How Did Stephen Harper Change Canada

Robert Borden was Prime Minister during the first World War. He was born on the 26th of June, 1854, in Grand-Pré Nova Scotia. Robert Borden was a Canadian lawyer and politician before he served as the eighth Prime Minister of Canada. He was elected twice on October 10th, 1911, and again in 1917. He retired on July 10, 1920, and was the third Nova Scotian to hold this office.

John A. MacDonald and Alexander Mackenzie were both Prime minister of Canada who sought to do the best for their country. Due to them being in opposite political parties, they both had different policies that they wanted to imply on Canada. McDonald 's policies were, the National Policy, the creation of the Canadian Pacific railway, slowing down the development of the Supreme court and the Royal military college. While Mackenzie 's policy was to increase free trade with the US, make Canada more independent, and cancels the building of the railway. Nevertheless, MacDonald was the one who I believe benefitted Canada 's future.. With MacDonald ordering the construction of the Canadian Pacific Railway throughout all of Canada.

Stephen Harper wants to give small businesses a tax rate cut from 11% to 9%. When the discussion for Foreign Policy and Security started, he stated that he would like to go to war with ISIS. Harper stayed strong with his beliefs and explained how Canada had the strongest economic growth since the 2008 recession. However, he mostly defended himself at the debate while the other leaders tried to attack him on his economic history. Justin Trudeau blamed Harper on giving tax cuts to the wealthiest and NDP candidate and Thomas Mulcair accused Harper of allowing Canada to lose 400,000 well-payed jobs.

Simply put, workers in Toronto have to pay minimum 15% of their wage as income taxes (2016, April 20). In addition, when they buy products in Toronto, they have to pay more 13% of the price as a harmonized sales tax (HST). HST is 5% Goods services Tax plus 8% Provincial sales tax ("Retail", 2015, June 09). After getting receipts, people will be surprised by unsuspected charges. As a result, they are supposed to reduce budget; moreover, they can get stressed about financial problems every month.

He also does an excellent job in discussing and analyzing how the two separate views lead to two separate and distinct end goals, which gives the reader an in depth ability to truly understand the complexity of the situation, and the bottleneck that it places on federal-provincial institutions. Although there are multiple points of agreement with the author's argument, there are also points of disagreement, for example he is arguing that both sides of the argument do not allow for people to make a normative judgement on the issues at hand, but downplays the problem as a whole by stating that Canadian citizens only care about policy outcomes, and not whether or not federal-provincial conflict can be balanced. In order to be more efficient in problem solving, as well as incorporate a wider range of potential solutions, the betterment of federal-provincial institutions should be made a pressing issue, and not downplayed

He states that the Canada’s current economy unfairly treats the middle and working classes, as they work more than before and yet make less . Since Harper is the Prime Minister it is then his fault. Thus, Trudeau has us feel anger towards Harper, as the failed economy is due to Harper. How effective was this appeal.

It takes a lot of courage and manpower to run a country especially such a big one like Canada. William Mackenzie-King was born 1874, he served as prime minister from 1921-30 and 1935-48. Considering he served for twenty-three year and he served as the longest standing Canadian PM through the great depression and a world war, he made few mistakes mostly not recognizing and acting during the depression. William Lyon Mackenzie King was a semi-successful prime minister considering the economic and military conflict that was present in Canada at the time of his reign. He had a close friendship with the American prime minister, Franklin Roosevelt ultimately helping the Canadian and british war effort.

While he was there, Brown changed his attitude about Canada’s future. He learned in London how tired British politicians had grown of their imposing burdens. Brown returned to Canada with new views and commitments. He declared that he had returned “with a better knowledge of public affairs and with a more ardent desire to

Canada is now known to be a diverse, multicultural, bilingual and inclusive nation largely as a result of his work. Pierre Elliott Trudeau also believed in an equal Canada for all, he is primarily the one to introduce rights and freedoms to the citizens of Canada. While some view Pierre Trudeau as impulsive, for enforcing the War Measures Act, Trudeau enacted this for the protection of Canadian citizens against radical extremist and his actions were more rational than impulsive for the situation that had suddenly occurred. Pierre Trudeau was one of Canada’s greatest Prime Minister’s, who’s impact fundamentally changed the course of the nation by introducing multiculturalism, for introducing the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and for paradoxically upholding democracy by strong action during the October Crisis.

