The racial and injustices different races have to deal with in America. Being black and hispanic in America can be unfair. Dealing with police brutality, mass incarceration, racial profiling are things that describe what some black and hispanics deal with on a day to day basis. Author Nicole Gonzalez Van Cleve goes into depth of how hispanics and people of color are treated in the court system of the United states. Gonzalez Van Cleve opens the doors of the courthouse and takes us for a journey. She describes the way judges, prosecutors, and sheriffs act down in the courtroom. From judges falling asleep to the racial abuse that black and hispanic folks are put through. Gonzalez Van Cleve was effective using rhetorical devices such as logo, ethos, …show more content…
69% of African Americans were convicted. 84% of state attorneys were white and 74% of judges were also white. The Cook County jail is the largest jail in the nation, housing around ten thousand inmates. “The vast majority, 67.3 percent, of those admitted to the jail are young African American males between the ages of twenty-one and thirty from Chicago’s South Side and West Side— creating a perversely convenient arrangement whereby the jail is closest to its target population.” (Van Cleve. 19). Ninety six acres of land with more than half of the jail being incarcerated African …show more content…
Through the chapter she used many experts' notes and summary of what they had written but she didn’t name these experts. For example, one defense attorney explained; “[What] really shocked the hell out of me when I started was, I’d go back in the lockup and everybody’s black. Now that doesn’t shock me anymore but that still shocks my students… then, I was just shocked by the way people were treated. By “people,” I mean victims, defendants, defendants' families.”(Van Cleve 27). She had many explanations and stories she used but she only named two experts in this chapter. One being sociologist Armando Lara-Millan (2014) and Javier Auyero (2012). A lot of the people who gave testaments were referred to as defense attorneys and court
Asia’s letters had also said that her boyfriend and his best friend had seen Adnan in the library after school between 2:15-2:40 pm. Ms. Guiterrez had certainly made a huge mistake of not contacting Asia because Asia would have been able to provide her part of the story to prove Adnan’s innocence and also have two other witnesses to support her story to be valid. The defense attorney had made a terrible error with the case because the result of the trial could have ended differently if she would have contacted Asia McClain. Another example of Ms. Guiterrez’s deficient work was because she was sick and greedy for money. Ms. Guiterrez had many records of her demanding money from clients to supposedly use for judge experts in the case, but she kept the money to herself for her personal use or to pay for her medical bill.
(Craig Hemmens, 2017)” 3. What role did the defense attorney play in this case? What sort of defense did s/he mount for the defendant? Did s/he seem to perform to the best of his/her ability in regard to the case? Did s/he do anything that seemed to violate his/her duty?
The attorneys-at-law that are defending Mr. Darnay but instead of defending him, they were listening to the sounds in their head of their own voices. The court is nothing more than mirrors in the hall. They actually have halls of mirrors, they would place humongous mirrors
In a country where people are promised equal and fair treatment regardless of their gender or racial identity, Stevenson, through McMillian, shows the gory side of the reality that exists within the United States’ judicial system. A system that offers justice to some and victimizes
The attorneys for the accused decided to put Mary Abernathy and Pokey Barnes, both “unlettered,” facing some of the best trial lawyers in the state. Lebsock’s juxtaposition of the educated lawyers and the illiterate orators works well and exposes the problematic assumptions that reside in such a facile
While Berryhill has done extensive research, much of the information he presents comes from news articles, court documents, and other secondary sources. This means that there are times when the book feels like a summary of other people’s work, rather than an original
The court brought in a psychologist during the trial. The psychologist was Thomas Eliseo interviewed Gacy before the trial. The psychologist said that he found Gacy to be very intelligent. Although, he believed that Gacy suffered from borderline schizophrenia. Other medical experts testified also.
Incarceration rates in the United States are extremely higher than other countries. According to Schlesinger in her article “The Failure of Race Neutral Policies: How Mandatory Terms and Sentencing Enhancements Contribute to Mass Racialized Incarceration” there are, “Currently, one and a half million people are incarcerated in either state or federal prisons” (Schlesinger). This number is very high compared to other countries. A large majority of the people incarcerated are African Americans.
According to The University of Michigan's law education, African Americans are seven times more likely than white Americans to be falsely convicted of serious crimes due to their race (law.umich.edu). Bryan Stevenson who is a human rights lawyer and author wrote the memoir by the name of Just Mercy. This piece focuses on the idea that the criminal justice system is discriminatory. In this memoir, he defends and fights for citizens to protect their rights as a person. Bryan Stevenson beautifully utilizes strong word choice, repetition, and emotional appeal to emphasize and persuade the readers that the efforts to fight institutional cruelty and raise the most vulnerable to a “higher ground” is what matters most.
More than two hundred newspaper reporters from all over the world had come to the small town of Dayton to witness the historical event take place; for the first time in history, a trial would be broadcast over the radio. (Johnson) The judge of the trial was John T. Raulston, a conservative Christian who craved publicity. The jury consisted of twelve men, the majority of them being farmers and church-goers. Superintendent White led off the prosecution’s list of witnesses with his testimony that John Scopes had admitted to teaching about evolution from Hunter’s Civic Biology textbook.
We live in a society where ethnic minorities are target for every minimal action and/or crimes, which is a cause to be sentenced up to 50 years in jail. African Americans and Latinos are the ethnic minorities with highest policing crimes. In chapter two of Michelle Alexander’s book, The Lockdown, we are exposed to the different “crimes” that affects African American and Latino minorities. The criminal justice system is a topic discussed in this chapter that argues the inequality that people of color as well as other Americans are exposed to not knowing their rights. Incarceration rates, unreasonable suspicions, and pre-texts used by officers are things that play a huge role in encountering the criminal justice system, which affects the way
Along with African-American/Blacks, the Hispanic population is underrepresented at both the state and federal levels while the Caucasian/White population are underrepresented (Walker, Spohn, & DeLone, 2018). This essay will discuss multiple different races and ethinicities to regard their population make up within the prison system. Although race and ethnicity relate to one another they are different. According to Walker et al. (2018), race is defined as the, “major biological divisions of mankind,” for
So, in many, if not most, of the cases, the accusers and the accused were unacquainted. Boyer and
Annotated Bibliography Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York: The New Press. Alexander opens up on the history of the criminal justice system, disciplinary crime policy and race in the U.S. detailing the ways in which crime policy and mass incarceration have worked together to continue the reduction and defeat of black Americans.
From a well educated background, his qualifications verify his interpretation to Martin Guerre’s case. Not only was he present for the trial, he was one of the ten judges overseeing the case. He was also a skilled lawyer and professor at a university. He