Just about everything happens in the court room however, it does seem confusing to someone who hasn’t experienced the justice system first hand. In order to conduct hearings efficiently, there is a pre-set order and all proceedings are carried out according to a certain procedure (n.d). All details are pre-deferred such as who stands there, who stands where, who takes the floor when and who are allowed to be in the court room or not allowed (n.d). The room is situated in a way which is abide by these rules for proper organization in the court room. It includes separate circulation patterns for the public, prisoner and jury member, special attention to acoustic and lighting levels. Often the court will usually explain why the rule is being created …show more content…
The judge in the court room is to overlook proceedings from the bench and have certain tasks to ensure the trial process and ensure justice. The judge has to determine whether any evidence that the parties want to use is either improper or illegal. Before the deliberations begin, the judge gives instructions to the jury about standards deciding in the case. Finally, the judge will impose a sentence of the convicted defendant if found guilty (2015, July 24). The lawyer’s role is to contribute to speak to the judge, the witness and the jury. Each task of the lawyer is to intervene the facts that has been put on their client’s case by using legal procedures. The duty for the lawyer is to represent the accused of committing crime and question the witness by cross examining the state. The lawyer is seated facing the judge and is in front of the spectators who are seated behind (2015, July 24). The jury’s part is to decide the facts in the case to apply the law in order to reach a verdict. The jurors are group of people to decide the law in the case. Jurors are expected to be unbiased and free of pre-accept approach about guilt or innocence. The group are seated in a boxed-area on one side of the court room (2015, July 24). The court reporter sits near the witness stand in the court room and records everything that is said during the trial on a type writing machine. This information become that official record of the trial. The witness gives the testimony about the facts in the case. During the testimony, they sit or stand on the witness stand facing the court room. The witness gets asked questions about the case by one or the other party which they are asked to
The clear distinction between a jury and a judge is among the key specifications of the seventh amendment. This distinction in the law is termed as functions. According to the amendment, the judge is designated to try the law whereas the jury can try according to facts. This distinguishing between the law and fact is important as it gives the legitimacy to the decree of juries. At the same time, the amendment prevents from violation of the justified legal anticipations of the
Role of the Courts Firstly, the coroner’s court investigated the deaths of the accused’s family. The case was then heard in the local court. Due to the fact that the case was an indictable offence, the local court could not finalise the verdict. Therefore, the local court conducted a committal hearing, where the magistrate was to determine whether the prosecution evidence is capable of satisfying a jury, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the accused committed the offence.
After listening to both sides present their case the judge will issue a ruling on the defendant’s
The witness impacts the jury decision on many cases because the way they are. In the Trayvon Martin case Rachel Jeantel, the witness seemed like an illiterate hood person. The witness was on the stand for a couple hours. The defense would question her and agitate her to prove the jury that Mr. Martin was a hoodlum.
Jurors should not know anything about a specific case and not follow public affairs and read the news (Doc F). When a person is selected to be part of a jury, they have to say an oath stating that they will not use their emotions to determine the verdict of a trial. If a juror is caught using their emotions, they will be fined for a crime called perjury. Since there are twelve people in a jury, there is a variation of opinions when the jury decides a verdict. But, a judge is more professional and knows how to only use the evidence provided and be less biased.
In chapter 4, Consulting and Testifying it explain how psychologists are needed in the courtroom in order to consult or testify with lawyers to the judicial process. The series of American Story Crime episode 5: “The Race Card”, there were examples and concepts of the structure and process in criminal and civil court with the legal system. While reading chapter 4, I learned that there are four stages of the judicial process which are pretrial, trail, disposition and appeals. Before heading to the court, preparation was done to assists the attorney during the trial by preparing the witnesses and making decisions about particular trail stages. During the opening statement, it included a judge and the jury in the room to hear from both lawyers
List the courtroom actors and their function in the courtroom. The principle actors in the courtroom are the lawyers, law enforcement, a U.S. attorney, a court support staff, and other courtroom participants. The judge presides over the courtroom and is responsible for maintaining order, providing the jury with guidance in the interpretation of laws, issues warrants, sets bail, rules on pre-trial motions and is determines sentences within guidelines.
There are many things that happen in court, whether somebody is prosecuting or being prosecuted, defending or being defended; there are legal ways and practices for all of it. Lawyers defend somebody, prosecutors prosecute somebody, or somebody defends themselves. There are many different methods, all of them legal, with which somebody is presented in court. These jobs, depending on how good of a lawyer the person is, can determine somebody 's fate in court and for the rest of their
The judge is the one decide if a plea bargain is accepted or denied the also decides if an offender can be released from jail before their
Foreman (Juror 1): He is an assistant football coach at a High School. Elected as the foreman of the jury, he has the responsibility to keep the jury process organized. Although he is not particularly bright, he is dogged. Initially, he struggled to keep up with his authority. Eventually, he managed to weight to his authority as the foreman as well as his opinions.
The defense attorney is who represents the person charge with the crime. The prosecution and defense work with the trial judge to select the jury which would hear the case in a fair and impartial manner. Jury decides if the defendant is found guilty or innocence.
When hearing a witness there are many factors that need to be taken into consideration. It need to be considered if the witness has a motive, how well they can recall the events, if a certain outcome might benefit them and also their credibility. Although eye witness testimony has been challenged as biased or insufficient (Wells& Loftus, 1984) a certain type of witness can contribute to a criminal case because of their knowledge. Expert witnesses are individuals that have experience, skills, knowledge and expertise in subjects beyond that of an ordinary person. Their opinion is accepted as an evidence.
In a trial a defendant is represented typically by a barrister or solicitor that can appear in a court and many defendants that do not have enough money to afford a lawyer normally represent themselves. During the trial if the defendant pleads not guilty the jury is sworn on the case and the prosecution will make an opening speech introducing the case to the jury’s present in the court. The prosecution will make a speech about the evidence they gathered that is linked with the defendant. The defence team have the right to question the evidence the prosecution team have against the defendant. The defence witnesses give evidence and this evidence is crossed checked by the Prosecution team.
Hi, Mckay Studios, I’m attempting to find a studio who will allow me to film my own rendition of “The Judges House.” A story written by the same author that wrote Dracula. Though the monster in this story is not nearly as horrific or obvious as the infamous Dracula, this book could make just as terrifying a movie. I’ll start by describing the poster I’ve designed, you’ll notice it is pretty simple, however the meaning behind it should be more than enough. There is the alarm bell with the rat climbing down it, the rest of it is black except for the words of course.
Eyes now turn to the jury as an individual begins to stand; silence has now taken over, as the all ears are aimed at jury. They begin