The theoretical concept of Deconstruction was introduced in the late 1960’s by Jacque Derrida, who was inspired greatly by the works of Ferdinand de Saussure. Deconstruction emphasises a de-centred world, a world where the grasping of meaning is unattainable. Derrida, whose name is synonymous with Deconstruction, rejected the idea that we live in a world dominated by language (Leitch 1815). A de-centred world consists just of a series of intermingling and substitutable signs that exist in a vicious relationship with one another. Deconstruction supports that a concept must be apprehended in the context of its opposite, such as community/isolation. Essentially, it is understood that everything we consider to be ‘natural’ is purely ‘discourse’. …show more content…
Dee’s hatred of the old fashioned, tattered house is further confirmed by the narrator; “Why don’t you do a dance in the ashes? I’d wanted to ask her” (Walker, 316). To commodify something is to attach a price tag to it. Dee, although has little interest in the labour involved in creating the quilts, or concerned with the butterchurn as an ancient family heirloom, only becomes infatuated with the items because they are “priceless” entities (Walker, 320). Dee’s way of valuing the objects is contrasted to that of her mother and Maggie’s. She is horrified at the idea of her sister employing the quilts for “everyday use”; “Maggie would put them on the bed and in five years they’d be in rags” (Walker, 320). This shows Maggie and her mother’s immodesty in their humble house in stark contrast to Dee’s ferocious Materialism. Maggie further intensifies this contrast by stating she did not require the quilts in order for her memories of Grandma Dee to remain intact; “I can ‘member Grandma Dee without the quilts”(Walker, …show more content…
Clearly obsessed with this materialistic vision of her life, Mama recalls how "Dee wanted nice things"(Walker, 316), including ‘a yellow organdy dress” and “black pumps to match a green suit” (316). Her individual, flamboyant style is primarily motivated by Dee’s attempt to deny her underprivileged roots. Perhaps Dee’s materialism is her opportunity to defy the oppression she felt growing up in a disadvantaged society; “I couldn’t bare it any longer being named after the people who oppress me” (Walker, 318). The character of Dee in Everyday Use possesses one major priority; social status. She has been introduced to a new world while away at college, a world where everything is commodified and man can create nothing without nature or without the sensuous external world. It is the material on which his labour is expressed, in which it is active, from which and by means of which.it produces (Leitch, 766). It is apparent that Dee’s materialistic ways have been amplified by her deep rooted, oppressive childhood encounters. According to her mother, once Dee is faced with the new house, “she’ll want to tear it down”, which presents itself as a “three bed” cottage with a “tin roof” and no windows; “there are no real
Growing up together under the same conditions clearly created two very distinct individuals with contrasting views regarding their past, present, and future. When Dee arrives home from college, she portrayed herself as higher class; she put herself above her family and her past. During her visit, she was looking for valuable things to have in her home. While looking around, Dee notices two handmade quilts containing pieces of clothe that date back to the Civil War.
In this short story, we see Dee find her way once she steps away from her family. Through Dee's time away from home she is exposed to things she wouldn't have been if she didn't go off to school. She was given the opportunity that Mama and Maggie never had and Dee tries to explain how she has changed. Mama and Dee say, "Well," I say. "Dee."
When you look at it from Dee’s point of few she just seems to be pushing her family to expand their education and have a better life. Dee doesn’t want her family on a farm and raising cattle because that isn’t what she likes. She has an open mind about things and sees them as more than just what they are used for, hence the title, “Everyday Use.” Dee may seem like a rude, spoiled girl, but looking at it from her perspective, all she wants is for her family to live the way she does. Changing the point of view from Mama to Dee would make a major difference.
In the short story Everyday Use the character Dee shows the character traits of greed, over confidence, and uptight. One example, of Dee being greedy is how she wanted to take the quilts that her grandmother made. This example shows how Dee is greedy because Maggie deserved the quilts more because she acts like part of the family. An example, of Dee being uptight is when she takes pictures of her family and their house, but does not include herself in the picture. Furthermore this shows how Dee is uptight because she is too embarrassed to include herself in the picture.
