Weddings and marriages today look very different from those held during the Elizabethan times. Some rituals seen in the Elizabethan weddings are no longer done in modern day weddings; modern day marriages no longer have arranged marriages, brides do not marry at a young age, and brides do not have a dowry.
One major aspect of Elizabethan weddings that is no longer seen in modern day weddings is arranged marriages. Some of the arranged marriages that went on during this time were organized at the birth of the child. In most cases, the women’s father would select the man he thought was most eligible for his daughter, but in other cases he would select the spouse he would most benefit from. It was very common very for the bride to first lay her eyes on her husband on the day of the wedding (wedding customs).
In today’s society, it is very uncommon for one to hear about at a girl marrying at 12 or 13 years, but during the
…show more content…
Women were known as second class citizens. Women who were single for some reason were known as “witches” by their peers. Single women relied on their male relatives to support them (Alchin).
The main difference between Elizabethan weddings and modern day weddings is with modern day weddings one has the choice of selecting their own spouse. In modern day weddings, parents do not have a say in who their child marries. This a great change seeing that Elizabethan weddings where totally opposite of today’s weddings. Elizabethan weddings mostly did not allow women to have a say in who they were to marry.
Another difference between modern day and Elizabethan weddings is the proposal. In modern marriages, the man usually proposes to the woman with a diamond ring. This leaves the woman with the option to accept or to deny the man’s proposal. If the woman accepts she would then put on her new wedding ring and the preparation of the wedding
Women from the 18th century had moral ques that was a embedded as a part of society at this time. This was the idea that women would typically get married, have children and take care of the home. Elizabeth did follow the status quo to a certain
After reading the prologue of the Wife of Bath’s Tale, it didn’t greatly astonished me. I don’t pictured women in the Middle Ages as second class citizens. In my opinion, they had more rights in Europe than they would in the Middle East or Africa today. If their husbands died, the wives were able to owe the land; the oldest child, despite being male or female, would inherit from their father; and can receive high positions (of course, not as high as the men). The most famous of all women in the Middle Ages is Eleanor of Aquitaine and Joan of Arc.
In, Marriage in the Jewish Tradition, by Blu Greenberg, a Jewish marriage “is a change in personal status. Neither sacrament nor mere legal transaction, it enjoys the trappings of…the richness of ceremony and rite” (7). The rite of passage of a Jewish wedding symbolizes the transition “between the couple and their families, and especially the separation of the girl-youth from her family and her joining her husband’s family” (Sharaby 41). The couple experience a moment where they are neither married nor single before they reach their new identity. In Van Gennep’s timeline of rites of passage, a Jewish wedding follows the three main stages.
Marriages were arranged by the parents of the young couple. A
Elizabeth is the most critical of how marriages are carried out compared to all other family members and acquaintances; as a result of this, she contains prejudice towards others such as Darcy, which causes her to explode with fury when marriages have been unethically conducted. Elizabeth believes in the importance of having a deep and meaningful connection with the person whom you marry and that the wealth and power one has is too influential of a factor when considering marriage. Therefore, the most important quote in chapters 27 and 28 is “I am sick of them all. Thank Heaven! I am going tomorrow where I shall find a man who has not one agreeable quality, who has neither manner nor sense to recommend him.
A man was able to chastise his wife if he felt the need, as long as he was not cruel and did not inflict bodily harm, but a woman was never allowed to chastise her husband. Women were also not allowed to enter the professions with the exception being women could work in domestic services (Thomas). Another thing men could do that women could not was inherit family property (“Daily Life in the Elizabethan Era”). Women were not allowed to inherit property and so the oldest son inherited everything (Alchin). Women were also not allowed to act on the public stage or write for the public stage.
The family plays a huge role in the wedding ceremony and as such, the bride and groom are described as part of their families coming together and accepting one another. Cultures that are high in institutional collectivism try and make decisions that is best for the group rather than the individual person (Lustig & Koester, 2013). Since the marriages are often arranged by the families, they make decisions that are in the best interest of the family. This is different from when an individual choices for themselves a spouse because they do so based on their own interest, not often taking into account the interest of their
While the others are not too ready for that big commitment. However in this time, it was normal for all of the different opinions among people. It was also common for parents to decide when and who their child got to marry. It is easy to see that when you look at Juliet and her mother. Her mother is telling her to get a move on and get married, while Juliet thinks so little about marriage.
Arranged marriages are not a new concept, having been around since the ancient times, nor are they extinct in today’s world. The general idea behind it is guaranteeing the parents’ choice of a spouse for their children and they take into account multiple variables when choosing a potential mate for their children. “The Family” by Alessandra Strozzi reveals the behind the scenes of a proposed arranged marriage in the Italian Renaissance. While today, it seems silly to Western civilizations to have arranged marriages, doing so in that period was common. Whether it was for convenience, power or just simply keeping up the prestige of the family, we know of these types of marriages occurred through these documents.
According to arranged marriages| Modern/Basics an arranged marriage was required during the Renaissance times, whereas today they are viewed as just more of a very strong opinion for whom an individual should marry. In very few cases couples are now obligated to get married. The core reason for an arranged marriage today is for a brides and groom’s happiness or what they believe. In the Renaissance time, many couples would first meet each other on the day of the wedding. Today, that is very uncommon; couples now have time to meet and get to know each other.
In Shakespeare’s play Romeo and Juliet, the young couple gets married when Juliet is fourteen years old. In the fifteen century, during Romeo and Juliet’s time, marriage at a young age was extremely common, whereas in modern times many people get married close to thirty. Age is not the only wedding custom that differs today. Unlike the fifteenth century, in today’s society people are able to marry anyone they choose, people marry for much different reasons, and what is expected from the couple’s families have changed. Romeo and Juliet shows that marriage in the fifteenth century is between a man and women, and must be approved by the two families coming together in matrimony.
Many of the most famous people in English literature have come from the Elizabethan Era. Like all the other eras in English history, the Elizabethan had many notable similarities and contrasts with the present day. One significant remark of the Elizabethan era and our time is the role of women. During that era, women were obliged to sit still and look pretty. Women did not go to school and were educated only by their mothers.
According to William E. Mead ‘the evils of matrimony, […], were a favourite theme in the Middle Ages’ . This means that marriage was a recurring topic and especially marriages that had trials and problems to overcome. Indeed, in the Canterbury Tales Chaucer uses for some of his tales the setting of marriage. In this essay, the Wife of Bath’s Prologue and the Franklin’s Tale will be used to demonstrate how Chaucer represented marriage and what possible functions could it have. With functions I mean in the texts as part of the plot as well as how marriage functions as a plot device.
In England there is a huge diversity, but they have themselves helped to create, they are the ones who have colonized many countries, which thus led to people from countries fleeing away. Now we live in a globalized world where anything can happen, including in this narrative, there are some who are forcibly married to each other, there is 25 years’ difference on one and his bride. This just shows we are different and the culture and tradition you have, care must be taken to bring somewhere else, since it can be perceived incorrectly, although it is not wrong