Essay On Southerners And The Southern States

The British lowered prices on British products, to lower on American production goods. This resulted in the Northern Industry losing out on the Southern Market. The Northerners went to Washington and legislating protective tariffs challenged British cheap imports. Succession from the nation was the only way the Southerners would’ve took. The South was gearing up for strength, for the battle of independence.

In order to calm things down, they made the Force Bill which forced them to pay the taxes. If they did not, then President Jackson had the right to harshly make South Carolina do it, by using the army. Jackson did not agree in letting a state nullify Federal

We cannot say that this decision was bad or unfair for both camps either. 1830 was the year when a Protective Tariff was enacted that wanted to protect Northern products by making British products high in price. Once it was enacted, it became a number one sectional issue for the South. They had financial interest with Britain and threatened to leave the Union. This was resolved by gradually decreasing this Tariff every year until well into the 1840s, but it created a situation that had been remembered for years to come and might have contributed to the secession in 1861.

The Virginia and Kentucky resolutions as explained by Madison and Jefferson respectively were aimed at expressing the support for the United States constitution, as well as the constitution of these states . These resolutions were also aimed at safeguarding the constitutions of these two states, as well as the act of Congress against all forms of foreign and internal aggression. These resolutions contradict with the excerpt from the proclamation on nullification by Andrew Jackson. Here, a declaration was made to nullify some parts of the Acts of the US Congress that imposed duties and imposts on all imported foreign goods. The proclamation made it clear that these parts of the US Congress Acts were a violation of the true meaning and intent

The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 were Democratic and Republican responses to the Alien and Sedition Acts passed earlier that same year by a Federalist Congress. Drafted in secret by future presidents: Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the resolutions stated the Alien and Sedition Acts as unconstitutional and claimed that because these acts overstepped federal authority under the Constitution, they were worthless. The resolutions have a complicated history. They were an early defense of the Constitution’s protection of civil rights, especially freedom of speech and the press, however, because they argued that the acts illegally stole powers reserved for the states, they also became the founding documents in the states’ rights movement and were cited.

After the War of 1812, Calhoun worked together with other U.S. Congressmen to establish the Second Bank of the United States, a standing army and navy, and also introduced the idea of a permanent road system. In the 1820’s Southerners grew worried that the North was strongly influencing the federal government. The south was anxious that the government would end southern institutions. In 1828, the Tariff of Abominations was passed. The tariff “sought to protect northern and western agricultural products from competition with foreign imports; however, the resulting tax on foreign goods would raise the cost of living in the South and would cut into the profits of New England's industrialists” (http://history.house.gov/HistoricalHighlight/Detail/36974).

By: Abdulaziz Alaskar John C. Calhoun Crisis #3 Dear Citizens of the U.S., I am 100% opposing to the tariffs. The purpose of the Tariffs was to provide protection to Industrialists and Manufacturers in the North, to do that they increased duties on imported foreign goods by the British. The union is helping one part and affecting the other. Us the southerners are being harmed firstly by paying higher prices on goods that we couldn’t produce, and secondly increasing taxes on British imports made it difficult for Britain to pay for the cotton they imported from the South.

1). In both documents Daniel Webster and the citizens of South Carolina convey a strong argument regarding the topic of states being able to nullify federal laws. In the Liberty and Union speech, Daniel Webster addresses the topic and opposes the doctrine by stating how the government and Constitution was created by and for the people and on how the American people have preserved their own chosen Constitution for the past 40 years since it has been created. Because of this, the American people have prospered happily, grown and become stronger with America, as the country has progressed. While Daniel Webster stated valid points regarding South Carolina’s Senator Robert Haynes, in 1832, South Carolina held a convention to represent their official position on the nullification of federal laws towards President Andrew Jackson and the tariffs of 1832.

The Union wanted to keep the country together, while the South wanted to become independent, just as they had from Britain. Due to legality

Many Southerners like John C. Calhoun, who was the Vice President at the time, were extremely upset about. They thought something had to be done. That’s when South Carolina Exposition and Protest came into play. This wasn’t an actual protest of people who didn’t like the tax on imported goods. It was an important document written by John C. Calhoun.

In the early 1830’s, South Carolina had the idea that they could nullify the law. This meant that the states could disregard some of the federal laws. A man named John C. Calhoun Promoted the idea. In 1828, there was a tariff passed that put a tax on all imports. Calhoun and a lot of Southern states were outraged.

Primary Document Analysis: Alien and Sedition Acts Along with the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions The Alien and Sedition Acts were signed by then-President John Adams on June 18, 1798, roughly eleven years after the signing of the current U.S. Constitution. It was done during a time of heightened tensions between the United States and European countries. These four new laws were designed to give new powers to the President regarding immigrants, also known as aliens.

As a democracy, we expect our leaders to care about the we want as a union. However, this isn 't what we always get. For example, Andrew Jackson could be considered one of these self serving leaders. To some, Andrew Jackson represents a war hero but others would say he was an arrogant and unbending person. Impoverished and uneducated he would rise from orphan to war hero leaving thousands of Native Americans dead in the wake of his political ambitions.

When Congress issued tariffs on foreign goods, Southerners believed that Congress favored the North since this tariff would benefit them. John Randolph spoke of this issue, arguing that Congress was being unfair since the South was not benefiting from the actions of Congress at all while the North benefited (Doc A). As for political conflict, there was a clear case of factionalism and political rivalry in 1824 (Doc I). With these conflicts amongst the varying factions and political parties, the political tension and sectionalism within America continued to grow. Accusations and anger from the South further separated them from the North, which did not contribute “good feelings” to the country at

As I stated before, the South’s economy was mainly agricultural and the tariffs (taxes to be paid on a particular class of imports or exports) usually just benefited the North with their industrial economy. The high taxes were good for the North because it protected their products but it just caused the South to have to pay more. This annoyance was another reason the South decided to leave the