population. In this persuasion article, the author fittingly appeals to two of the three modes of persuasion: pathos and logos. The author appeals to pathos in discussion of the bankruptcy of many professional
In the documentary schooled: the price of college sports I learned that the NCAA does not treat student athletes like employees but these students are treated like slaves it all started in 1971 when the young Caucasian man by name of started playing college football for TSU, he was the running back for the team and when he caught the ball in running he was hit by two other players from the opposing team which caused him to be paralyzed for the rest of his life. Most of the players feel that they should be paid for playing college sports but the NCAA believes that a student who gets a full scholarship to play any sport at a university should not be paid because they are being paid with a free education, room, and board, and free meals, the NCAA
In the 2013-14 seasons, the NBA grossed $4.79 billion in revenues. That’s over 100 times more than an average NBA player makes in his whole career. NCAA men’s basketball tournament accumulated $1.15 billion in ad revenue, $200 million more than the NBA Playoffs that same year. Despite the staggering profit numbers they generated, tournament participants did not receive one cent for their efforts. The NCAA currently resides in a state of pure hypocrisy.
Are they students or employees? They spend more time with the sport than in school. Student athletes should be acknowledged for their performances. College athletes should be paid to play because they bring money into the school, advertisement, and they perform the same tasks of pros. College kids bring in thousands of dollars every game day.
Amateurism in college athletics is an exploitation of the athletes who participate in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) sports. The amount of work that is done by these athletes to help their respective institutions generate millions of dollars in revenue, goes seemingly unnoticed when identifying the substantial amount of money flow in NCAA sports and the amount of people, from stakeholders to alumni, that benefit from this source. Amateurism, the foundation of NCAA sports, has been in place for over a century of time dating back to the early 1900s. Any athlete who is making money for work they’ve done outside of their institution is not being exploited, however, an athlete can easily be placed on the other end of the spectrum when he or she is withheld from recognizing the true monetary value of their talents and likeness that are being used for the profit of the school or others. The NCAA is understandably satisfied with the continuous growth of its’ revenue each year, yet the problem they face of having people accept that “student-athletes” are just amateurs is growing as well.