House Divided The Civil War And Reconstruction Chapter 2 Summary

Gauge Zidlick Mollie Swayne English 102 12 February 2018 How Technology Advancements Effected the Civil War The Civil War brought about many different advancements in a variety of areas during the time period. Everything from battlefield communication to weapon technology received an upgrade, allowing both the North and the South to become more effective fighters on the battlefield. New weapon technology allowed soldiers to engage each other in ways never thought of in previous wars.

With that being said, one can wonder if between these men was as described. It is difficulty to know if Douglass was very focused on Lincoln, and if Lincoln was very concerned with Douglass as portrayed in this book. It is important that we remember that although the two were once opponents, politics of racism and the emancipation allocated them to be closer, to the point that both would ultimately become heroes of American history. Furthermore, despite continued points of views on various concepts, Douglass emotionally spoke highly of Lincoln after he was assassinated. As Oakes speaks on this, one can find the uniqueness in their relationship.

Kelly Baltazar History 17A Mon. & Wed. 10:00-11:15 A.M. Radical And The Republican Paper Abraham Lincoln is known as the republican while Fredrick Douglass is known as the radical, both of these men kept their distance from each other although Abraham Lincoln (the president) and Fredrick Douglass (a runaway slave) knew who each other were, it took them a long time for them to get together and work on the slavery problem together. Douglass just had one issue though, he didn't really trust Lincoln and thought that it had took Lincoln too long to proclaim emancipation. Both men came up up a lot, both men are important historical figures and what many people tend to want to know is why?

Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass are both powerful speakers and influential figures during their times especially during the Civil War in the 1800s. Through their powerful speeches, they spread their ideas through oratory which appealed and captivated their audience with their powerful speeches. Both Lincoln and Douglass have a different standing when concern of their social and political position in the economy, whereas one is the president of the Whig Party and President of the United State during the time of the Civil War and the other one is a runaway slave who devoted his entire life to ending slavery and the Civil Rights of so many African Americans. It can also be said to their different approach on a topic such as slavery. Douglass

The election of 1860 was one of the most influential in the history of the U.S. Tensions were high between democratic and republican parties. The democratic party itself was divided. Laws regarding slavery were conflicting with each other causing outrage on both sides of the issue. Something needed to be done and the election was the answer to it. A firm foundation needed to be set on slavery and it would drive the entire nation in the direction of the Commander and Chief’s choosing.

We can state the obvious, that we are not all perfect, and we certainly say things we don’t mean. Was President Lincoln really a racist? There is documented text that could point evidence that leans in either direction. Things said in the heat of long debates and drawn out conversations that ran for hours, does not make such a monumental man a poor or hypocritical person. Looking at the Constitutional right that “All men are created equal” to the thought that things won’t change without action, and to a man with no moral obligation other than to share his personal option that slavery was wrong, we dive into President Lincoln.

While the debates did not address the rights of Black Americans, it did allow the public to see both Lincoln and Douglas in a brighter light. Douglas publically stated that Lincoln had favored race equality, calling him a Radical Republican and therefore hurting his chances at ever getting a position in politics. Lincoln then challenged Douglas to a series of debates between late August and mid October in Illinois. Douglas accused Lincoln and Trumbull of conspiring to bring down Whig party in order to get their dream of abolishing slavery and getting into office. One person commented that these debates showed how much American politics have changed over the last two years, and will continue to change in the years coming.

Abraham Lincoln, Frederic Douglass, were one of the most appealing well-known speakers, people who did believe that slavery was morally wrong and devote their lives to fight for freedom. However, there are several differences between the view of the Constitution’s position differences between Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass. Kansas-Nebraska Act indicated that the recognition of slavery should be determined by the decision of these residents (popular or squatter sovereignty). This act itself conflicted heavily with the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, which was essentially seen as the admittance of slavery anywhere in the country. This act made a political issue of confrontation between North and South.

Douglass was always critical of Lincoln but his criticisms were never really consistent or stable. In “He Saved His Country,” Douglass laid out the best and worst qualities of Lincoln and how they affected colored people in America. He wasted no time calling out Lincoln’s racism. Despite Lincoln’s major, ground-breaking policies to emancipate slaves, he was still a white supremacist and made no secret of it. Douglass made sure to specify this one caveat before going on to praise Lincoln for the good that he had done for his people.

Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass are American heroes with each exemplifying a unique aspect of the American spirit. In his recent study, "The Radical and the Republican: Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln, and the Triumph of Antislavery Politics" (2007), Professor James Oakes traces the intersecting careers of both men, pointing out their initial differences and how their goals and visions ultimately converged. Oakes is Graduate School Humanities Professor and Professor of History at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. He has written extensively on the history of slavery in the Old South. Oakes reminds the reader of how much Lincoln and Douglass originally shared.

In the beginning Douglass thought of freedom as a place of euphoria and peace; he read books to help him learn how to read and write so he could get out of slavery and have freedom. When he was learning to read from the white children he stated “I wish I could be as free as they would be when they got to men”. He thought of his life and the only future for him was to be a “slave for life”. Towards the end “the silver trump of freedom had roused my soul to eternal weakness”. Aiming for freedom gave him strength, but when he began reading and learning about freedom it “now appeared to disappear no more forever” and it caused him to become weak.

Lincoln and Douglass promoted human rights in order to develop America. Both Lincoln and Douglass shared similar thoughts when it came to slavery later in the Civil War. Yet, in some ways their thoughts differed due to their own personal perspectives, affecting the way slavery should be dealt with. Lincoln, also known as “The Great Emancipator” was neither for or against slavery. While on the other hand, Douglass, at a point in time a slave himself, was against slavery.

In this election, Lincoln and Douglas had some series of debates over slavery. Although Lincoln never exactly stated that he wanted to abolish slavery, much of the South believed he was an Abolitionist. At his speech in 1858 in Springfield Illinois, Lincoln wanted the nation to be one thing or another, meaning all free or all slave, because it couldn’t keep going on how it was, else it would fall apart. In his speech, Lincoln said, “...but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other” (Doc G).

He won’t stand by and let people accept what society has told them about slaves. Douglass wants them to come to their own decisions about slavery and all the comes with

Soren Kierkegaard once wrote in a book called Either/Or Part II that, “Someone can conquer kingdoms and countries without being a hero; someone else can prove himself a hero by controlling his temper. Someone can display courage by doing the out-of-the-ordinary, another by doing the ordinary….” In other words, heroes can be anyone by what little they do to what big they do for society (wikiquotes).Soren Kierkegaard was a Danish existentialist philosopher, and religious author. Soren Kierkegaard definition of a hero is one that society would no Heroes are often described as individuals who save the Earth from evil if it is domestic or extraterrestrial;I believe that Soren Kierkegaard definition of a hero is realistic and not as farfetch like