Medicare Sociale Essay

The public has always been in favour of creating an insured medical system, but the first notable efforts made by Canadian citizens were in British Columbia when the soldiers returned from World War I. Many soldiers who were wounded and treated abroad wondered why Canada did not have a system like the ones in the countries that they had battled in, as the care that they received abroad was much better than any care that they had ever received in Canada.1 That is when the pressure was on the government for a reform, but the government did not see this as a priority and continued to push it off. In the meantime, groups of workers, like the Glace Bay miners in Nova Scotia and farmers in Alberta would help each other to insure themselves. There

The purpose of Maioni article is to analyze how Canada and United states ended up having two different form of health care insurance. Both countries until the 1940’s shared the same histories with their political ideology and economic development. This article examines how two counties with similar ideology came to have two different welfare states and most important government funded health insurance. Maioni points out two important reason why there was a diversion between both countries in terms of their health care. The first one is parliamentary government and the second was federalism.

Thus the modern population across Canada need private health care policy as it is more effective as compared to the general or the public one. In Canada, privatization of the healthcare sector started back in the times of Mike Harris. This is the season in which he embarked

Healthcare and access to medical aid vary from country to country, and because of this inconsistency, there has been an ongoing debate on which country has it right. While America is Canada’s closest neighbour, our countries have prominent differences when comparing our Healthcare Systems. Although the United States health care has vastly improved since 2010, the system still acts with major flaws leaving over 30 million residents without health coverage today. Throughout this essay, I will be comparing at the drastic differences of Healthcare Systems in Canada and the United States. The most prevalent differences between the two healthcare systems would be that Canada has a universal healthcare plan for citizens and the U.S has private and public plan.

Canada’s Medicare faults come from geographical inconveniences As an American, Canadian Medicare seems to be the supreme health-system. Tommy Douglas’s3 universal health-care is not as ‘supreme’ as it seems, in fact it can be related to the cliché of the grass is always greener. At a quick glance Medicare seems like it would be imperfect but it doesn’t require a lot of research to find its imperfections. The Canadian health care system is 70 percent federally funded compared to the US’s 47 percent1.

With taxes from healthcare slowly creeping into one’s income, a person under government healthcare is essentially paying the same, if not more, than a person under independent healthcare (Peikoff). Whether it is the scary policies in the PPACA or the destruction of market drive through government handouts, government healthcare is not the best route for the US. A free-market system provides much more advantages than a government system. A free-market system also puts more freedom in the hands of a consumer.

A country's healthcare system is essential to its population, preventing diseases and improving the overall health of its people. Many countries have different forms of healthcare that are available to their citizens. Depending on the country, the form of healthcare can be unobtainable or ineffective. While some countries are able to provide high-quality, accessible healthcare, not everyone is given the same opportunity. When examining the healthcare systems of the United States and Canada, it is interesting to note how their healthcare systems have qualities that intersect and diverge from one another.

The one major difference between the Canadian health care system and the American health care system is that is that they have a privatized health care system. A documentary such as “Sicko directed by Michael Moore” demonstrates the crisis of American citizens without health care coverage. Canada’s universal health care system ensures those who cannot pay for health to not suffer, contrary to the Sicko

The real debate is how can we accomplish the goal of universal healthcare in the most affordable and sustainable way. The United States is evaluated as a wealthy country, yet there are more penurious countries who provide health maintenance, paid through higher taxes. “In the United Kingdom and other European countries, payroll taxes average 37% - much higher than the 15.3% payroll taxes paid by the average US worker” (Gregory). With this data, the only reform would be to end the private health insurance companies of dominant health services, and incorporate a single payer system. Conversely, it is factual that taxes will rise, but the implementation of universal healthcare will better the health of American citizens.

Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.

Due to the waiting times and issues of access in the Canadian healthcare system, people have been reported in saying that they are willing to pay out of pocket for a system that would be more efficient (Irvine). Sadly, with laws that inhibit and in some areas prohibit this market in Canada, people are not going to be able to find market based solutions to the problem on access to health care in Canada. Publically managed and government funded health care programs that include little to no fees for the general public are very attractive in theory (Irvine) but it seems, in Canada’s case, this can lead to issues of access and quality which would make people argue that systems that provide vouchers or subsidies for health care are more efficient and market

Another successful planted system of Sandtopia is its healthcare system which is mostly derived from the French, since they were the best in the world in 200. “France has a non-profit national health insurance system with mandatory coverage for anyone who resides for more than 3 months in the country,” ( Briere n.pag.). Unlike many other countries, health care in not directed by the government s but rather by autonomous representatives that include employers, unions, and a few government leaders. Citizens finance the care through contributions of a small percent of their earnings or on taxable income for a non-salaried person. Such an idea is feasible because all citizens would be capable of the expenses for the health insurance.

Socialized medicine is a form of medical insurance that is available to all lawful citizens that the government covers. Throughout the United States 21.3% of the population receive benefits from the government due to their financial situation. Consequently, such benefits are not available for all citizens and may be difficult to qualify for. Moreover, Government-run programs are often cheaper, more administratively efficient, and even of superior quality than privately-run programs at the national level. If the United States began offering socialized medicine, there would be a slight rise in taxes in order to cover the 82 million dollars in costs.

Canada enjoys the benefits of a “universal” insurance plan funded by the federal government. The idea of having a publicly administered, accessible hospital and medical services with comprehensive coverage, universality and portability has its own complex history, more so, than the many challenges in trying to accommodate the responsibility of a shared-cost agreement between federal and provincial governments. (Tiedemann, 2008) Canada’s health care system has gone through many reforms, always with the intent to deliver the most adequate health care to Canadians. The British North American Act, Hospital Insurance and Diagnostic Services Act, Saskatchewan’s Medical Care Act, and the Canada Health Act are four Acts that have played an important

Australia’s private health insurance market has developed from a fairly geographically segmented market, with individual shared funds working closely to regional or industrial hubs, or the position of medical facilities. In recent years, this regionalization has been weakened, to an extent, through progress in the availability mutual funds, increasing government involvement and communication in the private health insurance market, as well as the increasing movement of populations. At a national level, the market for private health insurance in Australia is considerably concentrated, regardless of the number of insurers, the variety in insurance type, and a large market of over 12.6 million policyholders with some form of private health insurance.