"She 'd probably be backwards enough to put them to everyday use" (320). Dee thinks Maggie would be dumb to keep the quilts for “everyday use”. Also, she figured her family did not know their own heritage. Dee feels as though her sister should “make something of” herself. She states, “It’s really a new day for us” to show that Maggie needs to see a greater amount of the world.
(Walker 721) Dee can’t understand the true meaning and significance of her name, passed along through four generations; therefore she doesn’t understand the significance of the quilts. The quilts are a symbol of pride and struggle and these objects have a value that Dee will never
People always suggest others to be themselves. To not care about what others have to say about you. People try to ignore society 's opinion about them, not realizing the importance it plays in identity. For a person to feel identified, they must have similarities or differences, and some type of involvement. Identity involves a combination of how you see yourself and how others see you.
Then we are on the stage and Dee is embracing me with tears in her eyes.” Her dream shows how the mother dreams of a better relationship with her daughter than the one she has. Dee seems to be embarrassed by her mother and where she comes from. The author shows this when she talks about the burning of their house. She seemed happy to see her house burn down, “Why don’t you do a dance around the ashes?
Dee is by far the story’s most interesting exploration of a stereotype; there is irony in that despite what her appearance may indicate about her heritage, she does not live within her heritage in the same manner as her family does, she merely showcases it on a grander scale. Dee has returned with a new outward look on her African heritage, embracing the name of Wangero and rejecting the name that came from “the people who oppress” her (1534). Her new manner of dressing is also a representation of this newfound African identity, along with the appearance of her Muslim partner, Hakim-a-barber. While it is easy to argue that Dee, or Wangero, has only embraced her heritage to the extent of her outward appearance—for instance having no interest in actually using the butter churner, only displaying bits and pieces that give the illusion of some connection to her ancestors—she represents another form of heritage and identity. Exemplified best by Joe Sarnowski in his literary critique, “Dee/Wangero understands the value of what
Alice Walker wrote what Mama said about Dee or Wangero, “Dee wanted nice things.” Mama describes Dee as a lavish person who is only interested in herself and her fulfilling’s. Dee had changed her name to show that she is not accepting that a “white person” named her ancestors in way, so it can be passed down. Walker describes Mama as someone who is satisfied with what they have. “I will wait for her in the yard that Maggie and I made so clean and wavy yesterday afternoon,” Walker demonstrates how Mama is pleased with nature where her life takes place in.
Dee doesn’t truly know what her culture represents, but instead she tries to use everything from college to apply to everyday life. Dee never appreciated her roots as a child, and she still don’t. Mama and Maggie used the churnand dasher daily with care, and all Dee wants to do with the churn and dasher is “think of something artistic to do with it” ( Walker 273.) She sees the churn as a project she can work on; on the other hand Mama and Maggie see it as a churn with a lot of meaning behind it. Maggie and Mama cherish the handmade quilts that were made by Grandma Dee.
Alice Walker’s “Everyday Use” illustrates Dee’s struggle for identity by placing her quest for a new identity against her family’s desire for maintaining culture and heritage. In the beginning, the narrator, who is the mother of Dee, mentions some details about Dee; how she “...wanted nice things… She was determined to stare down any disaster in her efforts… At sixteen, she had a style of her own: and (she) knew what style was.” Providing evidence to the thesis, she was obviously trying exceptionally hard to find for herself a sense of identity. She wanted items her family couldn’t afford, so she worked hard to gain these, and she found a sense of identity from them, but it also pushed her farther away from her family.
A lack of sense of self and empathy, Dee’s characterization represents a search for
“Everyday Use” by Alice Walker Literary genius is a term thrown around often in this day and time. Many might say that the literary world has been diluted. However, if there is one who deserves that title, it is Alice Walker. It is especially so for her piece, ‘Everyday Use’. The short story was first published in 1973 as part of the author’s short story compilation.
This womanist conceptualization is shown by a nuanced destruction by Dee’s response to the quilt, which is the main metaphor in the story. A typical political rhetoric is represented in the character of Dee. This is a rhetoric which is more aggressive than mature, showier than subtle. Dee ends up in simplifying and commodifying culture, instead of relating it to any meaningful way. She comes out as a being who takes activism as a fad rather than a commitment.