To call this era of drastic change the ‘Quiet Revolution’ is a vivid, and yet, paradoxical description. The Quiet Revolution was a time of intense socio-political and socio-cultural change in Quebec, which extended beyond Quebec’s borders because of its influence on contemporary Canadian politics. As a result of the effects of the changes that occurred during this Quiet Revolution, most Quebec provincial governments since the early 1960s have maintained political and social orientations based on the core concepts developed and implemented during the Quiet Revolution. As such, there is no doubt that the Quiet Revolution had a significant impact in Canadian History. This impact can be characterized by the prelude to the Quiet Revolution; the demographic evolution of Quebec; the social educational reforms that were put in place; the economic reforms and their impact; the rise of nationalism; and finally, the cultural changes that occurred.

Throughout Canada’s history with numerous Prime Ministers, many would argue that William Lyon Mackenzie King was the best one. To be a good Prime Minister, one must be able to connect with the people that they are in charge of and they need to have a good understanding of different cultures in the society at hand. Throughout the course of King’s reign as Prime Minister over Canada, he made significant impacts upon numerous aspects for the country. He was a successful Prime Minister because his accomplishments during his debut as Prime Minister, his steps in Canadian autonomy and conscription, his determination over his political career, relations within the country, and finally his initiative in spending numerous efforts into accomplish

Today, Canada is seen as a multicultural and peaceful nation that has evolved over the course of history. This great nation would never have been possible without the impact that former Prime Minister, Lester B. Pearson left on this country. His achievements and insights profoundly affected and shaped Canada’s nation. First, peacekeeping is an important part of Canada’s heritage and a reflection of its fundamental beliefs that Pearson implemented after dealing with world changing situations and winning a Nobel Prize. Also, his contributions as a liberal leader as well as the flaws and controversy with Diefenbaker did in fact define this country.

William Lyon Mackenzie King, a man of glory, forever changed Canada’s constitution during the tumultuous nineteenth century and resolved all difficulties Canada faced on its way to becoming a strong, independent, and autonomous nation. His contributions and sanctions targeted all factors at the time and had interrelated effects on the construction of Canada. Unlike other Canadian politicians, King handled every crisis with thorough planning and achieved promising outcomes from unsolvable problems. It is without a doubt that King was the most influential figure in Canada’s development. His role in the autonomy, economic development, and social stability stands as solid evidence of the pioneering impacts he had on Canada’s advancement.

For a long time the debates had been going about how was the better prime minister of Canada. On the the top of most lists of best prime ministers are Mackenzie King and Sir John A. Macdonald. For example, according to the Expert Survey that was made in 2013 “Laurier came first, Macdonald second, and King third, but the difference in their overall scores was negligible”. Both prime ministers had a strong vision of the country that helped shaped Canada to become the country it is today(in 2015). Thesis: Sir John A.Macdonald was one of the founding fathers, but William Lyon Mackenzie King had to lead the country through the part of Depression and WWII, and they both have made different positive contributions to Canada and are highly respected

Thank you Canada for electing me to be your Prime Minister of this amazing country. Unlike Stephen Harper, I will keep my promises I made to everyone in this country and change things for the good of the country. One really important thing I’d like to change about Canada is the education system. Although this is a very complicated topic, there are a few things I would change, such as the tuition fees. As your new Prime Minister I’ll lower the amount of the tuition fees so, instead of the costs as $5,000-10,000 I would lower the costs to $3,000 - $5,000 so it’d be possible for many students to pay the costs for post- secondary education.