Background: Low back pain (LBP) is common among office workers and is the most common cause of workrelated disability in people under 45 years of age. The aetiology of LBP is widely accepted to be multi-factorial. Prognostic research into office workers at risk of developing LBP has received limited attention. The aims of this study were to develop a risk score to identify office workers likely to have LBP and to evaluate its predictive power. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the non specific back pain in the office worker of the university of the Hail. Sitting: University of Hail, female campus Methodology: Cross-sectional descriptive study using self-administered questionnaire. Quetelet Index (wt/ht2) was used to …show more content…
LBP is common among office workers with the one-year prevalence ranging from 23% to 38% [3-5]. LBP is the most common cause of workrelated disability in people under 45 years of age and the most expensive cause of work-related disability, in terms of workers’ compensation and medical expenses [6]. The etiology of LBP is not fully understood but is assumed to be of multi-factorial origin, indicating that individual, physical and psychosocial factors can contribute to their development and persistence [8]. Previous studies have identified several individual factors associated with LBP including female [4], level of education [9], smoking [10], sleep deprivation [11], prolonged driving [12]. Regarding work-related risk factors, accumulated computer usage has been linked to increased risk of LBP [13]. Sitting for more than half a work day in combination with awkward postures or frequently working in a forward bent position has been found to increase the likelihood of having LBP [14,15]. …show more content…
Here the chief complaint is back pain, whether the sample have pain or not. Under weight with back pain the BMI is 1(1%),for the normal with neck pain the BMI is 11(11%).underweight without back pain the BMI is 1(2%),for normal without neck pain the BMI is 8(20%)and for obese13(20%).the correlation between BMI and back pain is done by Chi square test(χ2) χ2=12.068,the standard deviation (df)df=3 and the significance (p)p= 0.007. So this study is shows that when BMI increases the neck pain is increased. Correlation between BMI and Low back pain: Pain area BMI LBA No pain Total Under wth 1 1 2 Normal 11 8 19 Over wth 15 1 16 Obese 13 0 13 Total 40 10 50 χ2=12.068 df=3 p=0.007 In the table 3 there is correlation between past illnesses(arthritis and past abdominal surgery)and pain level,and the result is χ2=0.75 p>0.05(NS)for arthritis, and for past abdominal surgery is χ2=0.743 p>0.05(NS)p=0.69.So p is not significant. Table 3: Correlation between past illnesses and pain level: Pain level Arthritis Past abdominal surgery Yes No Yes No Max 1 6 3 4 Mod 4 15 7 12 Mild 1 10 3 9 Total 6 31 3 9 χ2=0.75 p>0.05(NS) χ2=0.743 p>0.05(NS)
Pain radiates from the lower back and aggravated by bending, getting in and out of the car, lifting, reciprocating stairs, sitting, standing, turning, twisting and walking which is mildly alleviated by over-the-counter drugs and
Family History also is positive for rheumatoid arthritis (Inflammatory changes in the joints causing pain), so we had serology (scientific study of blood or other bodily fluids) run for the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (the rate at which red blood cells settle in one hour used to detect inflammation associated with conditions such as infections, cancers, and autoimmune diseases), and looking for presence of Anti-Nuclear-Antibodies (found in patients whose immune system may be predisposed to cause inflammation against their own body
The groups were not significantly different as the t-values from both groups were 0.0526 and 0.055. Also, the p values of the lumbar and femur neck were .958 and .956
Page’s patient, P, suffers from back pain and he is determined to find the cause of the pain. To rule of the most lethal causes of back pain, some of the questions Page asks include “Did the pain wake him up at night? Was it worse when he was lying down? Had he recently lost weight?” (Page).
Excel output of test statistic The output for the Chi-Square for independence test is provided in the Statistic assignment seven outline and obtained from an SSPS output. Please refer to Statistics assignment seven to see the SPSS output for the Chi-Square tables. Step 5: Degrees of freedom The degrees of freedom (df) for a Chi-Square for independence is calculated as the number of rows subtracted by one multiplied by the number of columns subtracted by one (Salkind, 2013).
Interestingly, social function was the most frequently selected domain with pain intensity, although participants did not consider social health as an important area as physical health, which was obviously supported by the results of the open-ended question and PROMIS cards parts of the interview. Social function was merged from two PROMIS domains; “ability to participate in social roles and activities” and “satisfaction with social roles and activities”. These two domains were combined because the participants had difficulty differentiating between them and therefore they only selected one of them during the interview. A systematic review showed that the social component of life was important for individuals with LBP 55. In addition, WHO reported that LBP affects the work performance among individuals with LBP and it considered a leading cause of work absence and loss 53.
One of the causes were unsafe work habits like it shows in Document
After reviewing the agency’s quarterly Workers Compensation reports from the past two years, an alarming pattern regarding carpal tunnel claims among employees was discovered. In the past two years the amount of employees with carpal tunnel claims has more than tripled. The majority of the work being done within this agency takes place in front of a computer. With the constant typing and repetitive computer work, our employees are at a higher risk for carpal tunnel.
The article suggests to take a 5-15 minute break to allow your body to rest. Some of the research also stated that these work related injuries were caused by being understaff and having no help. It is very important to have someone spot you or assist you when you are turning a
Insurance coverage plays a large roll in physical therapy when working with an individual who needs treatment post injury, as does the state in which the therapy is provided. Depending on an individual’s insurance coverage there are different requirements and steps that need to be taken in order for them to enter into physical therapy care post injury, and workers’ compensation is no different. In the state of Connecticut, one requirement that is that a referral for physical therapy services must be obtained from a physician (Gardner, 2013). Although a referral is required, preapproval by workers’ compensation is not required for an individual to enter into physical therapy care (State of Connecticut Workers’ Compensation Commission, 2010).
You are on your feet a lot and walking around, especially when you’re working long hours. The
They have damage all through their back, hips, shoulders, and ligaments from standing 6-8 hours every day without rest. The constant pressure of their own body weight is angled to the same joints all day and causes many side effects. Some of those side effects are: arthritis, sciatic nerve damage, back pain, swollen feet, discomfort in ankles and feet, stress fractures, and much more. There is no law saying that employers are required to provide a place for them to sit when they are feeling fatigued. This means that employees have to stand through whatever discomfort they experience no matter how serious or traumatic.
The risk factors of LBP is not fully understood but is assumed to be of multi-factorial origin, indicating that individual, physical and psychosocial factors can contribute to their occurrence and persistence of LBP on nursing populations (6, 14). Reasons for this include both extrinsic and intrinsic risk factors that are relevant to nursing profession. Extrinsic factors include environmental and physical factors, where as intrinsic factors provide for personal and ergonomic risk factors (10). Different epidemiological studies have been done to identify and relate possible risk factors to the occurrence of LBP among nursing staffs. They found that individual factors such as age, gender, educational level, body mass index, and psychosocial
Percentage of Responses 7% 15% 18% 25% 35% 2.34 Statements 11 and 12 investigated effect of makeup on self perception Statement S A UD D SD Mean 11. If I was wearing more makeup than normal I would feel uncomfortable. 5 4 3 2 1 4.00 Percentage of responses 53% 18% 17% 7% 5% 12.
* * Sig. (1-tailed) .000 *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).