Honorable Conditions Discharge Essay

From: Ashlee Nong HCA 340 To: Professor Schipske 06 October 2017 Duncan v. Scottsdale Medical Imaging Ltd., Supreme Court of Arizona 70 P.3d 435, 2003 1. The complete title and citation of the case: Duncan v. Scottsdale Medical Imaging Ltd., 70 P. 3d 435 (2003). 2. Explain which court decided this case: Supreme Court of Arizona decided this case. The Court of Appeals maintained the trial judge's decisions, yet the Supreme Court concurred with Duncan that the Medical Malpractice Act arrangement which bars misbehavior claims in view of battery abuses the Arizona Constitution's assurance for the privilege to sue.

P alleges excessive force and false arrest. P alleges that he was giving his friend a cane when MOS arrested him. P alleges that he did not have any drugs instead his friend (non-party) had Xanax pills. MOS state that UC observed P in hand to hand drug transaction. P was unable to make bail and remained incarcerated for 6 days.

During this time frame, the accused had no direct supervision of the parolee. The defendants were not appreciative of any danger the parolee Mr. Vanda posed to the community or to the decedent. Were the actions of the board so direct account of his carelessness release of Mr. Vanda that it assumes the state action as required to state a claim under section 1983? I surmise that the incontestable facts fail to establish the necessary state

We appreciate you taking an interest in Tom Geers, and are thankful that you are willing to work with us to try to help him. We request that his case be re-opened. We want his present Florida consecutive sentence CHANGED to a concurrent sentence with his present Federal sentence. We believe Tom’s sentence is extreme.

On 10/30/2015, at approximately 2040 hours, Officer Bowman and your affiant were dispatched to 208 East Mount Vernon Street. The caller, Paul Whalen, stated that his brother just called someone to sell and drop off prescription medication. Your affiant arrived at 208 East mount Vernon Street and briefly spoke with Paul. I asked Paul if Jeffrey was at the house and he informed me that he was inside. Paul escorted me inside the living room where I waited for Jeffrey Whalen (defendant) to come downstairs from his bedroom.

He gave the court noticeable different answers under oath. Due to the inconstancy of the priest’s testimony, his testimony will be discarded and inadmissible. When determining the outcome and severity of your sentencing, I must consider both aggravating and mitigating factors.

The school board was unanimous in its decision of refusing Erb’s resignation. Erb was offered a position for the following school year. A notice of the hearing for revocation of Richard Erb’s teaching certificate was due to “moral turpitude” The State Board of Examiners voted five to four to revoke Richard Erb’s certificate. Trial court then upheld the revocation of the certificate.

As you can see from the objection letter, I need you to describe everything opposite, diminish its harshness and give the DA nothing to onslaught me as they have done prior—attack that objection letter Counsel, please! ***I remember I did gave a statement that says I participated in the burglaries, but that was the cops sweet talked me with cigarettes and phone calls after a 4 hours ride (Cairo, Illinois to Cook & Kankakee Counties). I was naïve and thoughts that if I give what they want to hear, they would drop the charges. Needless to say, I DID NOT enter the residences but was only served as a lookout while Ryan & the third guy pull the heists*** The prior petition I did not know the need to include another arrest that is not in the state of Illinois.

Thompson The applicant requests an upgrade of his general under honorable conditions discharge to honorable conditions. The applicant states, in effect, he took full responsibility for his actions, he only asking for an upgrade because the main reason he joined was to obtain the educational benefits. The applicant states, in effect, he only had a year of service remaining on his contract and this was his only offense,he was punishment like any other Soldier, reduction to E-2, 30 days extra duty, and 60 probation, and before he finish serving is punishment. The applicant contends he was informed, that they were proceeding ahead and recommended him for separation.

Consol. School District the courts denied her claim of retaliatory discharge the reason being mutual trust and confidence between Procunier and Jennings were essential to the proper functioning of the workplace and Jennings’ discharge was based upon a loss of trust and confidence by Procunier, which was reasonable under the circumstances. 4. How do you legally defend your recommendation? a.

For example, in the case of General Jeffrey Sinclair, he had inappropriate relationships with female subordinates. He would plead guilty to adultery which is a crime in the military. He would be reduced to Lieutenant Colonel and allowed to retire (Zucchion, 2014). This was a slap in the face to his victims and to other soldiers who were put out of the Army without retirement. Due to his position as a general, he could leave the Army with a substantial

However, though this acknowledgment is a step forwards, it remains limited; this is because it solely refers to the military service itself, and does not include the right to object to auxiliary forms of service and only sees absolute and universal objections towards military service, excluding those who object to certain military activities or

The applicant requests an upgrade of his general, under honorable conditions discharge to honorable. The applicant states, in effect, he accepted his punishment and feel he deserve more the time his in service. The applicant contends he joined the military at the age of 18, straight out of high school in order to attend college and obtain a degree. The applicant contends he served in the Army for ten years, deployed to Iraq on three occasions, and received the Army Commendation Medal for his performance of duty.

Another group of individuals to challenge Assembly Bill 12 are those that are ineligible. According to the All-County letter, it is part of California’s regulations that any foster youth in the military

The following analyses the different roles and duties performed during the trial of issues on 17 August. This report also comments on the proceedings and a potential reason of appeal. The sentencing of this case is still to be decided and is currently scheduled for 14 October