Michael Cullington's Essay: Does Texting Affect Writing?

In her essay "Does Texting Affect Writing?", Michaela Cullington presents her argument that texting does not impact formal writing written by students. She discusses the concerns presented by many people about how texting language can transfer into writing, but through the use of personal experiences and credible sources she discusses how this is not true. Her use of multiple different studies and situations help boost her argument and allow the reader to truly see how students actually do formal writing. She presents a strong argument as to why those who believe students don't have the control and knowledge to write formally, instead of with text speak, are wrong.

The influence of textspeak on teenagers' writing is a polarising concept with both fans and critics of texting weighing their opinions. In her essay, "Does Texting Affect Writing?", Michaela Cullington, a previous student of Marywood University in Pennsylvania, outlines her investigation into whether or not texting affects writing. Cullington analyzes the critiques of texting and why critics believe that texting has a detrimental affect on teenager writing. Along with the critics,

Michaela Cullington was a former student at University in Pennsylvania when she wrote the essay of “Does Texting Affect Writing?” Have you ever thought if texting truly effects our writing style when it comes to college levels? Cullington did research of her own from different people group asking this question. Her thesis sentence was “IT TAKES OVER OUR LIVES” (…). The way that she capitalized all the letters is something that can engage the reader and the curiosity of knowing what is taking our lives?

In her essay “Does Texting Affect Writing?” Michaela Cullington addresses the issue of text messaging possibly causing poor communication skills and the use of textspeak, abbreviations used during text messaging such as “LOL” and “g2g,” in students’ formal writing. Cullington argues that “texting actually has a minimal effect on student writing” (pg. 367). She addresses the opposition directly, even citing credible sources. However, she also cites credible sources with better information to support her point, and even conducts an experiment of her own.

Not So Fast” Andrea Lunsford researched students’ writing for 30-plus years to see what effect new technology has on how students learn. Lunsford discovered that students are actually improving their own writing skills with the help of mass media. Not only does it allow students more access to educational resources and information, but it also encourages students to do more creative thinking and writing outside of class which Lunsford refers to in her article as “life writing.” In her research she recalls the account of a student who sent a friend a text message which was completely informal and would be considered unprofessional by most piers. However, the same student also sent a very formal and professional report to her faculty adviser later on.

In fact, people are still able to bond using technology, it can help people to keep in touch, and it can be used to help people cherish what is important to them. As long as humans do not abuse it, electronics can simply be used as a new way to interact with one another. Unlike the outcomes of “The Veldt” and “The Pedestrian”, technology does not have to consume or ruin lives. People should encourage one another to use the modern items at their disposal without uninformed cynics claiming that they are living life

But in texting, all your doing is tapping a screen or keyboard to tell someone hey or what are you doing. Sometimes people use texting for communicating to colleagues from work and sometimes there own boss. Evidence shows that people who spend less time texting have a better understanding in class or other activities that require thinking. In my opinion, texting is killing writing because

1. Texting is seen as bad because people will cut words short and misspell things in order to save time. This can become a force of habit leading kids to not be able to write very well. Not being able to write very well leads to poor grades in school. 2.

In "Cursive Is a Twenty-First Century Dinosaur" the author makes the point that writing is irrevelant due to techology. That in fact might be true but writing will always be the same concept and never changes like techology. According to passage 4 of " Cursive is a twenty-first century dinosaur" techology is moving at a rapid pace that soon even keyboards will go extinct. Inconclusion, i feel that writing has far more benefits than modern techology. Techology is always advancing that we 'll soon have to keep up with the vast amount of changes that happens.

Since the invention of these machines, humans have been able to achieve tasks that otherwise seemed impossible. Technology enabled people to be in touch with each other frequently at anytime, anywhere. Also, it helps the world economically as companies gain more profit, and error free results. Likewise, politically, it has become a crucial aspect of elections as it has created direct contact between politicians and their supporters as well as aiding candidates in spreading news, and updates on future and ongoing plans. Therefore, technology has made tremendous contributions to today’s

For years, there have been many debates on whether texting ruins the literacy skills of a person. Some say that the use of ‘text talk’ (or the use of abbreviations) is the primary cause. On the other hand, there are others who disagree and say the use of ‘text talk’ improves such skills in our youth. “Texting is thought to have either negative or positive effects on students’ literacy skills. When asked their opinion, educators said that the believed that texting has had a negative effect on students’ writing skills” (Verheijen).

The study has found that common texting by teenagers can influence their literacy negatively due to the fact that they don’t practice the correct grammatical way of spelling. The lower grades especially showed to be affected the most, perhaps because they have been exposed to texting at a much earlier age and can therefore not spell correctly. The main limitations to the study were the ability to access the grade 9 IEB results and find a date and time that suited all parties in the experiment. For future recommendations to similar studies, learners who said they do not text regularly could be tested as well to compare the results and obtain more accurate results proving the thesis

It has allowed us to communicate in way we never thought possible. I can talk to my sister, that lives in Australia with a simple click of a button. Technology has allowed us to have a proximity with our loved ones who are not with us and certainly filled the void, when it came to missing someone. It has also allowed for easier channels of communication in companies and families with emails and conference calls. But, even with all of this evolution in the technology field, many people still like that face to face contact and so I think that even with all of the technology in the world being able to improve communication, there will always be a degree to which it is effective and at some point can even be

According to Turkel, this is setting society up for trouble when it comes to relating to each other as humans, but also, in our ability for self-reflection. For example, Turkel explains the problem that society has with having conversations with other people in person and, not having control over real-time responses to the discussion. But with the digital tech, Turkel says we can edit, delete, and overthink the debate to a point where we actually change our position. I agree with that the digital world is isolating people from the real world because of my experiences with technology and the effects it has on our social interaction, our awareness of our surroundings, and it is robbing young adults from the wonders of the world. I believe we should try and continue to have faith in real human relationships because, if we forget how to have relationships with other people, then we seem to stop caring about one

Does technology unite or separate people? Some think that technology unites, because it shortens distances. Others say it separates, it avoids physical contact and face-to-face communication. In this article I explain my point of view about the situation that exists in our society today where technology is critical as a means that we supposedly harms our relations, family, friends and people in general, in the other hand I will explain that not only the technology have the blame in this social problem.