Tyler Fus
Mrs. Kigar
Honors 10
22 March 2023
Fixing the Fixers of College Sports
Temptations of cash wads bigger than their bank accounts, items of significant value: lucrative perks that fixers of college athletics use to bribe student-athletes into committing crimes that could potentially ruin their careers. To athletes taking these bribes, by simply intending to miss a few extra shots, the return is too big to not take up. In F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, the protagonist Jay Gatsby finds himself involved with a gangster, Meyer Wolfsheim. “‘He's the man who fixed the World Series back in 1919.’”(Fitzgerald 73). While during the 1920s, times were much different than today, the reason behind players fixing games was exactly the same. Money. Unlike in the 1920s, most professional athletes are making millions of dollars. However, despite new Name Image and Likeness (NIL) deals, college athletes are bribed with enough money to set themselves up for life. Corruption in sports is a serious issue undermining the integrity of the game and must be stopped by prohibiting college sports betting and allowing student-athletes to get paid.
Sports wagering can adversely impact student-athletes
…show more content…
Current corruption in college sports jeopardizes play for student-athletes and those who watch them. If governments fail to execute new laws prohibiting college sports betting and allowing athletes to get paid, the stakes will keep getting higher and higher for fixers and athletes involved with them. College athletes will feel the temptation more than ever before. Violent gangsters are taking advantage of the legalized laws of college betting and bribing athletes into crimes that ruin lives. Prohibiting college sports betting and allowing student-athletes to get paid eliminates corruption
A year after the defeat of the White Sox in a World Series battle against the Reds, eight players of the Chicago team enlightened the American public of their prior involvement in illegal graft (Carnes & Garraty, 1999). According to the American National Biography, Chick Gandil—first baseman for the Sox—brought together a collation of teammates in the year 1919 with aspirations to collect bonus cash for aiding a major betting scandal (1999). The Black Sox—Cicotte, Felsch, Gandil, Jackson, McMullin, Risberg, Weaver, and Williams—intentionally abetted in Chicago’s loss of the 1919 World Series despite their present fame while seeking to earn a larger fortune (LeBoutillier, 2012). The year 1919 marked the beginning of the postwar season. Anderson—author
Kelli Kuchefski Professor Buttrick Business Ethics 4/23/18 NCAA Bribery Scandal I. Introduction Today’s society is full of ethical dilemmas that question whether people are acting morally or immorally correct. How is it that we, as a society, are not able to determine whether our actions are right or wrong? Is it that we, as humans, feel we are exempt from following the rules? One area of focus that is getting a lot of press lately, where morals and ethics are in question, is the world of college sports and athletics. II.
This shows the reader that the idea of legalizing sports gambling is realistic and has been achieved in other parts of the world. Silver also address a common counter-argument to this particular issue. He states “Let me be clear: Any new approach must ensure the integrity of the game.” As the NBA’s commissioner this is Silver’s duty.
In the 1919 world series the Chicago White Sox were going against the Cincinnati Reds. Little did baseball fans know, this whole game was about to be the biggest scandal in baseball history. Chick Gandil was the mastermind behind this whole scandal. Chick Gandil played first base for the White Sox. In the article “The Black Sox Baseball Scandal, 95 Years Ago,” the author states, “...gamblers had paid several White Sox players to intentionally lose games.
Leo Kaplan Ms. Skemp-Cook Academic Writing 8 May 2023 The Case For Paying College Athletes College athletes are not receiving the respect they deserve. They work day after day putting in the effort to contend for division championships and earn their team money but in the process, they are not being compensated in return. With schools collecting tons of revenue every year, college programs should have no problem paying athletes. For example, the Department of Education has stated that in 2019, college athletic programs earned $14 billion, which was a major increase from $4 billion in 2003 (Drozdowski).
College sports are a significant part of American culture and generate billions of dollars in revenue every year. While universities profit greatly from the work of college athletes, the athletes themselves receive no compensation for their hard work. The question of whether college athletes should be paid has been debated in recent years, with strong arguments on both sides. In this essay, I will argue that college athletes should be paid for their work.
