Mr. Salvarez Case Study

There was discussion of judicial review in Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton, which explained that the federal courts would have the power of judicial review. Hamilton stated that under the Constitution, the federal judiciary would have the power to declare laws unconstitutional. He also stated that this was appropriate because it would protect the people against abuse of power by Congress.

One more similarity

The argument/famous Supreme Court case Madison vs. Marbury asked us the question should the Judicial Branch be able to declare laws unconstitutional. I think the Judicial Branch should be able to declare a law unconstitutional. I believe this because the judicial branch is very small, they have no other checks on any other branch, and they don’t receive any money. The Judicial Branch is so small.

For example, one similarity they have is that they both go to school. In addition, they both take care of the same two babies Lupe and Pepe. Also, Esperanza and Isabel were both born in Mexico where there primary language is Spanish, which makes both of them not English speakers. On some pages as we can see that everyone in Esperanza and Isabel’s family speaks

Ms. Ramirez came to the office for the scheduled office visit. She stated that Yahaira was with her brother. The SW created a timeline with Ms. Ramirez about her life. Ms. Ramirez stated by saying that when she was 4 years old, her sister was born and she had to take her.

This means if a lower court makes a decision that a party disagrees with, they can file an appeal to a higher court. The higher court aka the supreme court can then review the lower courts decision and either uphold it or reverse it. For instances a very controversial case, Roe v. Wade, was overturned by the supreme court which caused uproar in society. The judicial branch had/ has the power to dictate a women’s body, they have the ability to control a women’s choice. To take this a step further what if said women resides within the other branches; the judicial branch is ultimately able to control women’s bodies that belong to the other branches in a sense.

One more similarity

One of the similarities is, “They both embody the principles of representative democratic government.” They both contain popular sovereignty, checks and

Alex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.

We both act differently in each situation that we are in and that has shaped our identity. Melinda and I are different in many ways, but we are also similar. The first piece of evidence to show how we are similar is that we express ourselves differently in different situations that we are in. We both express ourselves differently when we are at school versus when we are at home.

No one would 've ever thought that s/he were similar to a person that lives across the Pacific or atlantic, or even a person across the globe. Actually, s/he might be similar to the person across the globe. Seedfolks by Paul Fleischman and “Human Family” by Maya Angelou both share a common them, even though they talk about two tremendously different topics. This theme is that even with high-scale differences, people can nevertheless recognize similarities with others. Maya Angelou shows the theme by showing that everyone has a diverse lifestyle, but the lifestyle is made up of common things.

The fault in this lies in the motivation behind the justices’ decisions; with judicial activism, it is nearly impossible to view law as objective and free of bias. Many fear that in acting as policy makers, justices bring their own partialities and beliefs into account instead of allowing the literal interpretation of the Constitution guide their decisions. On the other hand, judicial restraint can also be used when deciding cases. Judicial restraint refers to justices interpreting the United States Constitution word for word, keeping from bringing their own beliefs or biases into account and most importantly refraining from assuming the role of policy maker. Under judicial restraint, justices work to uphold the laws that are already in place and to maintain the laws as they stand except in the event that they are blatantly unconstitutional.

Another similarity is that Canada and the United States are both democratic, as well as federal states. Both of the countries share and have many cultural similarities, but they also have very different ways they are made, as well as very different processes and as well as laws that govern each

There will always be different views and opinions when it comes to government politics. One interesting view is whether or not our nation is led by an Elite or Popular Democracy. A democracy is a form of government that is run by elected officials that are voted into public office by the people for representation. There are different perspectives on how a democratic system should work.

Aaron Salomon was successful leather merchant that specializes in the manufacture of leather shoes, for many years ran his job as a trader and sole. At the time, it was a legal requirement for inclusion at least seven people participate as members, partners of the company. Mr. Salomon, CEO himself. Mr. Solomon owned 20,001 of the 20,007 shares of the company - with the participation of the remaining six individually among six shareholders (wife, daughter and four sons).