Jan-Erik Aavik IB English HL B. Raid 04.11.2016 Written Task 2 Outline: Part of the course to which the task refers: Part 3 Literature - text and context Title of the text for analysis: Hamlet, William Shakespeare 1599 Title of the Written Task 2: How does the text conform to, or deviate from, the conventions of a particular genre, and for what purpose? In this essay I will: Explore the conventions of a tragedy Show how Shakespeare adheres to the rules of a tragedy Determine sub-genres present in the play Demonstrate how Hamlet’s themes and characters conform to revenge tragedy In a nutshell, a tragedy is a form of drama established on human suffering, generally concerns the downfall of the protagonist and ending on a despondent tone. “Hamlet” is more specifically classified as a “Shakespearean tragedy”; in which key differences consist of the chorus being replaced by comedic scenes, the play having several subplots and the protagonist facing a tragic death. Additionally “Hamlet” can be categorized as a revenge tragedy, as partly the plot is about a quest for vengeance. In Act I we discover that “something is rotten in the state of Denmark”. Further on that King Claudius secretly murdered the old King Hamlet - being now stuck in purgatory, the ghost of King Hamlet orders young Hamlet to revenge for the murder by killing Claudius. The hero is then motivated to revenge, thus revenge remains one of the essential themes of the tragedy. Rhetorically ghosts
A person’s true colors are seen when they come across times of great challenges and conflict, “The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.” ~Martin Luther King. This quote best fits the plots of Shakespeare’s Hamlet and William Golding’s Lord of the Flies. In Hamlet, Prince Hamlet struggles to keep himself sane while acting insane to avenge his father murder. In the Lord of the Flies, Ralph and Piggy try to keep peace and order on the island while jack resorts to complete savagery.
Even the way Hamlet treats all the characters throughout the play has to do with revenge and what he needs to do to get revenge. Hamlet's thoughts of revenge are first provoked by his father's ghost, who reveals himself to have been killed by his brother Claudius. This revelation moves Hamlet to vengeance. In his monologue, Hamlet Uses the literary stylistic device of excavation to express his first impulse for revenge. For example, in Act1, Scene V, he yells, "Oh, villains, villains, laughing, damn villains!" , one can smile, smile, and become a villain.
The ghost told Hamlet about how he was murdered by Claudius. The ghost told hamlet how he was going to get revenge. He wanted to torment Claudius and then kill him. Even after the king died he is still greedy trying to get revenge. This shows even though the king is dead or someone is dead they will still try and get revenge because they are greedy and don't want to give up their belongings or title.
The reader completes their examination of the Hamlet tragedy, and we agree that Hamlet is a significant text, as it encourages us to think again about our values and
Ira Dane Pancho Professor Gmelin English 1B 25 April 2016 Hamlet Review Some wish that the language in Shakespeare’s Hamlet and his other works should be updated that way it’s easier to read in print, and for it to also include effects to perhaps make it more appealing to a twenty-first-century audience. While others thinks that nothing can outshine the brilliance of Shakespeare; which ever group you belong, the Franco Zeffirelli’s film version of the play Hamlet might give you the best of both worlds. However, Zeffirelli’s makes changes in some narrative techniques, changes the plot, and changes Hamlet’s actions. The movie felt slow and the chosen actors was both good and bad. Above all, both works of Shakespeares and Franco Zeffirelli still share the same basic story and the same characters.
Throughout the play Hamlet, William Shakespeare uses rhetorical devices and hidden meanings to convey his work. While at the same time, he stays in iambic pentameter throughout the script. This is tremendously a tedious task he encountered, which would stump most writers. In Act IV, scene III, Shakespeare incorporates sarcasm and hyperboles when Hamlet is being questioned by King Claudius, and an epanalepsis when Hamlet is expressing where Polonius’ body lies Act IV, Scene III, involves King Claudius and Hamlet discussing where Hamlet placed Polonius’ dead body at. It ends with Hamlet being told he will be shipped to England to live for a time.
King Hamlet’s ghost in Hamlet plays a very significant role in Shakespeare’s play even though he only appears briefly in the very beginning and two other times throughout the play. King Hamlet’s ghost furthers the play in many ways. He affects action by setting the play in motion, he affects the theme of revenge, and he helps develop other characters, specifically his son, Hamlet. He sets the play in motion by causing the wheels to spin inside of Prince Hamlet’s head, the ghost is the whole reason for Hamlet trying to extract revenge upon his murderous Uncle Claudius who is now the King of Denmark. The ghost affects the theme of revenge by causing Young Hamlet to be seized by vengeance, the whole play turns into a story of Prince Hamlet trying to avenge his father’s wrongful death.
“Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.” (1.5.100) As it is hinted in the first scenes and then explicitly stated by Marcellus, the country is undergoing a change that is not purely natural. The fifth scene in act one, lines 29-54 of Shakespeare's Hamlet (1603), supports this idea by focusing on the corruption that has taken over Denmark due to Claudius' actions. The new king, though not present is that passage, is essentially the main topic of Hamlet and the Ghost’s conversation. One of much importance, since it allows the apparition to fuel Hamlet’s desire for revenge by portraying Claudius as evil.
The story of a young man by the name of Hamlet has been told since it was first written in the early 1600s. The timeless classic tells the tale of Prince Hamlet, who discovers that his mother had wed his uncle, two months prior to his father’s passing. He visits the throne in Denmark because he is disgusted at the act of incest, where the ghost of his deceased father confronts him, insisting that he was murdered by Claudius, the new king. Hamlet is enraged, and he becomes obsessed with the idea of proving the crime so that he can obtain revenge against Claudius (Crowther). Despite the myriad of themes that circulate throughout the Shakespearean play, many do not realize one hidden yet extensive theme: actions and their consequences.
Here I am going to express my views on the theme of revenge in the play ‘Hamlet’. The play was written between 1599 and 1602 during Elizabethan era. During the Elizabethan era, the revenge plays were well acclaimed. The dramatist picturised the theme of revenge in the play ‘Hamlet’ beautifully. Revenge causes the characters in play ‘Hamlet’ to act blindly through anger and emotion, rather than through reason.
“Something is rotten in the state of Denmark” (I.v.90). Hamlet is about a young prince who is mourning the loss of his father. He then tries to seek revenge on his uncle Claudius because he poisoned his father. Throughout the play Hamlet’s behavior starts to change which causes him to become mad. The theory about all this is a Psychological Approach.
Summary: In Act I, Scene I, Bernardo, Marcellus and Horatio encounter a ghost and believe it looks like the deceased King Hamlet. They resolve to tell Hamlet’s son -- also named Hamlet -- what they saw. In the next scene, the new king, Claudius, gives a speech about how sorrowful he is over the death of his brother -- King Hamlet -- and his joyous he feels over his new marriage to Gertrude -- King Hamlet’s widow and young Hamlet’s mother. After sending to messengers to tell the king of Norway that the heir to the throne, Fortinbras, is plotting to steal land back from the Danish, Claudius allows a nobleman, Laertes, to take leave to France, but tells Hamlet he must stay with his new family instead of going back to Wittenberg for school.
Shakespeare’s Hamlet takes the audience on a journey of a prince who is caught between two spheres of a society in which he attempts to discard the expected norms of a prince to converge to his new ideas on the type of man he wants to live as. The Renaissance was a period in the 16th century that challenged ideals that were limited and outdated. Hamlet is a humanist figure who lives according to the humanist ideals and this leads him to questioning the society and his role as a prince in the 16th century. During the play we see how Hamlet is in constant conflict with the morality of exacting revenge and his new learning and education. It is against this backdrop that I will discuss the argument of Arnold Kettle’s “From Hamlet to Lear” in relation the extracts I have analysed.
Bhimani 1 Outline Prescribed Question: How does the text conform to, or deviate from, the conventions of a particular genre, and for what purpose? Text: The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne Thesis: In The Scarlet Letter, Nathaniel Hawthorne effectively conforms to the conventions of the gothic genre for the purpose of characterizing the Puritan society as oppressive, portraying the hypocrisy found within Puritan society and highlighting the consequences for not confessing sin.
Williams Shakespeare is recognized as the greatest English writer. One of his best works ever written is “Hamlet”, which is the most complex, confusing, and frequently performed play. The extreme complexity of the main character – prince Hamlet in this play contributes to its popularity until today. “Hamlet is supposedly the most quoted figure in Western culture after Jesus, maybe the most charismatic too” (Bloom 384). In the most famous revenge tragedy, his biggest weakness that he procrastinates completing his revenge for his father’s death by killing the murderer.