How Does Arthur Miller Use Dramatic Irony In The Crucible

In “The Crucible”, Arthur Miller displays one of the flaws of mankind by bringing us back to a period of time where confusion and panic spread. The Salem Witch Trials were a dark period of time, filled with false accusations and unjustified executions that ultimately showed how humans are able to be manipulated and used by others to achieve personal goals. A similar period of time to that of “The Crucible” was during the 1950s, when Senator Joseph McCarthy accused many individuals of being associated with communists including Miller himself. Miller’s usage of irony in “The Crucible” brings to light all of the imperfections that occur in these situations and shows the extent of how brainwashed a society can become. Irony was a prevalent rhetorical

Arthur Miller’s actions during the Red Scare mirrors the actions of John Proctor during the witch hunts in Arthur Miller’s play, “The Crucible”. In the last act of the play John Proctor was being forced to write down a confession of witchcraft when the court presses him to say more names, but refused. “Then it is proven, why must I say more?” (act 4). This is him refusing to continue the chaos of the witch hunt, instead of adding fuel to the fire he wanted to end it there with him no longer stating any names.

Arthur Miller's play The Crucible demonstrates the craziness that occurred in Salem in 1692. Althoughthe play is fiction, Miller based the plot of his play on verifiable occasions and his characters demonstrate how suspicion and dread can raise. Various characters utilized this dread to profit and they showedselfishness and wrongdoing. The two most wretched characters in the play were Rev. Parris and JudgeDanforth. From the earliest starting point of the play, Rev. Parris showed self-centeredness.

Oh the irony.... Arthur Miller portrays the irony of the puritan society through Elizabeth Proctor. Through the way she carries herself, by what others say and how she reacts in certain situations. Arthur Miller reveals irony throughout the story by the judging of others. Miller shows this through the character Goody Proctor when she states, “I can not judge you.

Out of the many varying types of irony presented in Arthur Miller’s, The Crucible, situational is by far the most evident. Miller included this to show the idea that the entirety of the Salem witch trials was ironic. The Puritans followed the concept of a theocracyin an attempt to bring the community closer together and ultimately rid themselves of the danger of wicthraft. However, this was most certainly not the case in Salem. Sotuational irony playes a part in this towards the end of the play when the survuors are starting to realize all of the bad things that have come from their actions over the past year, “there are orphans wandering from house to house; abandoned cattle bellow on the highroads, the stink of rotting crops hangs everywhere,

G.Williamson 27 January 2023 CCR English III Block 2 ¨The crucible¨ is a story that revolves around the salem witch trials. Many different themes could come from this story. One main theme I thought of was irony. Irony is known as a state of affairs or an event that seems deliberately contrary to what one expects and is often amusing as a result.

The ironies in “The Crucible” When many people think of “The Crucible” they think of the irony in the play. There are many different examples in the play, including the minister, the Puritan religion, and the killing of Salem’s finest people. The minister in the town of Salem, Reverend Parris, is a very egotistical and paranoid person. Parris is always concerned about himself and his reputation around the town.

In the Miller Transcript, Arthur Miller is convicted for his suspected association with communist organizations during the 1950s anti communist hunt led by Joseph McCarthy. Arthur Miller’s conviction was not based on any evidence linking him to communism other than attending a meeting with a group of suspected communist Hollywood writers whom Arthur Miller refused to identify. His trial is a great example of the unjust trials and convictions of innocent people under the suspicions of being communists during the McCarthy period.

One last technique is the foreshadowing. It came in various forms among them Kate 's nightmare which puts Larry 's death right before the reader 's eyes, although Kate herself does not believe it (xix). The whole play is wrapped in a language that helps in framing all these techniques and displaying the shared feeling of anger. Miller 's dialogue is a modern realistic one that is far away from being colloquial though it is simple and realistic. It is a modestly rich language that is at the same time deeply rooted in the daily speech.

In the play, Arthur Miller’s “The Crucible” many themes are shown. Throughout the themes the hunger for power, authority and respect stands out the most in male characters, which are the majority gender in the story. According to Webster’s dictionary, power is “the ability or right to control people or things.” Also, according to Webster’s dictionary authority is “the power to give orders or make decisions.” And lastly, Webster’s dictionary tells us that respect is “a feeling of admiring someone or something that is good.”

1. The irony in the statement of the unclasp between the Christ of the gospels and the people of Salem. 2. The people said what they wanted to say even if it wasn’t true in order to get them in trouble because that is what they wanted. 3.

Sardonic tone reveals the characters’ true nature and hypocrisy to the audience through contradictions in writing. When introducing Mr. Putnam, Miller writes that “he was a man with many grievances, at least one of which appears justified” (Miller 14). The second part of the sentence undercuts the first, discrediting Mr. Putnam and his grievances. Miller’s sardonic tone indicates what he thinks, and by extension what he wants the audience to think, about Mr. Putnam. The tone also acts as character building for Mr. Putnam, revealing his personality.

One Choice Can Change Lives Who knew one seemingly innocent lie could cause 19 deaths and pit an entire town against itself? That’s exactly what happens in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible. Authors often use similar plot devices, and their favorite one is having their characters face a test. In a small town called Salem in early America, something terrible is happening.

The Crucible metaphor also shines bright when Judge Danforth says to Proctor,‘We burn a hot fire here; it melts down all concealment’. The court scenes always portrayed a feeling of fear, tension and conflicts between the hands that wield power. Proctor later speaks out one of his most rageful dialogues ‘A fire, a fire is burning! I hear the boot of Lucifer, I see his filthy face! …. And we will burn, we will burn together!’Here Miller makes one of the most important connection between the play’s title The Crucible and the society that he wishes to portray.

Arthur Miller constructs his play upon the famous Salem witch trails. Miller's Crucible was written in the early 1950s. Miller wrote his drama during the brief reign of the American senator Joseph McCarthy whose bitter criticized anti- communism sparkled the need for the United States to be a dramatic anti- communist society during the early tense years of the cold war. By orders from McCarthy himself, committees of the Congress commenced highly controversial investigations against communists in the U.S similar to the alleged Salem witches situation. Convict communists were ordered to confess their crime and name others to avoid the retribution.