Over time, college sports evolved into a multi-billion dollar industry, with universities and the NCAA reaping significant financial gains from ticket sales, sponsorships, and merchandise. Despite this, student athletes are still considered amateur participants, with the NCAA maintaining strict rules against paying athletes for their participation. This has led to a growing movement advocating for the recognition of student athletes as employees, as they are essential to the success of college sports. The legal and ethical arguments surrounding the employee status of student athletes are complex and
In his March Madness interview, Mark Emmert, the head of the NCAA, states how it would be “utterly unacceptable…to convert students into employees” (PBS). There would also be little to no difference between college and professional sports, and would fail to preserve the “amateurism”, as valued by the NCAA. Emmert justified this principle by claiming that “college athletes can’t be paid for their labor or commercial use of their names, images…because such pay would be exploitative” (O’Bannon). This arbitrary line between how college athletes are paid compared to their coaches and their performance on the field does little to fully explain to the extent to which college athletes cannot profit off anything during their college careers. While college athletes receive virtually little to no compensation for their contributions to their sports, their coaches can make up to an average of $1.75 million dollars.
Although the common person may think that it is just a sport, it is much more than that. The time, dedication, and sheer effort that collegiate athletes must put in would be hard for anyone to manage. When the average college student is short on money they are about to go out and get a job so they can pay for their wants and needs. College athletes are different from a regular student in this aspect because they are unable to work a normal job due to their hectic schedule. In an article debating whether college sports are truly a job, Robert McCormick, a law professor at Michigan State, states “ ‘There are more demands put on these young men than any employee of the university’”(qtd in Cooper).
This shows how cruel and greedy colleges are to the people making the money for them. Another reality is that college athletics generate billions of dollars every year, and everyone wants a piece of the action. Everyone, that is, except the players.” To conclude, this shows why college athletes should get just a little portion of the money they make for the colleges because it will affect how they play in a very positive
According to the article it states “Despite rules preventing such actions, coaches, shoe executives, agents, apparel representatives, and other industry professionals often conspire to pay recruits to join a specific college it is a practice that stays out of the public eye because everyone involved benefits if no one knows about the payments using money to influence a high school student to select a specific program and hire a specific business manager is felony-level conduct allowing college athletes to be paid would help to limit this issue, which would reduce investigation costs across the board (personal finance blog par 4). What this is trying to say is Colleges that are going after these players by offering them benefits that they know they do not have in their life really gets their attention. Now if college players are allowed to receive endorsements It would stop these coaches from corrupting these kids and trying to stop stacking the program to be dominant in sports
Already, the system of college athletics is corrupt. People see that all this money is being made and the college athletes are completely getting
Did you know that the NCAA supplies college student-athletes with over 3.6 billion dollars worth of scholarships each year? Despite this equitable form of compensation for playing a sport of their desire, so many people nationally believe these athletes should be paid a yearly salary! In this essay, reasons will be given to you as to why these colleges should not pay their athletes. There are so many facts and statistics in which all couldn’t be included, but there is still a plethora of information backing these athletes not being paid. College student-athletes should not be paid a salary by their colleges because they do not bring in all the money and attention as it’s perceived, they can already make money off of their name, image, and likeness
Should college athletes be paid? Annotated Bibliography Benedykiuck, Mike. “The Blue Line: College athletes should be paid.” Dailyfreepress.
Amateurism in college athletics is an exploitation of the athletes who participate in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) sports. The amount of work that is done by these athletes to help their respective institutions generate millions of dollars in revenue, goes seemingly unnoticed when identifying the substantial amount of money flow in NCAA sports and the amount of people, from stakeholders to alumni, that benefit from this source. Amateurism, the foundation of NCAA sports, has been in place for over a century of time dating back to the early 1900s. Any athlete who is making money for work they’ve done outside of their institution is not being exploited, however, an athlete can easily be placed on the other end of the spectrum when he or she is withheld from recognizing the true monetary value of their talents and likeness that are being used for the profit of the school or others. The NCAA is understandably satisfied with the continuous growth of its’ revenue each year, yet the problem they face of having people accept that “student-athletes” are just amateurs is growing as well.