Joan Britney Case

Britney Spears and Joyce Brown are two women who suffered from mental illness, and both got their rights stripped away from them due to their mental illness. This raises the concern on rights for the mentally ill, and when that line can/ should be crossed. In the case concerning Britney Spears it is important to note that she did have a close relationship with her mother, but never with her father. Spears father was an alcoholic.

In this case, regarding the legal validity of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforcing an order on Betty’s land, they are within full scope of authority. The EPA issued its order in reference to the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The pond located on Betty Blackacre’s property was deemed as a major migratory location for many birds, including endangered species. Section 9 of the ESA bars the taking of a species. In this instance, the term “take” encompasses any harm of an endangered species or its habitat (Laschever, 2012).

Danielle van Dam was a seven year old girl who lived in a San Diego town named Sabre Springs. The parents lives were changed forever when one morning when they go into Danielle’s room and find that she isn’t there. As a kid, I went to an elementary school in Dehesa which is the same place Danielle's body was found. I remember my mother and I stopped at a memorial of hers at the location her body was found. It was under a tree on the side of the road in which people brought flowers, balloon, cards and pictures of her.

Janice Green was a wife, mother, and community organizer in Perry County, Alabama. Right now she is an inmate sentenced to 37 years in Prison. This narrative is an attempt to explain the story as it was collected from a variety of sources, such as witness interviews, family interviews, released statements, legal sources and good old fashioned research. As I understand it, here is how they hemmed up Janice Green.

Notoriety a Modern Myth High profile court cases have been getting increasingly popular as time goes on. Court cases like the Casey Anthony and Scott Peterson trials are media dynamite. Although the media is legally allowed to be a part of these court proceedings, they still cause drama and stipulations that many feel would not be a factor if their presence were withdrawn. Notoriety, or being famous for bad deeds, is a characteristic engulfing many of Hollywood’s elite personnel; for this reason, many high profile cases have become even more of a media magnet. Many may believe that notoriety is a determining factor in high profile cases, but all legal proceedings are conducted in the same manner whether heavily documented in the

another ethics issue involving McCallister and Frank Bascombe was when they had Dick promoted and then have him take the fall for them on national television this was unethical because it made an employee who was otherwise a very competent man turn into a scapegoat for the misdeeds of the executive officers and tarnished his reputation within the job market. The next ethics issue involving McCallister and Frank Bascombe was the bribery of Frank by Jack to keep quiet about the falsification or the balance sheets in exchange for 10million dollars. There are two sides to this unethical issue the first being that fact that Jack is doing everything to cover all the possibilities of being caught. Then next part of was that fact that Frank took the bribe knowing that he was hurting all of those people and doing it for his own personal

Bailey Nelson’s statements are representative over the community of Granville gym users in the segment transcribed for performance. She directly tackles her own value for the ideal female figure as well as the general value to a larger population of students on campus, providing context to the question of its influence on fitness behavior within the female student population. There are moments of self revelation where she discovers answers about herself through questions she has never asked herself such as what influences her during a workout and in what ways. Bailey clarifies that on average the female figure is highly held among female residents at Granville, but it varies depending on the individual’s ideals. In the later part of the transcription for performance there is an interview segment that describes Bailey’s friends who have prioritized workouts over academics.

Also, the false allegation about a company hurts company public image (Lourdes,2016 ). The Greene’s Jewelry reputation will be ruined in the blink of an eye. People will say that a woman was unlawfully terminated from Greene’s Jewelry because she was pregnant. Therefore. Greene’s Jewelry must prove the false accusation to the public to gain its image.

The major ethical issues brought to attention in this case study is primarily

United States vs. Martha Stewart and Peter Bacanovic occurred in 2004, and it is often regarded to be one of this century’s most sensational court cases. The trial occurred in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum presided over the case. Robert G. Morvillo served as Ms. Stewart’s attorney, and Richard M. Strassberg served as the attorney of Mr. Bacanovic. The lead prosecution attorney was Karen Patton Seymour. Perhaps, though, it is best to begin by inspecting the facts of the case.

Summary Carol Alden was referred to an infant mental health program by a public health nurse. At that time, she was suffering from postpartum depression, agoraphobia, and possible domestic abuse. Ms. Alden was 4 months pregnant with her second child; her first child, Kyle, was 16 months old.

4. Comment on each of the ethical issues mentioned in this case. Rank them

In this Enron Scandal ,several moral issues and values are being discussed .The moral issues is the misconduct of code of ethics by management level of a corporation , violation of code of professional ,ethical dilemma that faced by a management level when involved own interest . The first moral issues that discussed in Enron Scandal is misconduct code of ethics by management level of a corporation .In this case ,the mastermind of this scandal is the company CEO , Mr .

Sexual harassment and sexual assault are very serious issues happening today in the workplace. Women or men have suffered from unsolicited sexual behaviors that are typically provoked by someone “higher” in position. “Sexual harassment especially has been a fixture in the workplace since women began to work outside their homes” (Fitzgerald, 1993). It is solely the responsibility of the employer to ensure that all employees within are aware and are very cautions of laws, misconduct, and liabilities. Employers must enforce the Policy Prohibiting Discrimination and further extend those laws and guidelines to their employees.

This three element fraud is often referred as a fraud triangle by the researchers (Cohen, Ding, Lesage & Stolowy, 2010, p. 276). On the other hand the theory of planned behavior focuses on the intentions behind the planned behavior. Ajzen (1991, p. 188) explains this as “attitude toward the behavior… refers to the degree to which a person has a favorable or unfavorable evaluation or appraisal of the behavior in question”. Cohen, Ding, Lesage & Stolowy (2010) have combined the fraud triangle and theory of planned behavior to understand that how the two theories can be collectively studied to find out the reasons behind the unethical activities that results in corporate frauds. Cohen, Ding, Lesage & Stolowy (2010) in their work studied various organizations including WorldCom and identified following: • WorldCom’s management had an excessive interest in maintaining the entity’s stock price and earning trends (p. 287).