Myths about ICD-10
So, the ICD-10 deadline whisked past us last week, and even still there are many practices that have not been able to understand the ICD-10 concept fully. Many physicians have been hearing things about ICD-10, most of which are not actually true. As a result, the ICD-10 implementation has been perceived much more complex than it actually is.
Following are some of the myths that have been busted by experts.
1. ICD-9 is outdated and needs replacement.
Though the ICD-9 has become outdated, it does not essentially mean that it needs replacement. The structure of ICD-9 consisted of 5 numeric placeholders, which means, there could be over 100,000 possible codes. The expansion of ICD-9 could have been done by increasing the number
…show more content…
There are around 40,000 injury and poisoning codes in ICD-10 compared to a meager 2,600 in ICD-9. Even external cause of injury increased from 1,300 in ICD-9 to 6,800 in ICD-10.
3. ICD-10 will improve patient care.
Let us clear this up a bit. ICD-10 helps gather and sort vast amounts of patient data. No way does it increase the quality of care provided. That will be done by advances in medical science. The ICD-10 codes will be entered once there is a diagnosis and the treatment will be the same. ICD-10 is not going to change how our healthcare system functions, it is just going to simplify data handling and facilitate better payments, which will be a win-win situation for everyone involved.
4. Payers will not be ready for the ICD-10 transition.
On June 2, CMS announced the second end-to-end testing week. There were over 800 companies participating which collectively sent over 23,000 test claims, while testing the new code set. Over 88% of the submitted codes were accepted in this test. A similar test was also held in January with an acceptance rate of 81%. Given such high acceptance rates from payers during the test phase, it is apparent that the payers are all geared up for
…show more content…
ICD-10 was developed without physician input.
This one does actually sound like a myth. If you were to design a coding system for the healthcare industry, whose primary objective is to classify and report diseases in a healthcare setting, doing this without physician input would be tiring as it would be
NCCI code pairs must match on member, provider, and date of service. CMS maintains tables of code pair edits and updates these tables on a quarterly
How ICD-10 impacts the revenue cycle management by Sashi Padarthy discusses the “opportunity” for facilities to improve on “clinical documentation, revenue cycle performance, and analytic capabilities for business intelligence” (Padarthy, July 2012, p. 7). Padarthy suggests the shift from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10 will require multi-departmental assessments to determine core factors within ICD-10 will that will directly influence coding, billing and reimbursement. Padarthy proposes facilities analyze their current diagnostic and procedural codes to assess whether their current codes accurately represent services provided. In addition, he asks facilities to determine “if an opportunity to leverage ICD-10” exists, and if so, what is needed; updated eligibility requirements, increased medical necessity
Accredit has over 1600 patients and they are providing 5 for us to pilot and we are not getting it right. Please know I do not point fingers and I don’t know why this continues to happen with kits that I receive, but I need this corrected. I cannot keep clients if your system/product
HCPCS codes facilitate the procedure of processing health insurance claims made by insurers such as Medicaid. The HCPCS is divided into two levels or classes. The task of classification lies with the Centres of Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) in association with the HCPCS work group and other third party payers. Classification is done quarterly, marking a significant step-up from its previous system of annual updates. Since 2014, the CMS has been implementing several changes regarding the continuation of HCSPCS level II.
Implementation will need to increase by medical staff to decrease disadvantages
We all know that on October 1, 2015 ICD-9 will no longer be precise information in the coding world. It will soon be ICD-10. Which is considered a major long overdue upgrade. It will advance healthcare in many many ways.
With the number of codes increasing from 14,000 to 70,000, the demand for coders and billing personnel has increased and exceeds local demand. Many healthcare organizations recently have contracted with coding vendors to provide ICD-9 coding assistance, in part to allow in-house coders to undergo ICD-10 training and participate in dual coding. However, It is still unclear how coding professionals and vendors will be impacted long-term by the implementation. According to Forbes, the ICD-10 switch for providers has been better than expected.
Early symptoms may not even be apparent to the primary care physicians unless they are directly assessed. This is a growing concern in terms of the escalating potential of
To lay the groundwork for portability, this rule set standardized codes and formats for the interchange of medical data and for administrative purposes. HIPAA mandates two types of codes for the transfer of data. First and most importantly, uniform codes are needed to describe diseases and injuries, describe the causes of the diseases and injuries, and to describe the preventions and treatments used. Secondly, there are smaller sets of codes for many administrative purposes—for describing ethnicity, the type of facility or the type of unit where care was performed. As much as possible, the major codes have been chosen based on code sets that are already in use, known as "legacy
This is important to physicians since reimbursements are how they make their money to keep their practices up and running. The effects of ICD-10 will be positive for all health care organizations once it’s in place. With something new many health care organizations are not looking forward to the change and time it will take to get everything in place. They fear they won’t have the manpower or time to get it up and running. I believe after knowing the effects of having ICD-10 and what it can do once it’s in place it will be worth it at the
At the time of the event, a bar coding system for all medication had been in effect for a duration of two weeks, however, Thao had been gone one of those crucial weeks. Because of her absence, she did not receive the adequate training, instead, she received a sped
This information is used to appropriately implement prevention and treatment for patients. The second outcome integrates analysis of information gathered by healthcare personnel to identify trends and inconsistencies within the healthcare population. Through this the origin of problems can be ascertained, and preventive measures can be instituted. Subsequently prevention will decrease incidences and ultimately the cost to
A well-organized system will save time when a doctor is in talking with a patient because all the pertinent information will be easy and quick to find. No patient wants to sit there and wait for the doctor to find the information or ask, "why are you here again?" Being able to easily navigate the system and have things well-organized will be in the best interests of the facility, to better care for their patients. Resources: The American Health Information Management Association.
As it is, practices are struggling to meet the October 1 ICD-10 compliance deadline. Assigning ICD-10 codes before then will cost real money. For example, if you want to design a billing system, it would have to include both ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes simultaneously. This could prove expensive depending on the healthcare vendor contracts.
As a former student in M201/ M202, I have to admit that I was a bit intimidated at the size of the ICD-10 CM/PCS coding books. However, as we began learning about the guidelines and rules to coding it all started to come together. Last year’s transition to ICD-10 for the United States, had required changes for all health care systems.